The short story “A&P” dramatizes the conflict between conformity and non-conformity. In “A&P”, the narrator, Sammy, is watching three girls in bathing suits walk through the aisles of the store, interrupting the usual flow of traffic. Customers are caught off guard by the three girl’s “indecent” attire, and are unsure of how to respond to them. Sammy says, “The sheep pushing their carts down the aisle -- the girls were walking against the usual traffic (not that we have one-way signs or anything) but there was no doubt, this jiggled them. A few house-slaves in pin curlers even looked around after pushing their carts past to make sure what they had seen was correct”(20). Sammy is noticing the three girl’s refusal to go with the flow of the social norm and is admiring their courage because after all “we don’t have one-way signs or anything” (20).…
Hoeller, Hildegard. ‘Branded From The Start’ in, Etiquette: Reflections on Contemporary Comportment, ed. by Ron Scrapp and Brian Seitz (New York, USA: State University of New York Press, 2007).…
After reading the essay titled “Neat People vs. Sloppy People”, a question was posed. What was the author’s reason for writing this piece? The reason appears to be to contrast sloppy people and neat people in order to convince the reader that sloppy people are nicer and busier than neat people. Author Suzanne Britt clearly states that she has figured out what the difference between the two is; “Neat people are lazier and meaner than sloppy people.” She conveys the idea that sloppy people have better morals than neat people and that sloppy peoples habits are a direct result of their strong morals. They set up goals that are heavenly and unattainable, yet they continue to strive to reach them, while neat people just want to make it simple. It appears that her main goal in writing this essay was to take a carefree and entertaining look at neat people and sloppy people, while making a dramatic point about their differences.…
Cited: Barry, Dave. “Batting Clean-Up and Striking Out” The Bedford Reader. Ed X. J. Kennedy,…
While living in a metropolis, the modern individual is constantly bombarded by a constant change of stimuli on a daily basis, “In order to adjust itself to the shifts and contradictions in events, it does not require the disturbances and inner upheavals which are the only means whereby more conservative personalities are able to adapt themselves to the same rhythm of events. Thus the metropolitan type creates a protective organ for itself against the profound disruption with the fluctuations and discontinuities of the external milieu that threaten it”. Unlike those of a more rural setting, whose daily activities are more common, ritualistic, and expected, the modern individual deals with rapid change in a very short amount of time. In order to cope with these constant shifts, one develops a “protective organ”. The metropolitan encounters so many individuals, the protective organ allows one to not deal with each person on an emotional or personal based level. Especially in a money based economy, personal relationships are nearly impossible. The modern individual becomes indifferent to all things personal because intellectual relationships deal with others specifically for self-gain and how can other help ones advancement. One must deal with others in a matter-of-fact attitude. People are no longer treated based off of personality or their…
When discussing sloppy people the author uses a significant amount of metaphors. As I mentioned before she uses two different tones in the essay. She is for sloppy people being the way they are, and against neat people and their actions.…
Stephen Carter’s summary “Just Be Nice” starts out by talking about how life was different back in the day compared to how life is today. Children were taught right and wrong, yes mam and no sir and just simple rules of etiquette in school. Now teachers have to be very careful on what they talk about with students. He believes that if these types of things were taught in school more openly today, then everything would be less violent.…
| As evidence that social class can be the basis for a subculture or culture within a culture, studies have shown that in child rearing, middle-class parents emphasize:…
Suzanne Britt has a strong opinion regarding sloppy people vs. neat people, throughout the reading of this article it became apparent that her opinion is in favor of sloppy people. Her distinction of neat people is that they are “bums and clods at heart”, while “sloppy people are not really sloppy. Their sloppiness is merely the unfortunate consequence of their extreme moral rectitude”. It is statements like these that would lead someone to believe that Suzanne is in favor of sloppy people.…
“ As part of the vast social project of moral leveling, it is not enough for the deviant to be normalized. The normal must be found to be deviant. Therefore, while for the criminals and the crazies deviancy has been defined down (the bar defining normality has been lowered), for the ordinary bourgeois deviancy has been defined up (the bar defining normality has been raised). Large areas of ordinary behavior hitherto considered benign have had their…
Are all neat people lazy, wasteful, insensitive, and less moral than sloppy people? Are all men more interested in sports while women focus their time on housework and cleaning? The answer to both of these questions is no. These questions bring up generalizations that are dealt with in both of the short essays which are which are as follows: “Neat People vs. Sloppy People” by Suzanne Britt, and “Batting Clean-up and Striking Out” by Dave Barry. Suzanne Britt describes the generalized behavior and mindset of neat and sloppy people, which is not a popular stereotype heard in everyday life. On the contrary, Dave Barry describes a stereotype that is absolutely heard in everyday life. It involves the ideal that women are not interested in sports…
After examining the way Charles Paul Freund deals with jeans (pg. 170), identify a comparable trend you have noticed or a change in society or culture that deserves scrutiny. It might relate to technology, entertainment, political preference, fashion, popularity of careers, or other areas. Write an analysis of the phenomenon, considering either causes or potential consequences of this new mania. Then illustrate the trend with images that suggest its cultural reach or significance. Spend some time in the opening of your paper describing the trend and establishing that it is consequential.…
In Suzanne Britt’s essay titled “Neat People vs. Sloppy People,” she is essentially making a comparison between those who are neat freaks and those who are more unorganized. It is clear that she is more on the side of those who are a little less organized. Britt says that “neat people” are selfish and unmotivated. It is clear that she is more in tune with the so called “sloppy people.”…
In Tressie McMillan Cottom’s article “The Logic of Stupid Poor People” she observes that by dressing in higher end clothes and being able to talk white, you are able to open many doors for yourselves and others. While growing up she was able to have role models who helped her see it in action. In the article Cottom mentions various things that she experienced and how dressing or not dressing in higher end clothing influenced the situation. Cottom acknowledges that there is a difference between being presentable and acceptable. To her “Presentable is the bare minimum of social civility” (Cottom 1013) while acceptable “is about gaining access to a limited set of rewards granted upon group membership”…
For all these noble reason and more, sloppy people never get neat. They aim to high and wide. They save everything, planning someday to file, order, and straighten out the world. But while these ambitious plans take clearer and clearer shape in there heads, the books spill from the shelves into the floor, the clothes pile up…