Preview

The Corollary (Roosevelt's Big Stick)

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
143 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Corollary (Roosevelt's Big Stick)
Roosevelt's Big Stick was based on the African saying speak softly and carry a big stick. Roosevelt's Corollary was an addition to the Monroe Doctrine, which basically told Europe to stay out of the Western Hemisphere. The corollary said that the U.S. would now use force to protect its economic interests in Latin America. It's goal was to keep things going well in Latin America as long as it benefited the U.S. Wilson's missionary diplomacy said that the United States had a moral responsibility to deny recognition to any Latin American government it viewed as oppressive, undemocratic, or hostile to U.S. interests. They were similar in that they both sought to keep things going well in Latin America, but while Roosevelt's corollary was enacted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    "Walk softly, but carry a big stick." This phrase was characterized by Roosevelt’s foreign policy, Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. The Roosevelt Corollary was created in 1904. A corollary is a statement that follows readily from a previous statement. The Dominican Republic was becoming more in debt with European countries. So, Roosevelt’s solution was to make a corollary that…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The central idea from “State of the Union Address (1941)” is communicated through observations, examples, and expert testimony. For instance, Roosevelt begins a section of his address with the observation that the elements of a healthy and strong democracy are those people intuitively understand. This supports the central idea. For example, Roosevelt cites specific ways of how to improve the social economy. For expert testimony, Roosevelt expresses confidence in the American people. All of these details support Roosevelt's central idea that the nation can meet the challenges of the new…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roosevelt wanted to achieve military superiority in the Carribean, so he behaved incorrectly in the relation to the representatives of the Latin American countries. When the Colombian parliament refused to sell the rights to build the Panama Canal to the U.S., Roosevelt offended politicians and supported the independence of Panama, which allowed him to seize Panama strategic base. In addition, in 1904, according to the "Monroe Doctrine," the United Stated took over the function of customs control in the Dominican Republic. In 1903, Cuba also had to give away its Guantanamo strategic base in favor of the United States. In conclusion, I would say that Theodore Roosevelt was a great politician. He held an efficient and pragmatic internal policies that allowed to resolve the country's economic situation. This actually allowed the U.S. to take a leading positionin the global economy. However, as Roosevelt wanted to dominate in the Caribbean he was held quite an aggressive policy with respect to Latin American…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On December 2, 1823, the president at the time, who was James Monroe announced that the U.S. would not resist the efforts of any European nations. This soon became known as the Monroe Doctrine. In 1776, when the US broke from Britain, there was a long, slow process of decolonization. The in early 19 century, independent nations started to form in South America, the Caribbean, and Central America. Soon, British sought to join the US because of their opposition to recolonization. Monroe and John Quincy Adams rejected the idea immediately, leaving no room for negotiations. When President Roosevelt came into office, he started this new policy. Which became known as the "Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine". Then in 1930, it was declared…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, the Big Stick policy encouraged imperialism in surrounding countries. According to Hodge, the Big Stick diplomacy had ‘five central foundations’, which included(). In summary it meant that America had interest in the surrounding countries such as Venezuela and Panama. Meaning America had a position of authority and no threat from European countries like Britain and Spain, who known for their empire’s at the time. The most notable example of Teddy Roosevelt Big Stick diplomacy was in 1902 when Roosevelt threated Britain and Germany to send 54 war ships. If they did not allow Venezuela to accept international arbitration.[30] Ferguson concludes that around this time Britain recognised United States ‘as one of those rival empires enough to be worthy of appeasement’.[31] This is seen with America agreeing the Platt agreement in 1903, which gave the US the right to intervene in Cuba’s domestic and foreign affairs. [29] It meant that America could be a great power and that delegation that Roosevelt had influence within the Latin countries. It shows that imperialism is shown with the beliefs behind the Big Stick diplomacy. America were acting in South America to maintain their influence over the Latin countries on their…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Woodrow Wilson was the President of the United States during the 20th century. During this time, many nations were going to war with each other. Wilson’s job as a president was to protect his country from harm. He always advocated for peace and neutrality and didn't want to get the US involved in this mess. Little did he know, Wilson had a huge decision to make during his time as president.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being Jewish anywhere in the world was hard in the 1930s and 40s. Almost all know about German jewish hardship, the systematic slaughter of millions of jews in death camps across Hitler’s empire, but what many do not understand is that anti-semitism was incredibly strong in the United States as well. However, in a time when almost none stood by their side, Franklin Delano Roosevelt seemed the only world leader who cared. However, his cabinet did not share his welcoming attitude, and attempted to sabotage him. Although Roosevelt demonstrated that he did care about saving the Jews, his administration perpetrated systematic denial of Jewish entry to the country. Because he did not do enough to investigate this until it was too late, he is…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roosevelt and Wilson were both important figures in the nation. Each one had to lead the United States into a world war. While in Roosevelt’s speech it is clearly stated that the country should go to war, Wilson’s speech leaves it open to debate. However, it is assumed that Wilson wants the country to go to war. Both presidents use determinism in their speeches, which is that all actions have sufficient causes.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wilson has done this through inspiring the Vietnam War through his ideas.The wilson created idea that inspired the war was Moral Diplomacy. It was a concept that wilson used during his presidency that called for U.S to share it’s values to the world. The whole point of the war was to give vietnam the value of capitalism. If Woodrow Wilson never had the idea of Moral Diplomacy if he didn’t have that idea people would be like leave vietnam alone because before Wilson the U.S was isolationist. Wilson affected other places in the world like the philippines by helping them getting independence by getting the Jones Act passed. This act promised liberty for the philippines and eventually it gave them…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Both former Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson term in office contributed to the increase of working class Americans. Each of the presidents was part of Progressive era, where people mattered. They both had different political views. President Roosevelt was a Republican and President Wilson was a Democrat. However, they both have had strong foreign policies to protect the United States allies. President Roosevelt built a strong Navy program and built National Parks in the United States. On the other hand, Wilson wanted to ensure authority over unions. Even though both of these presidents had different views, their aim was the same: to create a better United States.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1930s Franklin Roosevelt chose to deal with the serious economic crises, and he believed that this was the action that would win people’s belief. Even though Roosevelt thought that the United States should play an active role in international affairs, he still reaffirmed American that the United States would not interfere in the affairs of others. Finally he won the election in 1933 since most of Americans wanted to go with isolationism. Isolationist advocated non-involvement in European and Asian wars and non-relation international politics. Also in 1933, Roosevelt announced “The Good Neighbor Policy” which meant that there was no need for armed intervention in other countries, especially in Latin America. While Roosevelt withdrew troops…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy was called aggressive moral diplomacy. According to Wilson himself, he initiated a foreign policy founded on moral principles rather than materialism and economic…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The end of Woodrow Wilson’s first term was met with great approval by the American people for avoiding war in Europe. His first term demonstrated a fair and balanced foreign policy. By the end of his term, Wilson knew in the back of his head, that the United States would not be able to evade war in Europe. Several attempts were made by the United States to make peace with foreign nations who were causing problems. As the turbulence developed in Europe, Wilson began making plans to prepare America for war. Although steps during Woodrow Wilson’s presidency could have been made to maintain neutrality, Wilson was more or less forced into the Great War in 1917 by Germany being oblivious and indifferent towards his warnings.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Stick Abroad Analysis

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To get involved or not to get involved in global politics? That was not a question that Theodre Roosevelt ever had. Global politics were at the forefront of his mission as President. Within a year of Roosevelt becoming President he had interceded with Latin American affairs. I believe this was because Roosevelt felt that the problem threatened his visions for the United States. Roosevelt put the United States in the middle of Germany and Venezuela to help collect a debt that Venezuela owed Germany. He did the same thing to Heidi for Europe. By 1904 Roosevelt had made America the financial protector over the Dominican Republic. Roosevelt was impartial to English speaking Countries. In 1902 Roosevelt…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson’s speech was unprecedented in terms of that it was strongly liberal, and it aimed to join nations through liberal ideology. This is different to how countries, including the USA normally ran as they were more interested in their own achievements rather than the world arena collectively. It is also important to put emphasis on the fact that the USA were the ones hoping for a…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays