The Constitutional Convention Analysis

The Constitutional Convention portrayed different effects of each policy. Throughout the process various negotiation were made to accommodate different groups need. It seemed less complicated to draft a Constitutional structure to further promote our political agenda. However, satisfying everyone with all our policies was not an easy task. Although, the Constitution did accommodate every once need including minorities, aside from the Islamic funambulists. We Lala’s wanted to have a federal structure as a group since. We would like to divide the power between the national government and local governments as a fair federal government will do. Also, Lalas wants parliamentary systems, since it features a combination of powers in which
To successfully convince everyone at the convention with our policies, we were being used our knowledge from this course efficiently. All my peers, who took part in the debate, had an understanding with the theories we were arguing about. For example, the structure of the government and how well it works in our society, electoral system in a state and finally human rights involved throughout the debate as well. During the course of the convention, the uncertainty about knowing the correcting policy structure was foreseen as well. This convention was difficult due to how diverse it was. It was consisting of 30% Lalas, 30% Kartouks, 20% Jabar, 20% Suuz Party along with Islamic fundamentalists. Each group had its own agenda, that is was crucial to understanding everyone needs throughout the convention. In that process, our ideas were challenged and we negotiated to come to a gray area. The furthermost debated proposals were the type of government and the economic system country X should have. Throughout the process, we ensured to make sure the policies which were being implemented were benefitting towards us and also other minority