Preview

The Controversy Of Gun Control

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1477 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Controversy Of Gun Control
The controversy of guns and gun control has been around for decades, and people have been making laws on this topic since 1791. There are multiple positions you can take on this topic, and most of those positions have sufficient evidence and reasoning for why it's good. With all the laws/restrictions on guns today, it's clear guns must have some effect on our nation. The definition of gun control is "laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms". To summarize, gun control is the laws that let governemnt control the purchase and possesion of firearms. Due to multiple reasons, this idea has spawned much controversy. The first reason some people find it controversial is because they …show more content…
law. This simply isn't true, but many people believe that's what gun control is. The weapons that are targeted by law makers are over-the-top dangerous and weapons that can be easily hidden by most people's standards. The official term for this is "semi-auto assault guns". In addition, magazines with considerably large ammo counts were banned. To understand the banning of these types of firearms, you must first understand the background. This ban on these types of guns start in 1989 when 34 children and a teacher were shot in Stockton using an AK-47 assault rifle. Later in 1993 the "California Street Shooting" also contributed to the ban. The shooter used a TEC-9 to shoot 6 people. The TEC-9 is fairly small and easy to hide, while considerably dangerous at the same time. In 1993, former presidents Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, and Ronald Reagan proposed to the U.S. House of Representatives to support this ban, and as evidence they used a CNN poll. The poll discovered 77% of Americans also supported the ban on these weapons. Considering that big percentage, it's clear most Americans agreed with the ban at the time. Now 'assault weapons' are thrown into three categories: rifles, pistols, shotguns. On top of the requirements from before, if a gun has two or more of these attachments, it is banned. This is to prevent over the top weapons. For rifles to be banned, it must have two or more of …show more content…
Four laws that effected the restrictions and use of firearms was the second amendment, the gun control act of 1968, shotgun/rifle ban in District of Columbia in 1976, and the July 1977 policy in District of Columbia. The second amendment is one of the most important assets to the debate of gun control. As stated before, it is one of the largest causes of controversy and people from both sides of the debate use evidence from it to support their claim. The second amendment states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". The way the message is delivered can be vague and people are unsure what it completely means. For people that are against gun control, the term "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed". They use this to prove that the government has no right to infringe or restrict people's rights to own and utilize guns. On the other hand, people who support gun control also have evidence from this amendment. They can use the line "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state". They can use this line to argue that owning guns was only meant for security and militia purposes only. Another significant law in history revolving around gun control was the "gun control act of 1968" . This law gave

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over the last several years there has been an ongoing debate on how to interpret the Second Amendment and whether or not we should have gun control. With the Second Amendment specifically grants that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The controversy of it being that in the Second Amendment doesn't specify who "the people" are. This being said it leaves room for the legislative bodies and court to pass laws and interpretations that influence the way this Amendment is applied and enforced.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is quite clear that by looking at criminals intentions and the overall protection of our country's people gun control should not be administered. Since the establishment of our great nation guns have played a central role and have been of great importance. Though some may think that guns are weapons of war, crime, and violence our Founding Fathers realized they were an essential right that needed to be preserved for the citizens. In the Bill of Rights the Second Amendment of the Constitution reads "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Gun control proponents have…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A controversial article that I am having an issue with is an article by Thomas Sowell, who is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.2013 Creators Syndicate, Inc. “Do Gun-Control Laws Control Guns?”Sowell, 2013. According to this article the discussions on gun control are dominated by two factors: the National Rifle Association and The Second Amendment. But that the over all concerns is “whether gun-control laws actually reduce gun crimes in general or murder rates in particular”. However, some studies may show no reduction in gun crimes, including murder, under gun-control laws. Sowell, 2013.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role guns play in our society has long been a controversial topic for the past few years in the united states. There are those who believe that guns do not belong in the hands of citizens and there are those who believe that guns are the foundation that protects our rights and liberties stated in the Constitution. There are too many leading factors as to why there should not be any stricter gun control laws. Some of these factors are that they go against our fundamental rights of self defense, give too much power to the government, and could potentially increase crime rates in the united states.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A controversial argument opposite to both viewpoints of gun control mentioned, is the negatives of guns and the need for gun control. In the article, “The Impact of Violence on Children,” Joy Osofsky elaborates that gun violence in communities are extremely detrimental in communities especially on children. Osofsky, a professor of public health in Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, uses masses of children psychology, scenarios and experiences to demonstrate the importance of gun control and to increase gun regulations. She focuses on children’s response to guns and violence, showing that the exposure of gun violence to children at their early ages not only increases their interest to use guns, but also the likelihood to use…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the last couple of years, gun control has continued to be a huge controversial debate in Congress. This argument over whether gun control laws should be strict is nothing new to the world of politics. The ideas of gun control consist of laws that either keep away firearms from people, or allow one to keep guns for personal protection. They also control who the guns are being sold to and who can own them. In America, each state government has passed many gun control laws. Many people think that gun control is right because they think keeping people away from guns will reduce the amount of deaths each year. They also think that guns cause many of the deaths that had been committed each year. Whenever people hear the word gun, the thoughts…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem that splits gun control proponents from their opposition is the language of the second amendment of the constitution. The founding fathers of this nation believed that, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). This multifaceted sentence from the Bill of Rights brings many quarrels to life with its simple diction. It is very open to interpretation, which is what causes both sides of the debate to have “legal stances” on the matter. The National Rifle Association (NRA), which is the nation’s largest gun advocacy organization, is led by the philosophy that it, “[hosts] a wide range of firearms-related public interest activities of the National Rifle Association of America and other organizations that defend and foster the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans.” What gun advocates in the NRA often fail to understand, however, is the conscionable limits to the Second Amendment. As 27-year serving Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia stated in the majority opinion of the District of Columbia V. Heller decision, “like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited” (Scalia). This lead Scalia to also state that, “it is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” These sanctions are legal proof that the second amendment allows for the government to regulate the distribution, ownership, and use of weapons. On top of that, Scalia, regarded as the most conservative justice, clearly highlights that gun control is useful and at times…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Gun Control Debate

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On December 15 1791 the right to bear arms was adopted in the United States Constitution. When the founding fathers were sitting around the table discussing the options for gun laws they were surrounded by a society that required guns to be the right of everyone. England and the separatist Americans were in a violent conflict that resulted in many civilian casualties. Cities were always under threat from aboriginal raids. The continental army was new and untrained. The people could hardly feel safe under their protection. Another thing to remember was slavery still dominated the cultures of many colonies. In the south, slaves often outnumbered the American citizens. What was to stop the slaves from rebelling and killing their cruel owners?…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a big controversy about whether or not to have control over guns. One side of the controversy is that no citizen is allowed to have a gun in the house hold, only allowing the Army, Cops, and anyone with that power over the country. You also have the other side that the citizens are on, where many of the citizens use firearms for hunting, safety, and many other things. How could we take away firearms when so many people have and use them, “In the United States every 100 people 88.8% have firearms.” (ProCon.org “Gun Control ProCon.org”,1) The main reason the government is thinking to have gun control, is to decrease the lives that are getting taken away by these powerful tools that we use to have fun. Many people…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Gun Control Essay

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is gun control? Gun control is when the government puts rules and regulations on where one can bring guns. Governments also limit the amount of guns one owns. Guns are a way to protect our families, stop criminals, and a way to hunt to provide food for families. Some people abuse guns and bring harm to others which is horrible. There should not be a law on gun control. This law restricts those who own them to protect themselves and restricts them from having a firearm. Keeping guns in the United States is the best option for America.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Board, The Editorial. "Congress Says, Let the Mentally Ill Buy Guns." The New York Times. The…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Gun Control Debate

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think the gun control debate can be summed up in three strong questions. Is gun violence truly an epidemic in the US, or is it exaggerated by sensationalist media? I don't think there is an epidemic of gun violence in the US. Is it an issue? Yes, I think so. I also believe the problem is way overblown. Gun crime has been on the decline for the past decade considering stricter laws and technological advances. And violent crime in general. What has gone up is spectacular newsworthy events. When you combine crazy news events and desperate capable you get sensationalist media. Bad things make people visit your site and brings a lot of capital to media stations. Is gun violence simply a feature of the American landscape and we just have to get…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The gun control issue has recently created a massive uproar throughout the U.S. due to some major horrific events such as the Virginia Tech shooting in 2007, where 32 people were killed, the Sandy Hook shooting in 2012 where 27 people were killed, mostly children, and the Columbine shooting in 1999 where 13 people were killed, (CNN) as well as many others. To some, it is a crime issue, to others it’s a right’s issue. It is, obviously, a safety issue, an education issue, a racial issue, and a political issue, among others, and within each of these issues there are those who want more gun control, the Democrats, and those who want less, the Republicans. There are lots of opinions on both sides of the issue ranging from moderate to extreme, and each has good points and arguments. Is there really a “right” party?…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control in America

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although many people feel that gun control violates the second amendment "the right to bear arms", controlling distribution and sales and the registration of these automatic assault rifles is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns and the violence by criminals using guns. There are over two hundred million firearms in the U.S. alone (Gun Control). Opponents of gun control, including the National Rifle Association, better known as the NRA, argue that the "right to bear arms" is guaranteed in the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and licensing restrictions penalize respectable citizens, which they don't try to prevent criminals to use the rifle.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays