Preview

The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
951 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
Why India Will Not Sign The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
Now, Read the Update!
As the Geneva talks on drafting a treaty to ban nuclear explosions draw to a close, India is finding itself isolated in its stand that an effective CTBT must be an instrument for global nuclear disarmament.

Politics have occupied everyone in India for the past three months or so, but now that the country finally has a government in place-one that is expected to last more than the 13 days the previous one did-it will be time to take some hard decisions. And the first and perhaps the toughest one will be India's stand on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).

As the Geneva talks on drafting a treaty to ban nuclear explosions draws towards a conclusion, India is finding itself isolated in its stand that an effective CTBT must be an instrument for global nuclear disarmament. India is arguing that the present approach of the nuclear powers will create a nuclear apartheid between the haves and have nots and this is unacceptable to Indian security concerns.

With a declared nuclear power - China - on one side and Pakistan which is suspected to have the capability on the other, India has to keep its options open. This has been the consistent stand of all governments in the past few years and the present coalition government in the country too has clearly said that it will follow that route. Indeed, on the questions of nuclear weapons there is a national consensus which transcends political differences-India wants nuclear power for peaceful purposes but will not forego the nuclear option as its security perceptions are based on the nature and direction of threats. India and China have fought one war and India and Pakistan three; temperatures are always high on the Indo-Pak front and of late even diplomatic relations have plummeted to a new low. China, which tested a nuclear device two weeks ago has an estimated 300 warheads; Pakistan has always broadly hinted it has the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Lettow, Paul Vorbeck. 2010 Strengthening the nuclear nonproliferation regime. New York Council on forgein Relations. Print…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Khanna, V. N., 1996. International Relations. 4th edition. New Dehli: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.…

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    both nuclear and extended, because of cultural bias and ignorance; 2) to assure that Indian…

    • 2938 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are numerous documented cases of safety mechanisms failing on nuclear weapons, very nearly causing nuclear launches. New proliferating states often have crude security measures and are not as advanced as established nuclear powers, increasing the chance of an accident. Moreover, some nuclear programs are also secretive, decreasing the transparency and ability for groups to scrutinize and criticize the process. Instead of risking a potentially catastrophic accident, nuclear weapons should simply be…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of nuclear weapons for better or worse have indubitably impacted our lives in one way or the other. There are the some who find these weapons to be singularly beneficial. For example Defence Analyst Edward Luttwak said “we have lived since 1945 without another world war precisely because rational minds…extracted a durable peace from the very terror of nuclear weapons.” (Luttwak, 1983). Moreover, Robert Art and Kenneth Waltz both extrapolate that “the probability of war between American and Russia or between NATO and the Warsaw Pact is practically nil precisely because the military planning and deployments of each, together with the fear of escalation to general nuclear war, keep it that way.” (Art, Waltz, 1983) Yet there are many who also share the view of Jonathan Schell who dramatically infers that if we, society, do not “rise up and cleanse the earth of nuclear weapons, we will “sink into the final coma and end it all.” (Schell, 1982) The central purpose of this essay is to challenge the conventional wisdom about nuclear proliferation; that nuclear weapons do indeed induce a greater stability amongst international politics however this does not justify countries to continue nuclear arms proliferation with seemingly no endless bounds. However despite this it is naïve to declare that a world without nuclear weapons would be without peace either. Nuclear weapons are more than just symbols of destruction and chaos but however hold far more important roles in international politics. They are at the forefront of national security and hold considerable importance in domestic debates and internal bureaucratic struggles and serve as international normative symbols of modernity and identity and as such have to be treated with utmost care and with a sense of supreme responsibility by countries that hold them.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [1] Howlett, Darryl ‘Nuclear Proliferation’ in John Baylis and Steve Smith, The Globalisation of World Politics (Oxford: OUP, 2001, second edition)…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Deal

    • 4684 Words
    • 19 Pages

    e The conclusion of the Indo-U.S. civil-nuclear deal in the fall of 2008 marked the end of three years of negotiations between the U.S. and India. Completion of the deal should not, however, obscure the history of domestic debate within the U.S. and India on how the terms of the deal apply. One issue on which lack of consensus notably persists within the U.S. is how the deal would be affected by India…

    • 4684 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For the past thirty years, Iran and North Korea have been trying to develop and design a nuclear warhead, nowadays; American spies say that Iran has built a Uranium enrichment plant on Qum. Uranium enrichment is the hardest step in order to produce nuclear weapon, and North Korea has already tested nuclear weapons the past years. This is a way to prove that nuclear proliferation keeps increasing in the world and this could balance the world power in a negative way. If states that are directly against each other keep increasing their nuclear arsenal, the world could be ruled or at least influenced by an unstable military power determined by actions made with nuclear weapons. By now, only the strongest military and economic nations possess nuclear warheads and these countries maintain good political and democratic relations between each others except India and Pakistan. The fact that only this nations own nuclear weapons keep the world safe because they know that they will not use those weapons, however many nations such us Iran North Korea and Libya have been trying to obtain one for the past years. No matter what the U.N does, proliferation keeps increasing and new nations try to obtain nuclear warheads, in addition, the more nuclear bombs are in the world the easiest is to trade them among terrorist, in the past years several terrorist groups have been involved in trading nuclear arms in the black market. This is why if Nations Like Iran, North Korea And Libya continue to try to produce nuclear energy to use it as bombs warheads the world’s security can became unstable, because “Only if we abolish nuclear weapons and permanently halt the nuclear power industry we can hope to survive,” and like this avoid terrorist bands which are one of the world’s biggest security concern to acquire nuclear arms from the black market.…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear weapons: a weapon of mass destruction whose explosive power derives from a nuclear reaction.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The process of nuclearisation of both countries Iran and North Korea has emerged the global defence issues once more and this phenomena could be the beginning of snow ball effect into nuclear weapon proliferation. Besides, the rising budget of China military force in parallel with their economic growth has risen to certain extent. The need to worry especially for the East Asia region because of the potential for conflict in this regions. Conflict among nations may also take place from the control of energy and the consumptions of it that has been far more used up for the sake of their industrialization especially by developed and advanced countries like China and India and also by other developing countries. Every state is now preserving how they are able to guarantee their energy security for long term planning strategically for their survival or to win against global economy competition. For example, China has now committed an aggressive…

    • 2981 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction In the last hundred years, life expectancy doubled and many deadly illnesses were eradicated. The world would be a better place to live, had the astonishing scientific discoveries not been devalued with building the atomic bomb an invention that can destroy life on earth in an instant. Fredrick Soddy, who together with Ernest Rutherford discovered in 1901 that radioactivity involved the release of energy, described an atomic future in which humanity could transform a desert continent, thaw the frozen poles, and make the whole Earth one smiling Garden of Eden. While the poles are indeed thawing, the earth hardly looks like paradise. Instead, people fear nuclear Armageddon, and the power of the atom is becoming synonymous with death and destruction. Today, nine states have nuclear weapons and many more can easily acquire those, although only five states are officially recognized as possessing nuclear weapons by the 1968 nuclear Non- Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Those are the United States (1945), Russia (1949), the United Kingdom (1952), France (1960) and China (1964). Three states never joined the NPT but are known to possess nuclear weapons Israel (n/a), India (1974), Pakistan (1998), and North Korea (2006). Two additional states that present immediate proliferation concerns are Iran and Syria. Citizens of those states have paid a heavy price in taxes and/or sanctions and sacrificed opportunities for economic and educational development to build weapons that can destroy their lives. This paper is an overview of the 64years of proliferation history. It is intended to help understand the motives behind the decision to acquire the atomic bomb and grasp the subtle causal relationships between all actors involved in the proliferation chain. Comprehending the politics of proliferation is crucial for devising policy measures to curb the further spread of nuclear weapons. The nuclear-weapon states recognized under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty The…

    • 7814 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paper on Nuclear Weapons

    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The role of nuclear weapons in international politics is one of deterrence and conflict. Webster’s dictionary defines a nuclear weapon as an “explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion.” The definition uses the words “destructive force” as it defines what a nuclear weapon is. These weapons are so destructive that they have only been used twice in the course of warfare, both times were during World War II when the United States sought to end the war. Within a couple of days in August of 1945 the U.S bombed the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The use of these weapons resulted in the deaths of 200,000 people in Japan and caused Japan to surrender officially ending the war. The ethical status of the use of those bombs and the role they played in getting Japan to surrender remains a subject of debate. Though nuclear weapons have not been used in warfare since World War II countries still have nuclear arsenals. These weapons remain a hot button issue in the international community and can be the source of conflict between countries. Furthermore, states have their views on nuclear weapons, whether they are a liberalist view or a realist view, and how they apply to their foreign policy. Nuclear weapons are too destructive a weapon for any state to have. The effects are devastating and in the wrong hands could cause chaos. Nuclear weapons should be destroyed and no country should have a nuclear arsenal. However, this leads to one particular question. Why do states feel they have to be nuclear armed or have nuclear superiority?…

    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today countries all over the world put a significant amount of their budget towards defense and the security along the lines of their borders. Governments all around the world have put great stress on the fact of continuously developing nuclear weapons; this is to help establish their strength over other weaker countries with none or little nuclear power.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    India Problems

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At present, regardless of the hype, India is failing, Wasleka suggests. Politicians and business leaders are always thumping their chests over India's rising importance in the G20 and lobby for a new G10 (the G8 plus India and China). But 200 out of the country's 600 districts are infested with Maoist revolutionaries who know full well their strategy for changing the country is tantamount to suicide. And while China has (belatedly) made its great leap forward, India is still limping two steps ahead and then stumbling back one.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays