Preview

The Constitutional Debate Era In American History

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
175 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Constitutional Debate Era In American History
During the Constitutional Debate era in American history, the tension between two political parties, the Federalists, led by Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton, and the Anti-Federalists, also known as Democratic-Republicans grew due to opposing opinions on central government, the U.S. economy, and the French Revolution.

One disagreement the Federalists and Antifederalists had was the central government. Hamilton and the feds wanted a strong central government that focused less on individual states. He had already witnessed the consequences of a weak governing system, especially in terms of taxing and policies relating to money. Hamilton got a group of nationalists together at the 1786 Annapolis Convention, where representatives of several
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Federalists Vs Anti Federalists
    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalists Vs Anti Federalists

    The Federalists and the Anti Federalists went together like fire and ice. They always seemed to crash heads when it came to who should take power. The supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves Federalists. They wanted a strong centered government. Unlike the Anti federalists, they were a diverse coalition of people who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Although less well organized than the Federalists, they also had an impressive group of leaders who were especially prominent in state politics. There are a multiple of ways that these 2 political parties can be compared such as the articles of confederation, their supporters, and the bill of rights.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Differences Between Democratic-Republicans And Federalists
    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Differences Between Democratic-Republicans And Federalists

    The two main political parties in early America, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans between the years 1789 and 1812. Some of the topics are boring and some of the topics are pretty interesting.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Democrats And The Federalists
    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Democrats And The Federalists

    The Federalist party was an American political party from 1792 to 1816. The Democratic-Republican party was founded in 1792 by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans viewed society differently. Being they viewed society in a way to help people individually or help them as a whole. Both political groups viewed many key issues differently that played a role in 1792 to 1816. The Democratic-Republicans and Federalist were facing economic issues, government power and foreign affairs. However, the Democratic-Republicans’ idea was more agreeable than the Federalists being they believed in a more prosperous republic by helping those in need than helping one group of people. People living during those times did not like the living…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitution
    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Constitution

    The 1790's became known as the Federalist Era because a Federalist President led it. Political parties began to form around two leaders, Hamilton and Jefferson. The Federalist Party supported Hamilton and his financial program. The opposing party that was known as the Democratic-Republican Party supported Jefferson and tried to elect candidates in different states who opposed Hamilton's program. The French Revolution later hardened the formation of these two parties. Americans became sharply divided over whether it should or should not support France.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton Vs. Thomas Jefferson
    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton Vs. Thomas Jefferson

    During the Revolutionary- Federalist Era, politics, parties, programs, policies, and people made an enormous difference in how the new nation should be structured and run. During this era, two men in particular championed politics and their respective parties. These two men were Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were successful college educated intellectuals and politicians who made significant contributions to the development of the United States policies and programs. However Hamilton, despite never being elected President, had more influence over the development of the United States’ policies and programs during the Revolutionary-Federalist Era. Historically Hamilton and Jefferson are known for agreeing to disagree over just about every policy being discussed during the establishment of government structure, and decorum. And it is Hamilton’s policies on economics, government structure, and constitution interpretation, which took precedent over Jefferson’s.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Broad constructionism vs strict constructionism
    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Broad constructionism vs strict constructionism

    Through the development and drafting of the constitution, two political parties were born. One labeled as strict constructionists, the Jeffersonian Republicans, and the other labeled as broad constructionists, the Federalists. The Democratic-Republicans such as Thomas Jefferson, were first labeled as anti-federalists and believed the states should have the most power in the government and most vowed not to sign the constitution without the addition of a Bill of Rights. They believed that if a power was not specifically stated in the constitution, then it could not be acted upon. The Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton, believed that they could exercise whichever powers on the basis that, even if a power was not physically stated, it could be interpreted from the specified powers. During the presidencies of Washington and Adams these characterizations of the two parties remained evident, but during the presidencies of Republicans, such as Jefferson and Madison, the line between strict and broad constructionism became a little more unclear. After the election of 1800 both the Federalist and Democratic-Republican party began to back down on their views of constructionism when faced with the task of deciding what would benefit the nation most.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton Vs Thomas Jefferson Analysis
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hamilton Vs Thomas Jefferson Analysis

    The founding father generation of 1789 established a new government under the constitution. Interpreting the constitution soon became the debate in the world of politics. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson both had distinguished point of views during George Washington’s presidency. As a result, a the two party system emerged, consisting of the Federalists, Hamilton, and the Democratic-Republicans, Jefferson and James Madison. However, to some extent, president Jefferson and Madison expressed Hamilton’s view of government and the constitution during their reign as president.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson vs. Alexander Hamilton
    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Jefferson vs. Alexander Hamilton

    The conflict that took place in the 1790’s between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists made a huge impact on American History. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and focused mainly on the city businesses as well as manufacturing interests of the seaports. On the other side, the Anti-Federalists whom were led by Thomas Jefferson represented the rural farmers and southern interests. With the Federalists favoring more federal involvement and the anti-federalists advocating states rights, this debate between the two concerned the central government versus that of the states.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Rise and Fall of the Federalist Party
    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Rise and Fall of the Federalist Party

    Warns against the party system. “It serves to distract the Public Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration… agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one… against another… it opens the door to foreign influence and corruption… thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.” Washington saw a potentially harmful political factionalism in the country. He insisted Americans to unite for the good of the country. Two political parties had developed in the early 1790s, the Federalist and the Republicans (later known as Democratic-Republicans). The Federalists, and Washington himself, backed up Hamilton’s plan for a central bank and other strong central economic plans based on manufacturing. The Republicans went against the Hamilton’s plan and favored farmers as opposed to city people. Washington predicted that this political division would play significantly in the new government, as these two developing parties attempted to guide the nation and shape it to match with their thought. In today’s society, we have two different parties: Democrats and Republicans. Democrats are more liberal. They believe in a…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    This essay is on Strict vs. Loose construction during the presidencies of Madison and Jefferson
    • 1158 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This essay is on Strict vs. Loose construction during the presidencies of Madison and Jefferson

    In the early days of the United States of America when the country was beginning to grow under the newly ratified Constitution, there were two main political parties in existence, the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. From the time period of 1801-1817, the two presidents that were elected to rule the U.S. were Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Both Jefferson and Madison were Jeffersonian Republicans who were characterized as strict-constructionists in respect to the federal constitution before they each took the office of the presidency, but when they took office the public found out that Jefferson and Madison's previous characterizations had not been very accurate when, as president, they began to act like the opposite of what they originally believed in.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Led to the Rise of Political Parties in the 1790's
    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Led to the Rise of Political Parties in the 1790's

    The more Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson disagreed the further they grew apart causing the people of the country to have to choose sides as the factions began to…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    1977 Dbq
    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1977 Dbq

    This decade was a time of international crisis and discord. The Federalists opposed the Democratic Republicans’ attachment to France. Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalists, thought that Britain was superior and believed that the U.S. should model our government after theirs (Document D). Jefferson argued that Britain wasn’t democratic enough and we would lose our republican policies if we used their form of government (Document E).…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamilton vs. Jefferson
    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hamilton vs. Jefferson

    During the years after the Revolutionary War, the founding fathers introduced a very weak form of government through the Articles of Confederation. These articles were created to give more power to the states than the federal government. Eventually, the Constitutional Convention was called to edit the Articles of Confederation, but the members of this convention completely gutted the documents. This led to the development of a very important document of United States history. Thus, the Constitution was born. This new document sparked mass controversy amongst the states and led to a huge debacle. The federalist states supported the Constitution; whereas, the anti-federalists did not approve of the ratification of the Constitution. Soon after the 9 to 13 ratification of the Constitution, the leaders of the federalists and anti-federalists emerged. The federalists were headed by Alexander Hamilton, the county’s treasurer; and, the anti-federalists were led by Thomas Jefferson. Due to their contrasting backgrounds, stern differences in political ideals, and different economic priorities, Hamilton and Jefferson quickly formed a huge two-partied rivalry in the United States that eventually led to a gigantic schism in American politics.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Loose Constructionists Dbq Analysis
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Loose Constructionists Dbq Analysis

    Conflict over foreign and domestic policies between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson led to the development of two political parties. Although the Jeffersonian-Democratic were strict constructionist and the Federalists were loose constructionists, both failed to be consistent and chose whichever interpretation that better served their interests at the time.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Jefferson And Demm Rep Parties And Federalists Justify Their Ideals
    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Jefferson And Demm Rep Parties And Federalists Justify Their Ideals

    Starting in the years 1801-1817 there was a separation in the United States. The Federalists and Dem-Rep parties were basically opposites of each other. The Republicans were usually seen as strict constructionists, who opposed the broad constructionism of both Jefferson and Madison who were Federalists. In both, Jefferson’s and Madison’s presidencies they highlighted Federalists ideals in their decisions, including Jefferson’s purchase of the Louisiana territory.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics