Preview

The Constitution Party Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
219 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Constitution Party Essay
History of The Constitution Party
The Constitution Party is a right wing nationalist political party that beleives that the United States is a Chrisitan Nation founded on the basis of the Bible. The party was founded as the "US Taxpayers' Party" by Howard Phillips, who believed his party was drifting too far to the left side of the political spectrum. The party's name was changed to the Consituion Party in 1999. The party's platform is based on the party's understanding of the original intent of the nation's founding documents.
This party supports limited federal government as outllined in the US Constitution, with all the powers retained by the peopleof the statesas provided by the tenth amendment. Although the Tea Party and Constitutional Party have many things in common, the Constitutional Party is a legally registered party. The Constituion Party was named this to better reflect the party’s primary focus of re-establishing the American Constitutional Republic according to the actual intent of the writers of the U.S. Constitution.The Constitution Party is committed to restoring the government to its constitutional limited authority.
The party absorbed the American Independent Party, which was founded for George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign.The Constitution Party candidate, former congressman Tom Tancredo, came in second place in the 2010 Colorado gubernatorial election, ahead of Republican Dan Maes.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time the Constitution was written there were two different parties that wanted different things from the United States government. The Revolutionaries or “Radicals”, led by men such as Thomas Jefferson, Sam Adams and Patrick Henry, emphasized the strength and efficiency in government. These were the men who wanted Liberty and the Bill of Rights. The other famous group was the Federalists, which consisted of Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. These leaders were more concerned with popular aspects of society such as power, control, and the protection of property rights. In order to keep maintain their wealth, they supported a strong central government, much like the current British system. Both parties contained some of the boldest and most radical thinkers of their time, helping make the Constitution last over 200…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the beginning of the country's political growth, the United States was divided into two basic political parties known as the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. While Jefferson and Madison's presidencies were opposed by the Federalists, some of their contributions supported the Federalist Party's beliefs.. While Jefferson and Madison's decisions in office were mainly based of off a strict construction of the constitution, some decisions came from a loose construction. These loose construction decisions can be seen in the Louisiana Purchase and Jefferson and Madison's support of the national bank.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With respect to the federal Constitution, the Democratic-Republicans were usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. As history dictates, this is substantially accurate. In the time frame of 1801-1817, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the Republican presidents of the time, demonstrated the differences of the Republican Party in several aspects involving the interpretation of the Constitution. The Democratic-Republicans believed that the government should follow a strict interpretation of the Constitution and held the idea that this would allow honest representation of the people and prevent government corruption. However, the Federalists were firm believers in the production of a strong central government and a broad interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist Party was led by Alexander Hamilton. Federalists favored a strong federal government, believed that the government should be ruled by educated, wealthy men, wanted to pay off national debt, establishing a national credit, promoted entrepreneurship & manufacturing, and interpreted the United States Constitution with an open mind. These views supported the Federalists’ view on the French Revolution and so did Jefferson’s party.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Dbq Essay

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The birth of a nation was sparked solely from the tyrany Great Britain showed towards the colonies in the years leading up to our nation declaring it's independence. Ten years later our Founding Fathers saw us heading in the same direction. A sense of that same tyrany could eventually be found in the formerly written Articles of Confederation; which was specifically created to erase the tyrany our nation's citizens had loathed for so long. To say that the Founding Fathers scrapped the Articles of Confederation solely for personal gain is leaving out so many variables. If I were a delegate to the Convention, and upon arriving I heard the reasoning for writing a new Constitution, yes I would've stayed. To truly answer this, one must objectively…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The current process of selecting nominees is one that is flawed for a number of reasons, with lack of consistency being the main reason for the flaws. While the Democratic Party assigns its delegates proportionally, the Republican Party has its assignment of delegates vary by state, whether it’s winner-take-all, proportional, or a hybrid system, and the percentage of the popular vote in the state needed to win the delegates also varies by state. This lack of consistency usually leads campaigning efforts by a candidate to be centered around some states more than others, and possibly ignoring states completely. If states feel left out by a candidate who doesn’t feel a state is necessary for winning the nominee, supporters of that candidate in…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson represented different interests that would come to define the priorities of the nation's 1st political parties (Thomas 10). These two-party political systems were impacted by domestic and foreign affairs. Hamilton and Jefferson had different interests that would define the priorities of the nation's first political parties. The Federalists and Antifederalists division took place during the debates over ratification of the constitution (Sisung 2). The Federalists were more centralized, and they could keep their name as the Federalists because they were much more modest. They were known as those who only looked up to the government and followed all their rules. The Anti-Federalists were decentralized and had a variety of names, Democratic Republicans, Republican, but were mostly called Jeffersonian Republicans. They believed in freedom and opposed the Constitution and federal government which was the total opposite of what the Federalists believe in.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists believe in a strong federal system of governance, promotion of nationalistic government meanwhile the democratic- Republican believe in the promotion of the principles of republicanism over elitism. They both have different input of their philosophies too, the Democratic- Republicans believe and follow the Jeffersonian Democracy and Republicanism, while Federalist party follows Federalism, on the idea of industrialization and nationalism. Both parties also believed in liberty and freedom of the people. They opposed on every known issue. The Federalist Party believed in a strong central government while the Republican Party believed in the rights of the states. They reasoned saying that the liberty could only be protected if the power rested in the hands of the people. The Republicans had the view that the state could exercise powers only enumerated in the constitution. Federalists on other hand considered a loose reading of the constitution. They argued that state had the right to make laws necessary for the functioning of the government which were not forbidden by the…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of the fiscal policy, the Constitution Party advocates for lesser responsibility for the government by way of limiting bureaucratic control, limiting spending and the implementation of tariffs to obtain revenues instead of income tax. The party wants to eliminate the various types of government taxes and the members do not believe that the money being allocated to support the basic services for the people is legal under the law. The party advocates that the debt of America have to be paid through an organized process of borrowing and elimination of agencies that are unnecessary (Djupe, 2003). They do not believe that it is essential for America to engage in foreign aid and that there is no need for America to get involved with lending organizations. The party also believes that the implementation of government income and estate taxes violates the Constitution.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the beginning of the formation of a republic in the United States, many people feared the creation of factious voting blocks which would impose the will of a vocal minority on the majority of the people. Despite steps to avoid this, two political parties did form after George Washington stated that he would not seek another term and it became unclear who would be the next president. These parties were the Federalist Party, led by Alexander Hamilton, and the Democratic Republican Party, led by Thomas Jefferson. The Federalists were conservative and as a result their beliefs centered on a strong central government. The Democratic Republicans were liberal and supported the rights of states and individuals. The two political parties which formed after Washington's presidency, the Federalist Party and the Democratic Republican Party, expressed the polarized extremes of the young nation’s beliefs in terms of socioeconomic and political issues.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Have you ever wondered what the different political were like when our country was founded? The two parties were not nearly the same as our Republican and Democratic parties today. The two parties back then were the Federalists and the Republicans.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I was the oldest delegate in the Philadelphia Convention. Other than George Washington I was the best man in America. I was born into a poor family and became an inventor, scientist, diplomat and publisher. My career in public service was long, I serviced as an ambassador to England and France and I was also a Governor of Pennsylvania. I was a compromiser, I brought delegates together. I favored the strong national government that the United States had, I was a firm believer that the framers should trust the judgment of the people. Although I didn’t agree with everything in the constitution, I believe that no other convention would come up with a better document.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the U.S. government was frail under the Articles of Confederation there was a debate on whether to ratify the U.S. Constitution. Those who supported the ratification were the Federalists, and those who opposed were known as the Anti- Federalists. Federalists believed in the idea of a strong central government while on the other hand Anti- federalists wanted their own states to have the right to set their own laws.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, the ratification of federalist papers. Once the document was presented to the states for ratification, Madison, along with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, published a series of newspaper essays that became known collectively as the Federalist Papers. Writing under the pseudonym "Publius", Madison authored twenty- nine of the eighty- five essays. He argued the case for a strong central government subject to an extensive system of checks and balances where in "ambition" would be counteracted by competing ambition. The collection of documents are classic statements on republican government and stand as a significant early interpretation of the meaning and intent of U.S. According to James Madison's quote, he said If men were angels,…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays