Preview

“…the Courts Can and Often Do, Draw Aside the Veil. They Can, and Often Do, Pull Off the Mask. They Look to See What Really Lies Behind. the Legislature Has Shown the Way… the Courts Should Follow Suit”.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4004 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“…the Courts Can and Often Do, Draw Aside the Veil. They Can, and Often Do, Pull Off the Mask. They Look to See What Really Lies Behind. the Legislature Has Shown the Way… the Courts Should Follow Suit”.
Law of Business Associations

Assessed Coursework
Question 1 (a) Essay

“…The courts can and often do, draw aside the veil. They can, and often do, pull off the mask. They look to see what really lies behind. The legislature has shown the way… the courts should follow suit”.[1]

When a company is incorporated, it is treated as a separate legal entity, distinct from its promoters, directors, members and employees and hence the concept of the corporate veil, separating those entities from the corporate body has arisen. The nature of corporate personality can be analysed by reference to the celebrated case of Salomon v. A. Salomon & Co. Ltd.[2] Indeed it has been said that Salomon forms a cornerstone of company law and that the separate legal identity of a company stands as a fundamental principle[3] of our English law.[4]

In modern English company law, the principle of the separate legal identity of the company is still firmly adhered to and the principle of Salomon has been upheld over time. However Salomon itself and subsequent judgements have indicated possible exceptions to the separate entity concept. Lord Halsbury recognised the separate entity providing there was: “… no fraud… and no agency and if the company was a real one and not a fiction or a myth”.[5]

It is, however, evident that the courts are prepared to abandon the strict view of Salomon[6] and disregard the principle in certain circumstances in order to reveal human culpability. Some researchers argue that the courts have become increasingly willing to lift the veil,[7] while others suggest that it will only be lifted (or extended) in very specific circumstances - in order to restrain the corporate personality by “reaching it through its shareholders”.[8]

It has also been suggested that all of the common law exceptions to the principle of separate corporate identity are simply symptomatic of the courts attempt to ensure that all parties involved are not disadvantaged by the actions of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ian M Ramsay Harold Ford Professor of Commercial Law and Director, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation The University of Melbourne David B Noakes Solicitor, Allen Allen & Hemsley, Sydney, and Research Associate, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation The University of Melbourne There is a significant amount of literature by commentators discussing the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil. However, there has not been a comprehensive empirical study of the Australian cases relating to this doctrine. In this article, the authors present the results of the first such study. Some of the findings are (i) there has been a substantial increase in the number of piercing cases heard by courts over time; (ii) courts are more prepared to pierce the corporate veil of a proprietary company than a public company; (iii) piercing rates decline as the number of shareholders in companies increases; (iv) courts pierce the corporate veil less frequently when piercing is sought against a parent company than when piercing is sought against one or more individual shareholders; and (v) courts pierce more frequently in a contract context than in a tort context. ____________________________________________________________…

    • 15226 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legt 2741 Assignment

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages

    However, the precedent in the Saloman Case is not gospel and the ‘corporate veil’ can be lifted in certain circumstances . If the company is used:…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Baxt, R., and Fletcher, K.L., Fridman, S., Corporations and Associations Cases and Materials on, Butterworths, Australia, 10th edition, 2008.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Larson, A. (2004, August). Piercing the Corporate Veil. Retrieved September 27, 2008, from ExpertLaw: http://www.expertlaw.com/library/business/corporate_veil.html…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was held that in “any legal proceedings in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company, the proper claimant is the company”. Although logical on its face, the rule presented multitudinous frustration for courts over the years.…

    • 3255 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    corporate veil

    • 2460 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The doctrine of corporate veil emanate from the ruling of the case of Salomon vs Salomon 1897, whose facts are as follows:…

    • 2460 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company Law

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The required characteristic of a company is that it exists as a separate legal entity from its members of the company. The separate legal entity was authoritatively established by the House of Lord (HOL) in the case of Salomon v Salomon (1897). The distinction between a company and its members as different legal person sometimes called veil of incorporation.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    In regardless of the jurisdictions, it is generally accepted that shareholders among a corporation are not liable for the obligations of the corporation in the circumstance where exceed their investments in the corporation. However, this limited liability is not absolute that make shareholders exempted from corporation obligations. In certain circumstances, the separate legal person of a corporation can be discharged and treat the shareholders and the corporation as one, which is known as piercing the corporation veil (Kershaw, 2009: 46). The principle of piercing the corporation veil is to examine the application of limited liability and refrain shareholders from abusing limited liability to obtain illegitimate ends. It is important to mention that this rule plays a relatively small role under British company law, while has not frequently been applied by Australian courts. And this rule is regularly criticised as vague, confused and unpredictable under United States corporate law (Xi, 2011: 413). Under the comparative background, China embraced the rule of piercing the corporation veil in 2005, in which the first national 1993 corporation law was revamped, has came as a surprise. Therefore, this essay is going to analyze the actuality of implement this rule and what challenges this new rules have been faced under Chinese jurisdictions. A profound case which have originated the rule of piercing the corporation veil will be traced back at first, followed by the legal basis of this rule, and then introduced evolvement of piercing the corporation in China’s practice, implement actuality of this rule and some proposals will be discussed at last.…

    • 3719 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corporation

    • 7965 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Under the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil, the courts may decide not observe the separation of the corporate entity from its stockholders, and it may deem the corporation 's acts to be those of the persons or organizations actually controlling the corporation. This is based upon a finding by the court that the corporate form is used to perpetuate a fraud, circumvent a statute, or accomplish some other wrongful or inequitable purpose. A court may pierce through the veil of liability protection if the corporation does not follow proper corporate formalities, if it is undercapitalized, or if it can be shown that it is a sham that was set up to defraud.…

    • 7965 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Company Law

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The principle of separate legal entity under the law is a company, upon incorporation, will becomes a body corporate that exists separately with its owner and distinct from its individual members and directors. This fundamental principle of company law was first established in the landmark case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd (1897), and formed the foundation of company law in Malaysia. Besides, this principle distinguishes a company from a partnership.…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    company law

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The corporate personality with separate legal identity of company confirms about the limited liability of the shareholders. The concept of separate legal personality of the company is illustrated by the famous case Salomon v A. Salomon & Co Ltd (1897) AC 22 (HL)1.According to section 15(1) company Act 2006 a company becomes a separate legal person. Company can be two type : Private limited company(Ltd)and Public limited company(plc). The structure of a private limited company qualifies in two ways :1.limited by guarantee and 2.limited by share. Limited will not offer share to public2.In 1862 formation of a company required seven or more subscribers, where now company may run with one director3.The Companies Act 2006 provides that remedies are available for the breach of directors duties, remain case stated law distinct from statute law and many cases interpreting provision of past Companies Act remain relevant today.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Beings are generally legal person but humanity is a state of nature and legal personality is an artificial construct, which may or may not be conferred. The origin of corporation lies in a logical extension of this separation of humanity from legal personality as the group of humans who are engaged in a common activity could attempt to simplify their joint activity by gaining legal personality from the venture.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1897 the case of Salomon v A. Salomon & Co. Ltd was concluded, a highly regarded case within company law due to the Separate Entity Principle outlined, the principal which became widely known as the Salomon Principle. This piece will summarise the case in order to identify the importance it has in company law, along with identifying under what circumstance the Salomon Principle might be ignored by the courts. The final section will conclude with a subjective view of the Salomon Principle.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    i) This principle of legal personality was first distinctly articulated in the British House of Lords Judgment in the case of Salomon Vs. Salmon & Company Limited (1897) AC 22 At the court of first instance and appeal court, it was held That therefore the company was a legal entity capable of a separate existence and liable to pay its own debts, and Salomon was not personally liable to pay the debts of the company.…

    • 24789 Words
    • 100 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision of House of Lord 's in the case of Salomon V A Salomon & Co Ltd�, which now referred to as the 'Salomon ' principle established this principal of separate identity of the company�.…

    • 4744 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays