Preview

The Death Penalty Rhetorical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
625 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Death Penalty Rhetorical Analysis
The Death Penalty is an issue that has been debating for over many years. There are a lot of articles about the effect of capital punishment on the U.S society. However, not all of these articles are convincible. One example of this is “The Death Penalty Hurt Society,” by John D. Bessler. The main point of his article is about how unaffected the death penalty is to prevent crime. Additionally, he brings up some problem with the capital punishment that the U.S has to face such as the conviction of innocent and terrorism. Even though the article seems to have many facts as evidence to support the argument, the author does a very poor job delivering his message by relying on loaded words, pathos, and inductive reasoning.
One place that the author

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The arguments for the death penalty consists of Americans feeling a strong sense of justice that demands retribution for heinous crimes, or ‘a life for a life’. The death penalty shows that society doesn’t excuse the taking of innocent lives and that a jail sentence for murder wouldn’t be suffice for the life of an innocent victim. Arguments against the death penalty involve people who believe it is applied unequally, because a large proportion of those executed have been poor, uneducated, and nonwhite. My outlook on it is that I’m in-between the death penalty, yes I understand that a murder should be able to live on this Earth, but having to kill by something like legal injection is an unusual…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime is a major problem in our world today. Some people in our country live in fear that they will be the next victim of a crime; they could be robbed, raped, or even murdered. There are so many theories on how to stop crime. One of the theories is the use of the death penalty as a deterrent. There are a lot of issues that surround that idea that make the use of the death penalty just as bad as the accused committing murder. It is very contradictive, inconsistent, and unethical. Although some people believe that the death penalty deters crime, there are many arguments against it. For example, the costs are extremely high, racism is involved, and there are innocent people on death row to list a few.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not everyone has the ability to control whether they have a peaceful death or not. Dr. Philip Nitschke, pro-euthanasia activist and author of “Euthanasia: Hope You Never Need It, but Be Glad the Option Is There,” feels it is every human’s right to have a serene death. The primary goal of the article is to promote the idea that denying one the ability to die peacefully, excluding those under the age of 18 and with mental illnesses, is unethical. The author firmly believes there should be laws in place to prevent people with terminal illnesses from having to suffer through the pain of an agonizing death with no option to end their life with assisted suicide. Throughout the article, Dr. Nitschke shares logical reasons, examples, and current events surrounding the issue of euthanasia.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article “Death Penalty” by Robert Kiener gives the public a summary of what the people think about the death penalty and why is should or should not be allowed. This article starts by saying how the Boston Marathon bomber started up the debate about the death penalty being or not being allowed again and how less of the people who used to support the death penalty now no longer support it any more. Then, Robert writes that Nebraska is thinking about stopping the death penalty and how it would be interesting to see the result this will have on the people. Afterword’s Robert talks about how much the death penalty cost and the money that could be saved if stopped, there is also the fact of innocent people being accused of crimes they have not commented in the past. Next, it states how death sentences have been going down anyways and put on hold because of…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Assignment Crt 205

    • 633 Words
    • 2 Pages

    That was then and this is now; the times have changed and so have people’s views, are likely the next points those opposed will make. Have they really changed though? According to an October, 2009 Gallup Crime Survey, “65% of Americans continue to support the use of the death penalty for persons convicted of murder, while 31% oppose it” (Newport, 2009). The simple fact that America is a democratic republic makes any topic, in which a two-thirds majority favor said topic, substantial. As mentioned above, the fact that capital punishment can guarantee a criminal will not commit vicious crime in the future, leads Americans continually to remain in favor of it.…

    • 633 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retribution is the theory that the mandate to pay an offender back for his or her wrongdoing (pg. 6 Cullen). Conservatives lean in favor of this approach while liberals favor what is called “just deserts.” The difference between the two is that retribution is has the goal of ensuring that the offender endures the pain they have caused. Just desert want the offender to suffer no more than the pain caused. They wish to see that justice is served but not more than that which is truly deserved. One punishment that is considered retribution rather than rehabilitative is the death penalty. The argument that this punishment is more retribution is that the offender should suffer the same harm to which his or her inflicted on the victim. They see the…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages

    There are many differences in the way people view the death penalty. Some are against it and some agree with it. There have been many studies trying to prove or disprove a point regarding the death penalty. Some have regarded the death penalty as a hindrance, and some have regarded it as state sanctioned murder and not civilized. The death penalty has been linked to societies for hundreds of years. More recently, as we become more civilized, the death penalty has been questioned on if it is the correct way to so enforce justice on the people. The death penalty is a highly controversial subject. No one knows who’s right or who’s wrong-it’s fifty percent speculation and fifty percent research. It’s just a lot of thoughts and beliefs from people who have contributed to the death penalty controversy. Who’s right and who’s wrong? That is the question.…

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty In America

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty in the United States of America is a topic that many people could have both negative and positive reactions toward. Everyday there is a murder being made, whether it's a small type of crime or a large type of crime. Someone gets killed and justice is either served or not, depending if the murderer is caught. Some say we live in a freedom type where we are free to do whatever we want. However, that is not the case. There are laws in the United States that citizens of must follow and comprehend in order to not receive punishment. That type of punishment can vary based on the type of crime which had took place.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is an execution used as a punishment on someone convicted of a capital crime. There are several ways in which these executions have been or are being made. The most common is the lethal injection, others being electrocution, hanging, lethal gas, gas chamber, and/ or the firing squad under limited circumstances. The death penalty was first used in the U.S. in colonial times therefore leading to more than 900 executions since the year of 1976 in the U.S., with the state of Texas leading the nation (“At Issue”). There are many pros and cons that are discussed about this topic that are justifiable depending on the different points of view. Some people believe that the death…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, death penalty is a strong message for people telling them not to commit crimes. According to the group Justice for All, the murder rate in the USA dropped from 10.2 (per 100,000) in 1980 to 5.7 (per 100,000) in 1999 (Jacoby, 2002). There is a reduction of 44 %. Moreover, in 2008 there was the lowest number of executions since 1994. Only 37 criminals were executed after committing a murder. Based on these statistics, when injustice is not tolerated, crime decreases (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_United_States).…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays