Preview

The Characteristics Of Non-Human Animals As Laboratory Specimens

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1226 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Characteristics Of Non-Human Animals As Laboratory Specimens
Non-human Animals as Laboratory Specimens
In Biology, it is said that humans has a natural characteristic to consume materials and energy in able for us to pursue the various activities that we encounter in life. This is one of the characteristics that we have as living things. Humans acquire materials and energy through the consumption of food. We, however, do not naturally produce our own source of materials and energy from within us. Our species need an external source which is our environment. Throughout history, the human race learned to use a large quantity of the things that exist on this planet for the sake of survival. One of the most common examples are the animals. Aside from the fact that a large number of human beings depend on
…show more content…
Singer (1993), in his book “Practical Ethics”, may have enumerated a number of situations wherein animals were treated violently such us drug companies that test new shampoos and cosmetics by dripping concentrated solutions of it into the eyes of rabbits and Harlow who reared monkeys under conditions of maternal deprivation and total isolation. However, these examples does not represent the entire practice of experimenting using animals as laboratory specimens. Many scientists observe and follow guidelines in handling specimens and in using non-human animals in research. They are obliged to care for the non-human animal specimens in a manner that ensures good health. Animals must also be treated in the most humane way possible in order to minimize …show more content…
However, a problem may arise when we use animals for such human activity, that is, the possibility of inflicting greater pain, endangering the lives of animals, and worst, causing them to experience death. All of these due to honest human error and imperfections. In a scientific method, after a human identifies the problem, he researches about the problem then formulates a hypothesis. A hypothesis, as some of us know, is an educated guess. It means that this is an assertion based on careful observations and on facts obtained by the human beings through research. However, we must keep in mind that despite the use of factual basis, a hypothesis remains to be a sort of prediction that needs to be validated through experiments. Humans already achieved many things in our pursuit for truth and knowledge. The continuous evolution of technology is already causing a drastic change in our way of life and on how we perceive things. In spite of this, it is widely accepted that we still know very little about everything that exist in our universe and its truth. Humans are still far from perfection. We are still guilty of committing mistakes from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article “Ethical Boundary-work in the Animal Research Laboratory” Pru Hobson-West writes about the three obstacles in regards to the occasion of talking about the ethics behind animal testing. The three “boundaries” that Hobson-West refers to are the need for animals to be tested with reference to the advancement of medicines, the impacts of “Home Office regulation” and the third is the difference between Human and Non-human animals (1). One of the main arguments that supports the use of animals in scientific experiments stated in this article is that when deciding whether or not it is ethical to use animals, you must determine whether or not humans have a higher moral value than animals (660). Another argument is whether or not restrictions…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years, the debate of whether animals have moral rights or not has been thrown around court rooms, social media, and protests. Arguments are made defending animals and suggesting that they should be protected and recognized in human society. Medical researchers are scrutinized and harassed by these supporters for their part in animal testing and medical investigation. Scientific breakthroughs have been made, which has transformed the development of modern medicine. Lifespans have elongated and lives are being saved in every corner of the world, yet somehow, this is still debated as if it is the wrong thing to do. Research animals are pertinent tools of the medical world and humans are entitled to use them as such. As human beings with…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rammy Mekhilef Mr. Drake H Lang and Comp April 20th, 2009 Animal Testing for Research ' Pro side The death of one dog vs. saving the life of many diabetic humans. Which would you pick? Diabetes caused many deaths before insulin was discovered from the pancreas of a dog. After insulin was discovered, it could be injected into the bloodstream to keep the insulin level high. Along with this, much of our medicinal discoveries are experimented on different types of animals. Many people support the banning of experimentation of animals but what they are really supporting is the hindering of scientific advancement. We would not be where we are today without futuristic discoveries without making few sacrifices. One of these sacrifices is the lives of animals. As long as the animal has the capabilities of providing new information, and is not an endangered species, it should have approved usage in science laboratories and departments. Scientific testing on animals should be legal because it provides valuable information, it is safer, and it develops medicinal discoveries. A lot of valuable information comes from testing medicine and other sciences on animals. “Testing drugs in animals before doing so in humans helps researchers find potential toxic side effects, as well as understand the metabolism of drug compounds and consequent effects seen throughout the body” (Cook). Scientists rather would have toxic side effects appear on animals rather than the drug appearing on the market with people unaware that the drug is actually harmful. Also, animal testing is surprisingly one of the most advanced types of research we have today. Other methods are not advanced enough because researchers do their best to keep the kill count low, while also being beneficial to science. Only 6% of animals who are used for research actually experience pain (Animal Testing Facts: Home). Science research should be tested on animals because it is much better than being tested on humans and…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout history animals have been used to test everyday products and medicine to make sure they are safe for human consumption. The animal’s everyday life consist of torture, sleeping in cold cages, and often sometimes dying from the painful experiments performed on them. At times the animals are harmed so much that the start to show signs of erratic behavior like scratching their eyes out, biting themselves, and go through stages of stress or depression. After all the research is completed the animals are killed and thrown into medical waste. In todays the abuse continues. Numerous amounts of rabbits, rats, mice are being held in science laboratories across the world. Countless number of researchers believe that the only way to verify that…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is common knowledge that many animals are used in medical and scientific research. These innocent animals are often obliged to undergo countless of cruel processes and endure great suffering as a result. Despite all the disputes and discussions regarding whether or not animal testing is actually necessary, they wouldn't change the fact that it is, in fact, an extremely cruel thing to do.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Experimentation by Peggy J. Parks describes advantages and disadvantages of animal research. This book explains one of the major social justice issue that is becoming controversial these days: Animal Rights. Scientists are trying to find new vaccines and medical products, but you cannot test them on humans right away. We cannot risk human’s life, but can we risk animal’s life? In 2005, the USDA reported that 1,177,566 animals were used in the laboratory, excluding mice, rats, birds, fish, etc. The scientists mostly failed to make new discovery, and even if they did, it was not effective because humans and animals are very different. Animals are also used in education, but some students and parents consider dissection of animals as teaching…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In time, animals have been stripped of their rights and used to benefit human life through the process of animal experimentation or, animal testing. Around 20 million animals are subjected to this type of research annually in the United States alone (Gershoff 98). This specific…

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal testing is often viewed as “unethical” or “cruel.” However, certain laws have been enacted to protect the rights of animals used in experimentation. Richard L. Crawford explains that these laws include the Animal Welfare Act, which is stated under the Regulations and Standards in the Code of Regulations. Crawford also states in his article, “the act ensures that animals being used for research .must be cared for in humane conditions by a licensed veterinarian… and in accordance with currently accepted professional practice for a particular circumstance or condition.” The…

    • 1005 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals are unique creatures placed all around the world, each with their own genuine, exotic, and weird personalities. Unfortunately, every year, “scientists” use them to test potentially dangerous products that most people use in our everyday lives. Although scientists claim that there is no other way to test them, and that their work ethics are a necessity to keep the society safe, they are wrong. There are many other ways to test animals without harming them, and “scientists” should be using those ways with no problem. Animal testing is inhumane, cruel and unethical, and there are other, non-harmful ways to test.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Relevant thesis. Animal testing is a hot question of debate, because of the bioethics behind it. There are two main sides of the issue to this topic that many people fall into one of the camps of. The first is that of antivivisectionist who believe that any living animal should not be tested on for research purposes. Antivivisectionist would not only note that the pain inflicted upon animals is unneeded for current advances in medicine.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    animal testing

    • 1183 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle and Erasistratus were the first two early Greek physician-scientist performed experiments on living animals. In 1859, Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory reinforced the conception that animals could serve as models for humans in the study of biology and physiology. Animal testing plays a large important role in pharmaceutical and medical advances, but many question the mortality of such use of the animal’s life. More than 100 million aninals are used for testing every single year. Animal testing has brought a lot of positive and negative outcome and there are many different opinions regarding it.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The practice of animal experimentation has increased tremendously over the globe. Animal research is immoral because animals are being subjected to not being properly advocated for, are experiencing detrimental testing and there are alternative methods other than crucial animal experiments. Animal testing is defined as a scientific experiment to where a live animal is forced to undergo something that is likely to cause them “fear, discomfort, pain or distress” (Fisher). Animal experiments include injecting them with harmful substances, exposing animals to radiation, removing organs, forcing them to inhale toxic gases, and other horrifying procedures. Although through animal testing some diseases have been cured, there…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animals can be a useful for research but it should not be always, if we don’t kill animals a lot they can live happily life with their family also we can’t get as their happily life we can’t see it but we can fell it. Therefore, we must try to useless than…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This debate is about whether we should experiment on animals for scientific and medical purposes. For many centuries people have experimented on animals, for particular reasons which have restricted set of rules which have to be done before experimenting any kind of experiment.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays