Preview

The Compromise Of 1850: The Power Of The States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
436 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Compromise Of 1850: The Power Of The States
States' Rights": The rights and powers belonging to individual US states instead of the federal government. Since the Constitution was first written, arguments had taken place regarding just how much power the states should have vs. how much power the federal government should control. Originally, the Article of the Federation established a weak government an issue that was addressed with the US Constitution that would strengthen the federal power. However, both northern and southern states disagreed with some federal laws when it came to the explosive Furtive Slave Act of 1850. Stating runaway slave were to be returned to their masters, even if captured in free states. With this the northern states felt the federal government was robbing them to regulate slavery in their own district. Consequently, with tensions building on both sides John C. …show more content…
The Compromise of 1850 was drafted by Henry Clay whose idea was from a Senator from Illinois by the name Stephen A. Douglas. The Compromise was passed by the US Congress on September 1850, mostly to pacify the issue of slavery and territorial boundaries between the North and South. Issues around slavery increased between the North and South. Consequently, ten years after the Compromise of 1850, the American Civil War began.

Dred Scott case: Dred Scott was an enslaved African American man in the United States who sued for the freedom of himself his wife and their two daughters. Mr. Scott unsuccessfully won the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford of 1857, which was otherwise known as the "Dred Scott Decision." The Dred Scott case was regarded as one of the worst supreme court decisions of all times. It stated that nor free or enslave African Americans could be American

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Facts: This lawsuit involves Dred Scott, an African American slave and his owner due to the passing of his previous owner Dr. Emerson, John F. A. Sanford. John F.A Sanford is the brother to the wife of Dr. Emerson. Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Missouri Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis on April 6, 1846 . Dred Scott’s legal suit is for assault and false imprisonment: “A slave could be punished and kept as property, but a free person could not.”…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War inevitable

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout many compromises, and conflicts one of the large decisions was the Dred Scott decision. Dred Scott, who had lived in Illinois for 5 years with his master, sued his master for his freedom because Illinois was a free state. The decision concluded by the court ruled that because the slave was a property the master could take them in any area. With this decision it delighted the Southerners', while it made the Northerners' angry.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1820 Missouri Compromise played a large role in the campaign against slavery. In 1819 Missouri became a statehood and congress considered framing a state constitution, with this a representative attempted to add a anti-slavery legislation with it. This is what started the process of the campaign against slavery. Henry Clay made a large contribution toward this compromise in 1820, with his new ideas on how to settle the conflict between the North and the South, which lasted until 1954.All the compromise's made from 1820's to the Kansas Nebraska compromise in 1854, were all factors which led to the civil war.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dred Scott was a slave who moved in with his master to the free state of Illinois. He claimed that residence in a free state made him a free man, and he fought for his freedom all the way to the Supreme Court (1865). Chief Justice Taney ruled that since blacks could not be citizens, they had no right to sue in a federal court. The court also went further and said the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Dbq

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page

    The compromise of 1850 was a document constructed by Henry Clay to ease tensions between North and South. The compromise consisted of the following five points—(1) writing a new fugitive slave law, since beforehand white citizens could give runaway slaves room and board and not be penalized, therefore appeasing the South, (2) annexing California as a free state to the Union, an advantage to the North, (3) prohibiting the slave trade, but not slavery itself, in the District of Columbia, (4) reorganizing the Mexican Cession into the New Mexico and Utah territories with the slavery issue being decided by popular sovereignty, and (5) declaring a border between Texas and New Mexico, with $10 million in reparations for the territory Texas surrendered…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scott vs. Sandford case was an extremely historical event in the United States because this was the first time a slave tried to sue his owner for his freedom. Like every other court case in the U.S. there was the Defendant, the Plaintiff, and the Judge. The issue was brought to court by the plaintiff, Dred Scott, a slave with a wife and two daughters, who argued that his service for his first owner, Dr. Emerson, in Illinois, a state from which slavery has been excluded by the Missouri Compromise, made him a free man with full rights as any other American citizen. But Dred didn’t stay in Illinois, he returned with his owner, Dr. Emerson, to Missouri where Plaintiff was sold to Sandford, the defendant in this case. Dred sued Sandford for his freedom, claiming to be a citizen of the United States.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was a African American slave born in Virginia in the year 1800. In the 1830s Scott and Harriet Robinson lived in Fort Snelling in the 1830s working as free people as slavery was outlawed in the area. He lived there with an army surgeon named Emerson and was paid an independent salary. When Emerson was reassigned to the south they Scotts moved to fort Jesup in Louisiana. But soon returned to Fort snelling. In 1846 the Scotts decided to sue for their freedom because they were denied the optioned to buy it by Emerson's widow. In 1853 they filed in federal court. After Dred was freed in St. Louis circuit court in 1857, the supreme court made a decision based on the Dred Scott case stating that African Americans were not citizens and…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Born a slave to the Peter Blow family in 1799 Virginia, Dred Scott makes an action that is now considered a pivotal moment in early American history and the worst Supreme Court decision in American history, as he plans to sue his slave owner for his freedom.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emerson’s widow. The next year the Missouri Supreme Court Decide to retried the case. In an 1850 retrial the St. Louis court ruled that Scott and his family were free.” Two years later the Missouri Supreme Court stepped in again, reversing their decision.Scott and his lawyer the brought the case to to federal court. “In 1854, the circuit court upheld the decision of the Missouri Supreme Court.” “After losing again in the federal district court, they went to the Supreme court in Dred Scott v.s Sandford.”(Wikipedia) Dred Scott had an argument that since he was in Illinois on free soil he should become a free citizen.” (Wikipedia) Scott claimed that him and John Sanford, who lived in New York, were citizens from different states. “The justices of the Supreme Court were biased regarding slavery. Seven of them had been appointed by pro slavery presidents, and five were families the owned slaves.”…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First thing first, what is the compromise of 1850? The compromise of1850 was a set of five bills that eventually lead to the civil war. Its purpose was to keep away confrontation between the northern free slave states and the southern slave states and keep the nation united. The first bill consist of California being admitted to the union as a free state. The second bill allowed New Mexico and Utah settlers to vote on an issue. The third bill relied on Texas loosing New Mexico territory, but $10 million was received from the government for the loss. The slave trade in the district of Colombia was abolished which created the fourth bill. Last but not least the fifth bill passed a new Fugitive slave act.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was a true compromise. Both sides of the debate were perfectly unhappy, or “halfway happy” as it has been phrased. Instead of being content that they got something they wanted, both ended up resenting the other more for what they got, and for not seeing it their way. The compromise did nothing to improve relations or communication between the two sides. It entrenched both, and shut down debate as everyone involved was increasingly defending and justifying their beliefs.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southerners were disparagingly serious about addressing the Fugitive Slave Law. On May 3rd, 1851 Ralph Waldo Emerson a popular writer and an influential one at that saw this rising issue as a chance to speak out against Southern perspective. “He who writes a crime into the statute book digs under the foundations of the Capital to plant there a powder magazine and lays a train”(Document D). A pattern of wrongdoing was established as a result of slavery supporting states in the lower regions that were supposed to be UNITED. The constitution was written, unsurprisingly, to not include slavery so the foundation of the capital was in completely grave danger. Enacted by Congress initially in 1793, the Fugitive slave law allowed local governments to capture slaves and bring them to their owners since they were property no matter where they were. It was then taken into harsher measures in 1850. The law was persisted, conditions were difficult, penalties increased, unfortunately leading to War. Many slaves took that harsh journey for freedom; Vermont and Wisconsin were states that assisted the runaways. Government regulation became seemingly built for the benefit of southern…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott decision of 1857 is one of the most famous Supreme Court decisions because it declared that slaves could never become citizens of the United States. The Court’s 6-3 decision stated that the Constitution could not protect blacks and “blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” Since slaves could never become citizens they had no right to sue and Dred Scott remained a slave. The courts reputation following this decision plummeted to an all time low in the North and now Republicans of the time viewed the court as controlled by the Slave Power.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 is one of the most important compromises in this history of the United States, maybe even the world. The Compromise of 1850 is made up of five bills passed in the United States of America in September 1850, and it terminated a four-year confrontation between the slave states of the south and the free states of the north concerning the position of territories gained during the time of the Mexican-American war which was in 1846-1848. The most important political ramification in the Compromise has to be the Fugitive Slave Act for numerous reasons. Many historians have argued that the Fugitive Slave Act was very obliging to the abolitionist cause, even though…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays