Compare and contrast the life, work and social situation of Kano Eitoku and Hasegawa Tohaku.
Kano Eitoku and Hasegawa Tohaku were two painters, who worked during the Azuchi-Momoyama period in Japan. Although Eitoku is far better known as an artist, due to not only his outstanding ability in painting but also because he was a leading figure from his familial Kano School, Tohaku is often considered a rival as his skill and talent was highly comparable to that of Eitoku. Bearing in mind that Eitoku was more fortunate to have a historically famous name with the duty to uphold and grow in reputation, Tohaku began with absolutely nothing in terms of a reputation as an artist, therefore Tohaku’s talent has often been overlooked in history, even though he was a master of his own kind. Thus, it is quite clear that fame does not translate to quality. Although living in the same flamboyant age of extravagance, the Azuchi-Momoyama period, Eitoku and Tohaku lived in very different social situations, as they came from completely different backgrounds and lead separate lives. Taking this into account, it is not surprising that both artists eventually developed their own distinct styles, which are often compared but are vastly dissimilar. Although both artists produced works that were typically ‘Momoyama’ in style with the extensive use of vibrant colours and gold leaf background, their technique, composition and influences differ greatly.
Although the Azuchi-Momoyama Period was very brief, lasting for a mere 33 years, from approximately 1570 to 1603, it is one of the most internationally famous period of Japanese art history and is often referred to as the ‘Japanese Renaissance’, as it was notably more colourful, majestic and extravagant than any other.[i] An interval between the Muromachi and the Edo periods, the Azuchi-Momoyama period laid the foundations of modern Japan as it was during this period that the process of unification of the country began.[ii] In 1582 Oda Nobunaga, one of Japan’s most powerful samurai and daimyo, was assassinated by one of his own men, and consequently the fearless military dictator Toyotomi Hideyoshi took power and by 1590 he had control of one third of Japan.[iii] Hideyoshi was a strong, extravagant exhibitionist who enjoyed flaunting his power through building numerous castles and temples, decorated with dynamic, bold spirited artworks by his most favoured artist Eitoku. Hideyoshi originally came from farmer descent, and served as a foot soldier of Nobunaga but rose by sheer cunning to become his top general. This could be a great underlying reason why he was so hungry for displaying his authority through impressive material possession, such as his expensive colossal castle collection.[iv] The spirit of Zen simplicity began to lose interest, vigour and attraction as it did not achieve reflecting the expressive needs in a period of continuous civil unrest and conquer, and therefore colour and animation began to replace monochrome stillness.[v] Since the majority of the Azuchi-Momoyama period was reigned by Hideyoshi, buoyant, dazzling and rich paintings and Suibokuga monochrome ink paintings merged as it represented the energetic and intensely passionate spirit of the leader Hideyoshi, but also the birth of an utterly new age in Japan.[vi]
During the Azuchi-Momoyama period, there were four major schools of art: The Kano School, which was the official ‘Chinese style’ school, which served the military aristocracy. The Hasegawa School, founded by Hasegawa Tohaku who broke off as an independent artist from the Kano School, in an effort to express his own sensitive style. Also there were two other major rival schools such as the Unkoku School and the Soga School. All of the schools were influenced by Sung and Yuan dynasties of Chinese art. Since, the Kano School, dominated decorative art since the late 15th century in terms of prosperity and ability,[vii] and were the official painters for the shogun...
Bibliography: Moes, R., A Flower for Every Season. Japanese Paintings from the C.D. Carter Collection, Exhibition April 30 - Aug 10. 1975, New York: Brooklyn Museum, division of Publications and Marketing Services.
Tsuda, N., The Decorative Painting in the Momoyama Period. Parnassus, 1934. 6(1): p. 18-21
Deal, W.E., Handbook to Life in Medieval and Early Japan
Yoshikawa, I., Major Themes in Japanese Art. 1976, New York: John Weatherhill Inc.
Stanley-Baker, J., Japanese Art. World of Art Series. 1984, London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.
Noma, S., The Arts of Japan: Late Medieval to Modern. Vol. 2. 1967, Tokyo: Kodansha International Ltd.
Soper, A. and R.T. Paine, The Art and Architecture of Japan. 1958, London: Yale University Press and Pelican History of Art.
Coats, A.B., The Arts of the Momoyama Period in Japan, in The Magazine Antiques. 1996, Academic Research Library: New York.
Momoyama Japanese Art in the Age of Grandeur. An Exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art organized in Collaboration with the Agency for Cultural Affairs of the Japanese Government. 1975, New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Takeda, T., Kano Eitoku. 1974, Tokyo: Kodansha International Ltd and Shibundo
Priest, A., A Note on Japanese Painting. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin New Series, 1953. 11(8): p. 201-240
Clark, J., Some Models in Japanese Art History, in The Burlington Magazine
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Momoyama Period (1573-1615)
O 'Mara, H.J. Hasegawa Tohaku. 2008 [cited 28/05/08]; Available from: http://www.groveart.com.ezproxy2.library.usyd.edu.au/shared/views/help.html?topic=H090.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document