Preview

The Death Penalty Debate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
920 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Death Penalty Debate
In discussions of the death penalty, one controversial issue has been is it a good idea for the United States to use. On one hand, proponents argue that the death penalty is good for America. On the other hand, opponents contend that the death penalty is a horrible . Others even maintain stating that the death penalty costs america billions of dollars; however, my own view is that the death penalty is a useful and simplistic way of dealing with extravagant criminals. Death penalty is a just punishment for crimes committed against the rights to life, freedom and safety of victims. It deters would-be criminals to commit felonies. It is constitutional and does not violate the Eighth Amendment which prohibits the federal government from imposing …show more content…
Murder is the crime society wants to prevent the most, it should use the highest form of punishment to defend families of victims and this is the death penalty. If more murders were executed by use of the death penalty then potential murders would think twice before committing the crime because of the fear of losing their life. For years, criminologists analyzed murder rates to visually perceive if they fluctuated with the likelihood of convicted murderers being executed, but the results were inconclusive. But in 1973 Isaac Ehrlich employed an incipient kind of study, the study found that for every inmate executed there were 7 lives that were spared because other would be malefactors were deterred from committing the malefaction. If some studies are inconclusive it's because the death penalty is infrequently utilized and even when it is the process takes years to determinately be set in place and executed. The fact that some states have lower malefaction rates and do not utilize the death penalty is not because they have some other remotely deterrent or that they are more halcyon because they do not utilize it, is mendacious. Because if the states that do utilize the death penalty did not utilize it the states would have even higher rates of malefaction than they already do.Through use of the death penalty crime rates can be deterred because a murder executed can not murder again …show more content…
Once there is punishment for every guilty criminal there will finally be equality for every criminal. Family members of victims go on to t.v. and show how dreadful and sorrowful they are mourning their loss, Their emotions show that they want justice for their loss, I believe that justice can only be the solution for families to be relieved. A serious crime calls for a serious penalty and that would be death, Like the saying goes “An eye for an eye,” if a murder kills someone then their punishment should be death to themselves.People who oppose death penalty claim that in the implementation of this capital punishment, innocent men are wrongly executed. According to "ProDeathPenalty" , there has never been any proof of it. Moreover, our criminal justice system takes extra precautions to be sure the innocent are protected. What's the use of the judges who were trained in this field? They also want to make sure who is guilty and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Philosopher Emmanuel Kant made an argument stating that killing someone for deterrence is using them as a tool, and it is unjust within itself (Pojman 70). Many think that by having the death penalty as a consequence for first degree murder, the rates of homicide will drop, because it will “put fear into the hearts of people”(Costanzo 96), but that is not correct. In a survey done by the Death Penalty Information Center, the number of murders in a state implementing the death penalty within the last twenty years have been higher than in a state without the penalty. As recently as 2010, the murder rate of states with the penalty was 25% greater than states without the penalty (“Deterrence”). Those statistics show that although the law may stop a few individuals, it is not a considerable enough number to call it deterrence.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper, the authors examine how the death penalty argument has changed in the last 25 years in the United States. They examine six specific issues: deterrence, incapacitation, caprice and bias, cost innocence and retribution; and how public opinion has change regarding these issues. They argue that social science research is changing the way Americans view the death penalty and suggest that Americans are moving toward an eventual abolition of the death penalty.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime is a major problem in our world today. Some people in our country live in fear that they will be the next victim of a crime; they could be robbed, raped, or even murdered. There are so many theories on how to stop crime. One of the theories is the use of the death penalty as a deterrent. There are a lot of issues that surround that idea that make the use of the death penalty just as bad as the accused committing murder. It is very contradictive, inconsistent, and unethical. Although some people believe that the death penalty deters crime, there are many arguments against it. For example, the costs are extremely high, racism is involved, and there are innocent people on death row to list a few.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has always been a huge controversial issue in the United States. Some states have legalized this punishment while others do not agree and sentence defendants to life in prison instead. Capital punishment, or the death penalty is a legal sentence to die for criminal behavior. It varies from state to state how the execution of the convicted criminal is carried out. Just like every controversial issue there is always two viewpoints. The first is that law enforcement and juries make errors and capital punishment cannot be reversed. The second is that certain crimes are so heinous that the perpetrator deserves to die. There are many pros and cons related to the death penalty. The question has always been, do psychopaths with no regard for human life deserve to live or should they be put to death with the same coldness that they showed to their victims.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We’re only ­human, we all make mistakes." The death penalty has been the highest form of criminal punishment in the American judicial system since the 13 colonies. There has been many forms of the death penalty like hanging, stoning, drowning, burning, beheading, gasing, electrocution, and injection. The taking of a man's life as punishment for criminal behavior is wrong. The moral injustice of murder, the cruelty of execution, and the death of innocent men are all concerns that make the death penalty wrong. The government should abolish the death penalty in order to observe morality, end cruelty, and protect innocent men. What is the death penalty?…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A sixteen- year-old is prosecuted in adult court and is given the life sentence without any chance at parole. He doesn’t understand what is happening. His brain isn’t developed like any adults, nor does her comprehend the court surroundings. He is practically a victim to the justice system as he is being treated the same as a thirty-year-old criminal. Any offender under the age of twenty-one should be separated from adults in the justice system.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But does murder solve murders? According to multiple scientific studies, they don’t. In fact, in states without the death penalty, the crime rate is lower than the states that do. North Carolina’s crime rates dropped almost immediately after executions stopped. In a 2008 survey, criminologists and police chiefs around the country ranked the use of the death penalty at the bottom of a list of effective crime fighting tools. They said that more law enforcement resources were the most needed tool for reducing violent…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people are against the killing of others for any reasons. Other people feel that certain crimes should be punished by death. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of years, because people's life is at risk. The reviewing the numbers of facts prove that the death penalty should not be enforced. I think death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. It should be abolished in this country it's racial discrimination, the financial cost and barbarity.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    death penalty

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Death penalty is a legal process in which a person who commits a crime that is so unconceivable is put to death by the state. When we look at it at a certain point of view, we can see that the death penalty system in action can be used as a deterrent to society who might want to commit a crime. They use fear to control the society to stop them from committing heinous crimes. But on the other hand it can be used as an act of revenge or retribution just to satisfy their need for justice. It may have its advantage and disadvantage but the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. The system is seriously flawed and the risk of convicting an innocent man to death is still possible, even with great technological advances it can’t guarantee that we can execute the right person. Suspects are being executed even though the evidences against them are not convincing. In my opinion we can only execute a person if we are sure that they committed the crime but if there is a chance that he is innocent, that person should not be executed.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead of preventing violence, capital punishment is having a "brutalizing effect", increasing the level of violence in society. Thus it is rising not lowering the murder rates. The states that have the death penalty do not have lower crime or murder rates than the states that do not have the death penalty. The thirty-eight states with the death penalty wrongly convince society that the government has taken effective measures to prevent crime and homicide. In reality…

    • 905 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays