Preview

The Difference Between an Interview, and Interrogation.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Difference Between an Interview, and Interrogation.
Criminal Investigations – 18
8/11/12

Individual Assignment Week 4

Discuss the difference between the terms interview and interrogation

The main differences, between interview and interrogation are that an interview is conducted in a friendly or socialable atmosphere where a witness is more comfortable physically and psychologically. However, when a possible suspect is questioned in an uncomfortable atmosphere, where he or she is under psychological stress and pressure, it is an interrogation. (Ncthakur, 2012)

Identify the rule when Miranda Warnings are required

When the police arrest a suspect and want to ask questions, the law in the United States requires law officials to issue specific warnings, (Miranda rights) to the person being arrested, or the statement will fail to be admitted into evidence. This rule and protocol was put in affect to properly protect the constitutional rights against forced self – incrimination and to secure the assistance of counsel in criminal proceedings. Even though these rights have been in effect since the signing of the Bill of Rights, the warnings incident to arrest developed 200myears later as a way of protecting the rights from encroachment by over aggressive law officials. (Ehow, 2012)

Discuss the legal implications of the term in custody

The term “In Custody” can be very flexible and may mean actual imprisonment, incarceration, physical imprisonment, and/or manual possession. In order for a person to be entitled to Habeas Corpus relief, which provides for release from unlawful confinement in violation of constitutional rights, he or she must be in custody. Custody in this context is the same as restraint of certain liberties, and does not always mean actual incarceration. People who are on probation or who have been released on parole are also in custody for purposes for Habeas Corpus proceedings.

Explain and discuss the recommended setting for an interrogation and interview

Having the



Cited: Christine Hess, K. H. (2012). Criminal Investigation Tenth Edition. Ehow. (2012). Warnings of Arrest. http://www.ehow.com/info_8355495_warnings-arrest.html. Ncthakur. (2012). INTERVIEW AND INTERROGATION IN THE INVESTIGATION OF CRIME. http://ncthakur.itgo.com/chand3a.htm.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Miranda v. Arizona case is considered to be one of the most important and famous cases in modern law history that provided the foundation for some important legal provisions. It occurred in 1966 in Arizona, when a young man named Ernesto Miranda, a Mexican immigrant living in Phoenix, Arizona, was charged with robbery, kidnapping, and rape of a young woman several years prior the trial (Zalman, 2010). Before the suspect was interrogated, the police did not inform him of his constitutional right to remain silent which allowed the interrogators to get the confession. Given that this case provided the foundation for the right to remain silent, it became very famous and important. The present paper attempts to analyze the…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reynold Lancaster discussed how the Miranda warning is used by police officers and other law enforcements when they arrest a person of interest. The Miranda warning allows the officers…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling of Miranda v. Arizona set a precedence on how future suspects would be interrogated. It makes complete sense to advise a person that is being interrogated that he or she has a right to remain silent during interrogation and that he or she has the right to have counsel present during an interrogation. It's also important that the suspect be fully aware and full understand his or her rights before the interrogation begins. -WRITTEN AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION-METHODS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT By Harvey Wallace and Cliff Roberson(CHAPTER 9 PAGE 136)…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scottish Legal System

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages

    * Your final task is to investigate the roles of the Lord Advocate and the…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona 1966

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Arizona made requirements that the law had to follow, which stated law enforcement officials must follow protocol before questioning suspect in custody. “These rules specified that a suspect must be read the “Miranda warning,” now famous from police shows on television, and then must be asked whether he agrees to “waive” those rights. If the suspect declines, the police are required to stop all questioning. Even if the suspect waives his rights, at any time during an interrogation he can halt the process by retracting the waiver or asking for a lawyer. From that point on, the police are not allowed even to suggest that the suspect reconsider” ("National Center for Policy Analysis", 1996). Since the requirements were made and law enforcement has to abide by the facts of the impact, they have found that it is more complicated to get the offenders to admit to wrong doing with a confession. After the decision of the Miranda rights, various states in the US had a percentage drop of individuals whom actually confessed. With the states having so many individuals accused of a crime and the Miranda rule taking effect, they found that it makes it complex to solve the crime at hand. Since that present time the rates of solving crimes have drastically changed and have concurrently stayed that way from that time to current. Knowingly not be able to solve as many violent or property crimes, less convictions have become a tough issue. The effects of the…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over the years the Miranda rights are used to ensure justice and preserve liberty ever since the case Miranda v. Arizona. All though people may see the Miranda Rights/ warning as an act of not trying to ensure justice it is because if we didn't use them today then there would be many more cases like Miranda v. Arizona and lead to a corruptio in our police stations atound th…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Court maintained that the defendant's right against self-incrimination has long been part of Anglo-American law as a means to equalize the vulnerability inherent in being detained. Such a position, unchecked, can often lead to government abuse. For example, the Court cited the continued high incidence of police violence designed to compel confessions from a suspect. This and other…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Janet Ainsworth

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Janet Ainsworth’s article, “‘You have the right to remain silent…’ but only if you ask for it just so: the role of linguistic ideology in American police interrogation law,” she explores the linguistic complexities of legal language, specifically the usage of the Miranda Rights in interrogation.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Miranda warning (often abbreviated to "Miranda," or "Mirandizing" a suspect) is the name of the formal warning that is required to be given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial situation) before they are interrogated, in accordance with the Miranda ruling. Its purpose is to ensure the accused are aware of, and reminded of, these rights under the U.S. Constitution, and that they know they can invoke them at any time during the interview.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Creation of the Miranda rights has changed the relationship between citizen state and police suspects. Citizens now have the right to be informed and assurance that they will be protected by institutional power. Suspects can now anybody that they had nothing to with it. The Miranda warnings are rights that are not protected by the Constitution. They are simply a precaution to guarantee protection against self –incrimination. Without the Miranda rights, the treatment of criminals would not be fair.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case of Miranda v. Arizona dealt with the question, “Does the police practice of interrogating individuals without notifying them of their right to counsel and their protection against self-incrimination violate the Fifth Amendment?” This case started in 1963, when Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona for robbing $8 from a bank worker, and was charged with armed robbery. He already had a record for armed robbery, and a juvenile record including attempted rape, assault, and burglary. While Miranda was in police custody, he signed a written confession to the robbery, and also to kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old woman 11 days before the robbery. After being convicted, Miranda’s lawyer appealed; on the basis that the defendant did not know he was protected from self-incrimination and therefore did not have to confess to his crimes.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study Guide Justice System

    • 31311 Words
    • 157 Pages

    4. One of the first-known attempts to establish a written code of conduct was the:…

    • 31311 Words
    • 157 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Miranda Rights are part of a preventative criminal procedure rule that states law enforcement are required to administer Miranda Rights to an individual who is in custody and is subject to direct questioning for a criminal violation of law. When a person is detained or taken into custodial arrest and interrogated for a criminal offense, if he or she wishes to remain silent the individual must expressly state that he or she chooses to remain silent. In addition, if the individual asserts that he or she wishes to speak to an attorney or have an attorney present, police must then cease interrogations and wait until…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It took four hours for them jurors to come back with a guilty verdicts on Couey, the subject was a convicted sex offender already before the murder of the victim he had admitted before the trial he had killed Lunsford. His confession was thrown out by the judge because the police had made an error by not having a lawyer present during his confession although the psychologist testified that Couey showed signs of mental illness and retardation. The jury that convicted him convened again the trial sentencing phase recommended that he be put to death a recommended by Judge Richard Howard for his part.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PACE

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will discuss problems within the investigative process prior to The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). It will then go into detail as to when and why the Police and Criminal Evidence act was introduced and the codes entailed in it. Furthermore, it shall explain the advantages of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act being introduced and how it may have helped the investigative process including cases, as well as any disadvantages it may have caused, ending up with a clear conclusion of what the Police and Criminal Evidence Act is and whether or not it has helped or hindered the investigative process.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays