Preview

The Civil War Shelby Foote Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
289 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Civil War Shelby Foote Analysis
Shelby Foote was an American historian and novelist who Random House Publishing Company paid to write a history of the civil war. It took him 20 years to write the 3-volume novel “The Civil War: A Narrative.” Writing 500 to 600 hundred words a day and visiting battlefields as needed to make the Novel as factual as possible with all known reliable historical writings. Treating the North and South the same writing he wrote about both the east and west battles. Using the historian’s standard of evidence for his writing. He intentionally did not include the politic or economical causes when writing this historical novel. He wanted it to tell what the North and the South Soldiers were fighting for in their own individual stories and point of view.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    6. Shelby Foote. The Civil War: A Narrative: Fort Sumter to Perryville. (Random House Inc. 1958), 696.…

    • 4616 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the ashes of the Civil War, rose a unified nation still embroiled with one another over memory. David Blight argues in Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory that “Some of the real war, and much of an imagined one, was already getting into the books.” In his argument, Blight demonstrates the distinction between history and memory. For instance, the tendency for publishers to only publish works that depicted the War has heroic rather than reporting on the harsh conditions of the prison camps, had a profound effect on memory. Therefore, as veterans and authors laid down their respective weapons and begin a new, equally fierce battle of words.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Jefferson Davis was the ember, then it was Edward Pollard that provided the wind to start the firestorm in constructing this image of the South with his books The Lost Cause and The Lost Cause Regained. Pollard championed the idea of the South fighting for states’ rights, slavery was not cruel, and the South fought against great odds. Pollard, in his attempt to write history, stated “The Union was nothing more than convenience of the States, and had no mission apart from them.” Pollard saw the political division line between the North and South to be coincidental that this line separated slave holding states and non-slave holding states. Pollard paints the Confederate army as “ragged and poorly-equipped.” This was to contrast the Confederate…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The professors book helped me to understand the truths of the Civil War and introduced a critical view of the war never presented to me before now. Previously, I had been taught and held as truth that the Civil War was fought for slavery, economic purposes, and won by the industry in the North overpowering the agriculture in the South. History books, documents, and movies never told the actual truth, only the bold glory of…

    • 3571 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The loss of the South in the Civil War was the result of various contributions. First of all, they were underequipped in artillery and production factories. The South’s population was about one fourth of the North’s excluding slaves. They were not united and lost because their own philosophical beliefs that destroyed them. Further, the South was underequipped and outclassed in everything industrially. They’re only hope of taking a military advantage was support from European countries. However, those connections were cut when the North blockaded the South and when the North incited the European public to support the North’s effort preventing European interference. Although there was a high morale to serving the Confederacy and to destroying the Union cause, they didn’t have the materials to do so. Many would just fight with stones or any primitive makeshift weapon they could use when they were depleted of bullets because of their low artillery production. The South also had much less supply lines. Their railroads were half that of the North’s and became less as the North decimated the South’s rail lines. The North figured that it would be wiser to destroy their supply lines and weaken the troops. However destroying food lines wouldn’t be a problem because the South couldn’t even supply food because as men were drafted into the army, the agricultural farms withered away due to lack of maintenance. Another disadvantage would be the size of the South. The ratio of people of South to North was about 3 to 7. However 3.5 million of those Southern people were slaves, so the actual ratio would be about 1 to 4. Considering the North’s territorial advantage over the South, it is impressive to see that the South could sustain such a defense over the four years of the war. The reason could be that the South had better trained generals such as…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    All the reasons have a tendency, in the author's point of view, to point to the Republican administration of the Union on the need for drastic change in the leadership of military operations, and the general approach to military and domestic policies. This is especially true of the President Lincoln, whose authority grew, and the government during the war was almost unlimited. The political analysis of the situation of the war years provided throughout the book is not the key purpose of the author of 1861: The Civil War Awakening. The real aim of Goodheart (2011) is to present it fluently as it would be frivolous and arrogant in relation to this complex, multi-dimensional process. To understand the situation of those difficult years, to understand a complex set of problems which confronted Lincoln and his administration, is possible only if a reader grasps as much as possible, in order to break through…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War DBQ Essay

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” This statement that created by President Abraham Lincoln demonstrates the necessity of the Civil War. If the United States were to remain divided, the strength of these two nations would be degraded and allow the continuation of an immoral practice; slavery. “Politicians, business leaders, newspaper editors, and others desperately sought a last-ditch compromise that would keep other states from following South Carolina...no compromise on Earth could reverse the election of Abraham Lincoln and the Southern fears of a “Black Republican” administration” (Roberts 50). As various groups split within the nation, the…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is in fact an interesting piece of literature that was produced by the Bruce Catton, unlike his usual commentary on the American Civil War; his novel captures the sentiments of a young man coming of age and incorporates a strong nostalgic component that has become a major part of the American life (Ch. 11, p. 246). Having been a part of an era, where the aftermath of the war still reverberated throughout the nation and for the author, Catton, those were the stories that he had grown up listening to in rural Michigan.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crane accurately depicts the Civil War for what it is: the bloodiest war in American history. Unlike common Romanticist writers, he employed Naturalism in his work, earning him notice and praise. This novel has proven to be an important piece of literature, as it speaks of serious issues pertinent during the life of Stephen Crane and in the modern world. His writing helped achieve a strong, lasting position for Naturalism in literature. The success of Crane’s writing has since secured him a lasting standing as one of America’s greatest authors. The life Stephen Crane lead influenced the path his novel took, and the American people are all the more grateful for…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    why the war came

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why the War Came: The Sectional Struggle over Slavery in the TerritorieLincoln Reconsidered: Essays on the Civil War Era: David Herbert ...…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil War Homefront

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Davis, Kenneth C. Don 't Know Much about the Civil War: Everything You Need to Know about America 's Greatest Conflict but Never Learned. New York: William Morrow, 1996.…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Race And Reunion Analysis

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Lost Cause, is an assertion by the South that the Civil War was about state’s rights not slavery. Claiming that slavery was benevolent, rather than the usually cruel and violent reality. Bright asserts the belief started immediately following the war and continued to dominate public opinion and the scholarship until the 1930s. He presents three key elements that resulted in the spread of the Lost Cause: “the movement’s effort to write and control the history of the war and its aftermath; its use of white supremacy as both means and ends; and the place of women in its development.” The meaning of benevolent is demonstrated by authors Thomas Page and Joel Harris claiming that slaves were “happy” under slavery. That slaves remained on the plantations, protecting their master’s property or fighting alongside their master’s on the Confederate…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Examining the Civil War

    • 3635 Words
    • 15 Pages

    A war that originated because the nation was divided ultimately marked the beginning of a truly unified United States. The Civil War put to rest the increasing sectionalism that divided the North, the South, and the newly colonized West. At the root were the issues of slavery in the South, and the attempt of the Southern states to withdraw from the Union. Although many lives and untold millions were lost in personal belongings, livestock, and structures, the Civil War set in motion the progression towards a unified Nation. During the 18th and 19th century, slavery was a very significant aspect of the development of the nation. The economic, social, and political development of the nation during this period was directly associated to slavery even though society condemned it as morally wrong. The following will detail the significance of slavery in the economic, social, and political development of the 18th and 19th century America. Additionally details will show the economic, social, and political impacts of the conflict as well as why a democratic nation failed to address the crisis peacefully.…

    • 3635 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sullivan Ballou Analysis

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever wondered what Americans would think about freedom today if the Civil War never occurred? The Civil War was a time where the North and South had a conflict with each other for the rights about freedom to slavery. It also brought families having a disagreement whether or not slavery should be allowed. During the time period of the Civil War, many stories were written. For example, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave by Frederick Douglass and “Sullivan Ballou Letter,” written by Sullivan Ballou. All were written to show how their lives were during the Civil War. Both men, Douglass and Ballou were very much impacted by the Civil War, one of them is a slave and the other fighting for his beliefs about freedom.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fate of Their Country

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "To locate the most direct causes of the American Civil War," he contends in the preface, "one must look at the actions of governmental officeholders in the decades before that horrific conflict." Professor Michael F Holt needs no introduction among historians. He is single handedly regarded as one of the scholars who is most responsible for the emergence of what some call a neo-revisionist interpretation and outlook about the origins and circumstances that resulted in the Civil War. His ideas which are reflected throughout his books especially “The Fate of their country” emphasize that the reasons which caused The Civil War could have been and should have been averted. Defending this ideology Holt criticizes historians who stand by their argument of “Sectional conflict over slavery and slavery extension caused the Civil War”. Instead he preaches throughout his works that include many influential books including “The Fate of their Country” that, contingent political factors played a very huge and predominant role is stimulations factors causing disunion among the states.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays