Preview

The Current Employment Relations Issue of Unfair Dismissal and Pregnancy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3306 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Current Employment Relations Issue of Unfair Dismissal and Pregnancy
The Current Employment Relations Issue of Unfair Dismissal and Pregnancy

A recent employment relations concern deals with unfair dismissal. When an employee is dismissed for certain statutory reasons, is inequitable and is incompatible to the merits of the situation; this phenomenon is known as unfair dismissal. This has been a long debated issue concerning all participants in the employment relationship. Investigation of the current employment relations issue of unfair dismissal found that emphasis is placed on a case that was recently heard by the Industrial Relations Commission on sexual discrimination because the employee was pregnant. This essay will discuss the nature and significance of the issue. It will also describe the roles of the actors in the employment relationship and the tactics that were employed in order to achieve an outcome.

The once rigid unfair dismissal legislations have of recently undergone re-appraisal by the Australian Government. As such modifications were made in order to free up employer prerogatives with respect to the dismissal of unproductive employees. The following section is a literature review of the topic of unfair dismissal. The Herald Express (2005) argued the scale of protection that the workers have when they take part in a strike. As a result, two legislative laws surface; firstly, an employee is protected against dismissal for twelve weeks or longer if the employer doesn 't try to resolve the disagreement. If the employee gets fired within this period it automatically becomes unfair dismissal even if the employees haven 't been employed for a full year. However, if the employee breaks the contract and refuses to work and goes into strike without a vote being held, they can be dismissed straight away. In this instance it is not classified as unfair dismissal. Lamount (2005) discusses section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and mentions the potential reasons for unfair dismissal according. These reasons include;



References: Accounting age (2005).Tough guys are a liability. Accounting age. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2005). Labour Force Australia, Australia, August Figures (No. 6202.0). Canberra, ACT: Author. Colvin, A. (2003). The Dual Transformation of Workplace Dispute Resolution, Industrial Relations, 42, 4, 712-735. Cunningham, I., James, P. & Dibben, P., (2004), Bridging the Gap between Rhetoric and Reality: Line Managers and the Protection of Job Security for Ill Workers In the Modern Workplace, British Journal of Management, 15, 273-290. D 'Art, D. & Turner, T. (2003). Independent Collective Representation: Providing Effectiveness, Fairness and Democracy in the Employment Relationship, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 15, 169-181 Goldman, L Harcourt, M., Lam, H. & Harcourt, S. (2005). Unions and Discriminatory Hiring: Evidence from New Zealand, Industrial Relations, 44, 2, 364-372. Herald Express (2005).Dismissal during an industrial dispute. Herald Express. Human Rights. (2004). Women, Work and Equity. Retrieved 19 September 2005, from http://www.hreoc.gov.au/sex_discrimination/20thanniversary/women_ work_equity/speeches/goward.html Knight, K.G Lamount, M. (2005). Staying on the right side of the law. Occupational health, Jan, 19-21 Liquor, Hospitality & Miscellaneous Union (2005) McMullen, J. (1999).Ignorance is no defense. Journal of administrative Management, may/june, 18-21. Nankervis, A., Compton, R. & Baird, M. (2002). Strategic Human Resource Management. Thomson Education, Australia. Orton, P. ( 2005). Time for fair go on unfair dismissal law. Australian Financial Review. Oslington, P Switzer, P. (2005). Unions muscle for a piece of the unfair action. The Australian. Williams, A. (1993).The pregnant employee 's right- A guide to your legal rights. A woman in management review, 8, 1, 27- 30.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Commonwealth vs. Hunt

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Taylor, Benjamin, and Witney, Fred. U.S. Labor Relations Law. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992.…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Agency Workers

    • 13564 Words
    • 55 Pages

    This contribution will analyse the concept of unfair dismissal and how it applies to agency workers in the context of both UK common law cases and statutory provisions introduced by the UK parliament, with a view to reaching some…

    • 13564 Words
    • 55 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bama Inc.

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Unions in the spotlight: What employers can and can 't do - HR Specialist. (n.d.). The HR Specialist - Employment law and human resources solutions. Retrieved from http://www.thehrspecialist.com/article.aspx?articleid=36119…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 5 Assigment 3

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reasonable accommodation of a religious belief must be made by the employer if such accommodation does not compromise the rights of others does not require lots of cash.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Employment Rights Act 1996 - It deals with rights can get when at work including unfair dismissal, reasonable dismissal notice, redundancy and more.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A meeting was held with myself, my supervisor and the HR Department, the result was that Sam would be terminated on the basis of serious misconduct.. A letter was sent by registered mail to Sam’s personal address. It was two days later that the unfair dismissal claim was filed by Sam with Fair work Australia.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    2. How to ensure that the dismissals are fair and the importance of this to both the employer and employee.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Zullo, R. (2008). Union membership and political inclusion. Industrial & labor relations review, 62(1), 22-38.…

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Labour Canada (2007). Maternity Leave: Work and Family Provisions in Canadian Collective Agreements. Retrieved from http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/lp/spila/wlb/wfp/11maternity_leave.shtml#tphp…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this short news clip was very informative as it discussed a case about a young girl whom sued her place of employment due to wrongful treatment while pregnant. In this clip Anahita Sedaghatfar discusses that you may fire a pregnant worker, you just can’t fire them due to being pregnant. She does not believe the young girl had a valid reason for suing.…

    • 3228 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfair Cruel Laws

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case of the valid reason, employers need to establish the misconduct on the "balance of probabilities". A rigorous investigation of the circumstances is often a key element of satisfying that burden of proof. Employers need to ensure that they have sought and taken into account all relevant evidence and properly tested it and that, prior to any dismissal decision, they have given the employee an opportunity to respond to any allegations against them, including having given them sufficient detail of the matters that may form the basis for dismissal.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Camilleri v IBM Australia Limited [2014] FWC 5894 case, the company was forced to reinstate the employee for the sole reason that he had been working with the company for 17 years, taking into consideration the employee’s term of service. This is simply unfair as a long term of service does not make up for a serious grievance, especially as his service was riddled with warnings and his inability to work at an acceptable standard. However, this is not the most unjust case, as in Anderson v Thiess Pty Ltd [2014] FWC 6568, the employer was forced to reimburse the employee undeterred by the sending of an extremely racist email, clearly breaching the company policy. The terms for the order of the reimbursement are even more ridiculous, citing the employee’s age (thus difficulty in finding another job) and the “over reliance on a previous verbal warning”. It is even stated in the Unfair Dismissal laws that an employee “could be fired instantly on the terms of a serious breach of the company’s policy”, yet it is found that despite this, even with a verbal warning, it is unfair to terminate the employee. In addition, it takes into account the employee’s age; the employer does not take into account the employee’s age when hiring(to do so would be a breach of anti-discriminatory laws), yet it must be taken into account when terminating the employee. This is extremely unjust to the employer as the Fair Work Commission is manipulating discrimination of the employee’s age. After the termination, the employee’s age is not taken into account when hiring, thus invalidating this reason. The Fair Work Commission manipulates evidence and laws when ordering a reimbursement, showing the unfairness of the Unfair dismissal laws to the…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pregnancy in the workplace is a fundamental human rights issue of equality of opportunity between women and men. Women should not suffer negative consequences in the workplace simply because they are pregnant. Workplace rules and job functions may affect a pregnant employee differently than other employees. For example, in this case, the employer refused to hire the job applicant who was pregnant for 7 months, because of the period of her pregnancy and that she would not be able to carrying heavy supplies from delivery vans into the kitchen, although she was willing to carry moderately heavy ones. This example shows the job applicant receiving differential treatment and negative consequences.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before 1978, women who became pregnant while employed had a lot more than their health to be concerned about. There were no laws in place to help protect them from discrimination. In those days, pregnancy was considered a disability. Many women were simply fired the moment their employer found out about their condition. In some cases, women were forced to resign as soon as their baby belly began to show, or at the end of the first trimester of pregnancy.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Last year alone, hundreds of adverse rulings were slapped upon scores of companies, resulting to millions of liabilities. It is sad to note that many employers today, either abetted by their HR and personnel managers, or against the professional advice of HR and lawyers, do not really adhere to the provisions of the Labor Code, on the rules of dealing with their own workers in the matter of discipline and dismissal. Despite all the seminars, workshops and symposia, that HR personnel attend regularly, management never seems to learn. The result could be very damaging, if not disastrous. An adverse decision by the NLRC and the Supreme Court entails not only an order to reinstate workers and pay them full backwages but also moral and exemplary damages. The greatest damage is upon the good name and corporate image and goodwill of the companies, or an irreparable damage on the harmonious relations between employees and management, resulting to declines in productivity, quality and profits.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays