Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Death Penalty Argumentative Essay

Good Essays
499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Death Penalty Argumentative Essay
Abolish Death Penalty Although death penalty is a fair punishment, I am against it because it is another form of murder which is an inhumane act. Death penalty is capital punishment wherein a criminal proven guilty of a major crime is sentenced to death by the government. I am against the death penalty and can prove in my essay that abolishing it would be a better choice. Death penalty decreases crime for the reason that people fear nothing more than death (Van Den Haag, 1983). By executing criminals, the people are protected from future crimes. Although it is a logical reason, there is no credible evidence that the death penalty decreases crimes (ACLU, 2007). States that practice death penalty do not lower crime rates compared to states which have only life time imprisonment as the highest form of punishment. Both punishments show the same results as thoroughly researched by the social science research in America (ACLU, 2007). Crimes interfere with the peace and order of a society (Budziszewski, 2004). Appropriate punishment which is just and equitable can restore the peace and order. Making the criminal pay for the crime with an equivalent punishment is acceptable. But killing a person who killed another person is just making the violent act again in another form (Schroth, 2008). In terms of cost, death penalty costs more than life time imprisonment. A person sentenced to death pays more because of more trials, resulting to more fees. Capital punishment requires more trials because a life will be taken away (Dieter, 2007). The death penalty also risks an innocent life being sentenced to death. Some who agree with the death penalty says that everybody makes mistakes and the death penalty should not be abolished for that reason (Stewart, 2008). Since life is the greatest thing that can be taken away from a person, one innocent life must not suffer death in place of the true criminal. When life is at hand, risking it is not an option (Feingold, 2000). Lastly, death penalty is morally accepted because it is a way of justice for the victims. The society would gain back its peace and order when the criminals are never to be seen in this earth again (Fein, 2008). On the contrary, killing is a sin; there is no doubt about it. Humans become inhumane and immoral when they take away another human life. Death penalty is immoral also for the fact that it is not fair for everybody. Criminals who are rich can buy their way out of their punishment (Stevenson, 2004). The death penalty should be abolished and should never be an option of punishment. Life time imprisonment without patrol can be equivalent and satisfying way of punishment for the criminals. In conclusion, life time imprisonment should be the highest form of punishment instead of death.

Reference
ACLU. (Apr. 9, 2007). The death penalty: Questions and answers. ACLU.org. Retrieved March 16, 2012, from http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=002000.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is a controversial topic that has existed since the beginning of civilization. The death penalty, and capital punishment are interchangeable terms that provide legalized murders at the hands of the government. This form of killing is permitted in approximately 38 states (Capital Punishment, 2011). The death penalty has been a way for humans to control one another throughout history. The death penalty is a chancy way of instilling justice. In addition, there is no guarantee that the person sentenced to death is completely innocent. For many years, the death penalty has been the cause of many innocent and untimely deaths. The death penalty is a final decision to a possible mistake. Also, the death penalty infringes on…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death penalty is the punish meant of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime and there are twenty-two countries in the world that still impose the death penalty for capital crimes, the United states is one of them. If you are charged with capital homicide, and the jury of twelve of your peers proclaims, “We find the defendant guilty as charged”(Condenaststore). Then it is simple, you are going to forfeit your life, so abolishing the death penalty or there’s no coming back from the grave.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opponents of the capital punishment also claim that the whole principle of the death penalty is overshadowed by the proven risk of executing innocent people and that the avoidable killing of such people can never be justified. And according to Amnesty International, there were more than 400 known cases of wrongful convictions for capital offenses in the U.S. between 1900 and 1991. These facts will of course make a good standing point for the opponents of the capital punishment but its supporters argue that these problems are caused not by the principle itself but its failed implementation and that the opponents use such cases to cloud the real issue.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thesis statement: Nevertheless Death penalty is unethical and inhumane; it helps to achieve the balance in the country.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital punishment, otherwise known as the death penalty, has been effective tool in our country’s justice system since its inception. When an inmate is given this, the harshest sentence available, it is always with just cause. Capital Punishment is an important tool in our criminal justice system today and there are several reasons it should remain in effect.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    But does murder solve murders? According to multiple scientific studies, they don’t. In fact, in states without the death penalty, the crime rate is lower than the states that do. North Carolina’s crime rates dropped almost immediately after executions stopped. In a 2008 survey, criminologists and police chiefs around the country ranked the use of the death penalty at the bottom of a list of effective crime fighting tools. They said that more law enforcement resources were the most needed tool for reducing violent…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O 'Connor said in a speech in 2001 to a group of women lawyers in Minnesota "the system may well be allowing some innocent defendants to be executed” (“Innocence”). It has been said that if capital punishment disappears in the United States it won’t be because voters and politicians no longer want to execute the guilty (Douthat 7). It will be because they 're afraid of executing the innocent (Douthat 7). "A government that cannot guarantee the absolute accuracy of its proceedings should not take to itself the power of taking a human life," said Senator Martin Looney, referring to the Tillman case (Williams 55-56). While interviewing certain people about this issue there was a statement made by a person that really caught my attention she said “...The death penalty should not be a closure to a family because another person is being killed, when God should be the one making that decision. Remember, two wrongs don’t make a…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Putting people to death, judged to have committed certain extremely heinous crimes, is a practice that’s been around for along time. In the later half of the twentieth century, it has become a controversial issue. As a supporter of the death penalty, I consider this to be a good thing for my country and its citizens. Capital punishment deters crime. Statistics prove consisted application of the death penalty deter crime. No executed murdered has ever killed again. For many years, Criminologists have thought to believe the death penalty has no affect as deterrence to homicides. From 1972-1976, a suspension was place on capital punishment. The United States had 9,140 murders in 1960 where 56 people were executed. Nine years Later in 1969 where the United States had zero executions, their were 14,590 murders. After only 2 executions since 1976, murders rised to 23,040. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, It would put fear of capital punishment into the "would be" murderers. A person is less likely to commit a crime if they believe that they will be punished for their criminal act.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Someones Life Story

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty does not keep us safer. homicides rates for the states that use the death penalty are going higher than for those states that don't.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a method that the justice system uses to punish wrong doers for centuries, but as of late has become a hot issue of debate. There are many reasons that surround the debate of the death penalty one of them being due to the harshness of the punishment itself. People against the death penalty argue that the death penalty is a violation of the 8th amendment due to it being a cruel and an unusual punishment. Others argue that it is not. Some argue if the cost of the death penalty is worth it while others argue that it is. Although both have their own views, in the end, the death penalty is nonetheless a useless tool for safety.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    And some argue that states with the death penalty have a higher crime rates than states that don’t have the death penalty. However, every state is different in that each state has differences in population, number of cities and crime rates. For example, urbanized states are more likely to have higher crime rates. Also, states that have the death penalty are obliged to have it because of their higher crime rates and not the other way around. Let’s look at some facts. In fact, in 1960, there were 56 executions and 9,140 murders. In 1964, fifteen executions and 9,250 and in 1969 there were no executions. There was a temporary suspension on capital punishment from 1972 to 1976. During this time there were no executions and 20,510 murders. In 1980 there were 23,040 murders with only two executions since 1976. Between 1965 and 1980 the annual murders was from 9,960 to 23,040, which is a 131 percent increase. This is strong evidence that execution is a deterrent of murder. Furthermore, in the state of Texas, has the highest execution rate of any other state. Specifically, the murder rate in 1991 was 15.3 per 100,000 people. By 1999, the rate had fallen to 6.1, a 60 percent drop. In Harris County, Texas, which has the most aggressive death penalty prosecutions, as a result of the resumption of executions in 1982, the murders per year dropped from 701 to 241. That’s a 72…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deterrent Death Penalty

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The authors, Michael L. Radelet and Ronald L Akers, Professors of Sociology, Center for Studies in Criminology and Law, University of Florida, explains that America’s top criminologist has demonstrated that the death penalty does little to reduce rates of criminal violence. They used statistics gathered over the years about the death penalty and deterrent effects and used those to ask questions to criminologist, general public, and police chiefs. By using many expert opinions they seem unbiased. These statistics would help support one of the lack of deterrent effect of the death penalty.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If murder is the willful deprivation of a victim’s right to life, then the justice system’s willful deprivation of the criminal’s right to the same is—even if overly severe—a punishment which fits the most severe crime that can be committed. Without capital punishment, it could be argued that the justice system makes no provision in response to the crime of murder, and thus provides no justice for the…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty Paper

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The death penalty is not cruel or excessive. Rather, it is a necessary reaction to heinous crimes, and is a most suitable punishment for capital offenders. Seventy-five percent of Americans support the death penalty, according to Turner, because it provides a deterrent to some would-be murderers and it also provides for moral and legal justice (83). Deterrence is a theory that weighs the effectiveness of a punishment (does it reduce the crime rate?) and makes testable predictions, such as the idea that punishment reduces the crime rate compared to what it would be without a credible threat of punishment (Van Den Haag 29). The deterrent effect of any punishment depends on how quickly the…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays