top-rated free essay

The Concept of Power in Politics

Oct 08, 1999 769 Words
The Meaning of Power

The instrumental character of power is that of a "means to an end." It includes the tools, resources, and abilities used to pursue goals. The meaning of power and its role in politics is understood first with a background of its dual nature.

De jure refers to the theory of power. The concept of "absolute power," considers tangible factors. When comparing nations' power, money and gross national product are units of measure; the United States is more powerful than Mexico. Army size and strength are also measurable. World powers, such as the U.S., Britain, and Japan, defeat countries with smaller, weaker armies. From an objective standpoint, tangible assets make a country a world power. But world powers and their leaders also possess intangible qualities.

De facto is the subjective aspect of power that is immeasurable. Charisma, such as that of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King, could not be described, but made them successful leaders. The "will to win" or morale of people, especially athletes, is power. De facto power is continually changing because of the relative character of power, to time, situation, and contending parties. When power is applied in interaction with contending parties, the situational factors of power and politics come into play.

Power is initially proven in a political situation through credibility. The opposing party's belief that you have power and will use it makes them take you seriously. It makes them respond to you, and the interest you are pursuing. For example, the United States wants more oil production from the OPEC nations. The U.S. has power, as mentioned before, and credibility based on its world power status. OPEC's response will be based on this credibility along with the U.S.'s capability.

What the United States has and can do reestablishes the country's de jure power. OPEC's oil-producing countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Iraq, know the U.S. has a strong army. But they do not know the U.S.'s plan for using this power. The U.S. could decide to use the army, as a form of physical power if the request is denied. Or, the country could use economic power, in the form of trade restrictions. The percentage of power the U.S. utilizes depends on intention.

The importance of the country's goals determines the United States' intention to obtain more oil. Is this a strong intention, requiring one-hundred percent effort and power? Oil is vital to the U.S., in its industries and to its people, for their economic and personal needs. The more necessary oil is for the U.S. to achieve its goals in these areas, the more power will be utilized to get the oil. The contending party, the OPEC nations, is the outside factor in this political situation. The ways in which the United States pursues this issue may include up to eight manifestations of power.

It is best to use the less extreme measure of bargaining first. The United States may trade or provide aid to foreign countries to get the oil. Authority, the U.S.'s power of position, or prestige, the power of ideology to motivate, may manifest. These are more psychological forms of power.

Intelligence, having knowledge of the opponent's intention, and influence, bringing information to bear, are more applicable to individual political situations than world politics. However, if the United States knew OPEC intended to restrict oil, the country could form an alliance with other countries to get more oil production from OPEC.

More extreme manifestations of power, such as manipulation, coercion, and pure force, are unlikely to occur in this situation because their application contributes more to political failure than success. In the past, Americans have rejected leaders who have engaged in war. Civilian behavior during the Vietnam War is a prime example of public dissatisfaction with government activities. Though more oil should benefit the American people, a war over oil will most likely be viewed negatively. Leaders concerned with political success will avoid war and other extreme manifestations of power in favor of more moderate actions.

This oil example is just one state of affairs with possibilities for success and failure. In pursuing oil for economic success and wealth, the United States government must retain the respect of the public. This example represents legitimacy in politics, which states that values must be compatible. I believe this is the most important principle for American leaders to keep in mind in deciding the forms of power they use and the manifestations their power takes on.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • The Concept of Power in International Politics

    ... Distinction of Mind from Body Using the arguments from doubt, from clear and distinct perceptions, and from simplicity, Descartes attempts to prove in “The Meditations” that the mind is distinct and separate from the body. This view is now known as Cartesian Dualism. In this essay I will outline Descartes’ mai...

    Read More
  • Power in Politics

    ...also saw them call the demands made by the sailor in the petrovlapk resolution as absurd. The Bolsheviks had betrayed the very principles they promised to uphold in the October slogans. The communist principle had been betrayed quite evidently, the new regime was worried more about staying in power then respecting the wishes of the people and to...

    Read More
  • Power and Politics

    ...Introduction Have you ever wondered what role politics and power play in organizations? When used effectively they can be compatible in reaching the organizations goals. Power is defined as the ability to get someone to do something you want done or the ability to make things happen in the way you want them. (Schermerhorn, Hunt, and Osbo...

    Read More
  • Power and Politics

    ...Power and Politics Power and Politics Webster’s defines politics as follows: “political affairs or business; especially: competition between competing interest groups or individuals for power and leadership (as in a government), political activities characterized by artful and often dishonest practices; relations or conduct in a partic...

    Read More
  • Power and Politics

    ...Politics and Power: Examples from Today's Corporate World An effective organization focuses on strong leadership, power and political issues. These components are critical to creating an organization mindful of values, ethics, culture and innovation. Analyzing the use of power and politics are essential to understanding the behavior of indivi...

    Read More
  • Power and Politics

    ...� �PAGE �6� Power and Politics Power and politics are often considered to be integral components in the development of the organization. Where does power end and politics begin? Many individuals think that politics and power are tied together because you can not have one without the other. On the other hand politics and power are separ...

    Read More
  • Power Politics

    ...Power Politics Introduction: Power is a discursive phenomenon existing significantly from the psyche of an individual to the structure of the whole universe. In between these the power has an influential authority in the discussion of politics. In relation to the politics the word power is explained as “the ability of one person to ca...

    Read More
  • Power and Politics

    ...Power and Politics Introduction Power is important within organizations because power is the way in which management influences individuals to make things happen. When power and influence combine most of the time, "politics" becomes involved in some manner which may pose some problems. Organizational politics is best described as management ...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.