The Contribution to Economics of Each of the Following: • Adam Smith • Thomas Malthus • David Ricardo • Karl Marx • Alfred Marshall • John Maynard Keynes • Milton Friedman

Topics: Economics, Adam Smith, Keynesian economics Pages: 6 (2179 words) Published: February 13, 2011
Write an essay describing the contribution to economics of each of the following: •Adam Smith
Thomas Malthus
David Ricardo
Karl Marx
Alfred Marshall
John Maynard Keynes
Milton Friedman

“Many Economists have tried to establish why the economy performs as it does and want to have a basis for predicting how the economy will perform when circumstances change”. (Nagel, S pg 1 1999) Economists are just people after all, who have lived through different times and experiences in their lives, thus leading to different values and views. George Bernard Shaw once said that “If all economists were laid end to end they would not reach a conclusion”,(cited in Mankin, Taylor 2006) In this essay we will look at what contributions each of the above economists have made, keeping in mind the era in which they lived . Reputed to be the father of “The Classical School” of economics, the Scottish born Adam Smith (1772-1790) was a supply side economist. “He attributed economic expansion to expanding production and trade with expanding demand as a by-product and consequence”(Jacobs, J 1985 p12) He promoted the invisible hand of free enterprise, which showed that individuals in pursuing their own selfish interest could benefit society. In other words, if people wish to sell, they must produce what others require at a price that they are prepared to pay. (Palmer. N, 1990). He also advocated the “Laissez-faire” approach, which means that the government should only get involved in the economy in order to raise monies for the upkeep of infrastructure, to sustain the legal system and to defend the country. In Smith’s book ‘An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations’ which was published in 1776, he covered the previous two concepts as well as the division of labour and the function of markets. Division of labour was not a new idea but Smith believed it to be very important as a way of increasing wealth. According to Delaney, Smith established the 4 canons of taxation. “Firstly, the tax levied on each person should be related to the person’s ability to pay. Secondly, the amount of tax which a person must pay should be certain and clear. Thirdly, the manner and timing of payment of taxes should have regard to the convenience of the tax payer. Finally, the cost of collection should be small relative to the yield”. (2008) Another belief of Smiths was the Labour Theory of Value, which means the value of a product is equal to the value of the labour involved in its production. (Delaney.N 2008). Smith believed that there was a distinction between productive and non-productive labour. Teachers, engineers and people with similar professions were considered to be non-productive as they did not produce goods for resale or create funds for reinvestment. Smith also introduced the “value in use” and the “value in exchange” of a product (the paradox of value). Twenty years after Smiths death his writings and theories were embraced by the next generation of writers and economists who established Smith as the founder of economic science. It has been said that before Adam Smith there had been much economic discussion, but with him it reached the stage of discussing economics. (Palmer, N) The classical school of thought was later developed and refined by Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834) and David Ricardo (1772-1823). Both were English born and were followers of Smith’s theories. Malthus is known for his famous “Essay on the Principles of Population as it affects the Future Improvements of Society” published in 1798. At this time in history the Industrial Revolution was taking place which meant more people were moving from rural areas into urban areas. Malthus saw many slums being created with food, water and sewage becoming a huge problem. In his essay, he laid out how the population would grow by a geometric progression, while food supply would only grow by an arithmetic progression. He identified that there should be a check on...

References: Jacobs, Jane Principles of Economic Life Random house ny 1985
Palmer, Noel T Economics 1990 Folens Dublin
Nagle, Sean Economics 2nd Edt. 1999 Colour Books ltd, Dublin 13
De Soto, Hernando The Mystery of Capital, Why Capitalism Triumps in the West and Fails Everywhere Else Black Swan 2001
O’Grady Denis (1993) Leaving Certificate Economics Dublin 24 Folens
Delaney Richard (2008) Understanding Economics leaving Certificate. the Educational Company of Ireland Dublin 12
Gregory Mankin, N and Taylor, Mark P (2006) Thomson Learning-publishers
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Adam Smith and David Ricardo Essay
  • Economis Theorists- Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes and their contributions to the field of economics Essay
  • Karl Marx and Adam Smith Essay
  • The Macroeconomic Perspectives of David Ricardo, Karl Marx, and John Stuart Mill Essay
  • Essay on Critically examine the contributions of Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes and critically examine how they have influenced current...
  • Essay about Adam Smith vs Karl Marx
  • Explain how T.R. Malthus developed and changed Adam Smiths Economics Essay
  • adam smith vs karl marx Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free