Top-Rated Free Essay

The case for Britain retaining its uncodified constitution remains extremely strong

Good Essays
‘The case for Britain retaining its uncodified constitution remains extremely strong’ – Discuss

The British constitution itself is flexible as it allows the constitutions to evolve and generally adapt to the changing society. Compared to the US whose constitution is described as ‘rigid’; through the struggle of being able to amend constitutions; for example, the ‘right to bear arms’ amendment, which basically gives registered citizens the right to keep and bear arms (weapons). The topic of amending this constitution is very controversial, however due to the constitution being codified the process is very difficult, as is it entrenched and has been a part of the US culture for centuries. The flexibility of the British constitution is also shown through the constitutional reforms developed by Labour, which not only modernised by also is argued to have strengthened the British constitution. Due to this ability of being flexible and being able to change and adapt, the case for Britain retaining its constitution is in fact ‘extremely strong’.
In this essay, I will be analysing the strengths of the British constitution and comparing it to a codified constitution, I will also discuss its weaknesses and whether ‘extremely strong’ is an exaggeration and it lacks the qualities of a reliable constitution.

During 1997, the Labour party developed a series of manifesto’s stating constitutional reforms which later on came into effect in 2005. They believed the British politics needed to be modernised and brought up to date. Labour also believed that the citizens lacked protections towards their human rights due to the unentrenched uncodified constitution. Lastly, Labour argued the executive to have too much power, with a weak legislature to restrain this power. In 1997, Labour was successful as they won a landslide victory and created a majority government. Many may argue they were successful through the modernisation process, this is shown through the separation of powers, the supreme courts and the battle of reform on the House of Lords, stopping hereditary voting rights. Overall, it is debatable that these changes have not only modernised but also strengthened the British constitution.

The British constitutions is said to follow 3 main sources; statue law, common law and conventions. Statute law identifies the importance of parliamentary sovereignty; as Britain is a unitary state, the doctrine allows the Westminster Parliament to retain supreme political power within the UK system of government, any other power is said to be delegated or even ‘devolved’ powers which ultimately can be withdrawn. The right wing Conservatives argue a codified constitution to undermine the notion of parliamentary sovereignty through its constitution being seen as the ‘highest law’ of the land and cannot be overruled, this is argued to be unconstitutional. One function of the constitution is the importance of the relationships between political institutions; Britain; 'regulates the relationships between the state and the citizen.' (Bill Coxhall, 1998), one way in which this is shown is through the public being able to elect members of parliament to represent them, this way they maintain a strong MP-constituency link which allows the public to hold them accountable and vote them out come next election. Another argument for the British constitution could be its flexibility; this allows the constitution to evolve with the change of society over time, this flexibility also allows for devolution. For example, the Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland Act 1998, created state assemblies for these elected executives.

Another function of a constitution is to clearly outline the rights of the citizens, ensuring the citizens are aware of their right; however, it can be argued that the British constitution is seen as confusing and rather unclear, compared to America where the citizens are able to purchase a book of constitutions which clearly establishing their rights. This results in general unawareness and weakness in protection of the rights. Some may argue that an uncodified constitution allows the government to manipulate and interpret the constitution in a way to fit their own policies; this is because some of the documents are not written and the ones that are written down are not entrenched. For example, the Human Rights Act is one of the documents which are written down but is not entrenched, this results in the government having the right to either manipulate it constitution or completely remove it, highly unlikely but it still a possibility.

In conclusion, the British constitution have many strengths such as; the parliamentary sovereignty (the unitary nature where powers belongs to parliament), its flexibility which allows it to evolve and adapt and unlike the USA, the UK has a one tier legal system which mean there is no ‘higher law’ and no law is supreme enough to get overruled. On the other hand, the constitution has proven to have its weaknesses such as the lack of protections of rights, the rights of the citizens being seen as unclear and lastly government being able to interpret and manipulate the constitution to suit them. Overall, as I mentioned in the introduction the ability of being able to adapt and evolve is crucial for a constitution, without this the Labour party would not have been able to implement any if the changes, therefore overall the British constitution should be retained.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Should the UK’s constitution remain uncodfied? The UK constitution has an uncodified constitution, which means that it cannot be found in any single document unlike the USA’s constitution. Our constitution comes from a number of various sources. Some are written and the others have just been accepted by the Government, such as EU Law, as it derives from the European Union. More examples of sources include the statute law, books written by Bagehot’s “The British Constitution”, which outlined the…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether the UK constitution should remain uncodified is arguable. The UK has an uncodified constitution, therefore it is not found in one single written document, whereas in the USA you are able to buy a copy of the US constitution in nearly any bookshop found. If we did have a codified constitution, rules would be written down which increases us to understand and claim our rights and it will be done more frequently. However, with an uncodified constitution, it is adaptable and makes amendments easily…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should the British constitution remain uncodified or codified A constitution merely describes the foundation principles or “established precedents” in which a state or institution is governed. The United Kingdom (as well as one other sovereign institution) rely on an“unique” constitution that is described as un-codified, with most states running a codified constitution. The difference between a codified constitution and an uncodified constitution can be represented through physical properties:…

    • 684 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Should the UKs constitution remain uncodified? A constitution is a set of rules which may be written or unwritten, establishes the distribution of power in a political system, the limits of government jurisdiction, the rights of citizens and the method of amending the constitution itself. An uncodified constitution is unwritten, or at least not written all in one document. The constitution in the UK is found in a variety of sources which are mainly statute and common law, conventions and traditions…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1 What is a Constitution? 2 Explain the difference between a Codified and an Uncodified Constitution 3 State the Advantages of an Uncodified Constitution 1.)A constitution is what sets the guidelines for a country. It lays out who has power, what peoples rights are, and generally what sort of system the country will be run under. The basic concept of the modern constitution which is used today was originally based on the idea of John Locke that the country should be governed under rules and guidelines…

    • 820 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    difference between a codified and uncodified constitution? Below are presented some differences between codified and uncodified constitutions. The first differnce between this two sorts of constitutions is that the codified is written in one document while uncodified has a variety of sources. For example, the US constitution is a single document where is written a set of principles, in contrast to US constitution UK constitution is an uncodified document that is drawn from five different…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Britain introduce a codified constitution? The British constitution is unwritten, although it may be less misleading to call it uncodified as various aspects of the constitution are written down. The term uncodified means the constitution is not all kept in a single document, but is spread about in various pieces of legislature. It also means British laws, policies and codes are developed through statutes, common law, convention, and recently European Union law. Although the British constitution…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    present in Britain we have no written constitution, but instead have a collection of laws and conventions that govern our political system. Along with Israel, we are one of only two democracies in the world not to have a written constitution. A more precise way of describing our constitution is that it is uncodified, which means that parts of it are written down but it is not a single authoritative document or set of rules. The main argument against a written constitution is that Britain has survived…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Should Britain have a fully written codified Constitution? Britain is one of the oldest democracies in the world, which has gradually evolved from Magna Carta in 1215 to the modern time. But one thing significantly differs the UK from all other democratic countries- that is its Constitution [which is a set of principles that establishes the distribution of power within a political system, the limits of government jurisdiction, the rights of citizens and the method of amending the Constitution itself]…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recruiting or Retaining

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    CASE: WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT – RECRUITING OR RETAINING? G.K Electronics Ltd., is a pioneering and internationally reputed firm in the Electronics industry. It is one of the largest firms in the country. It attracted employees from internationally reputed institutes and industries by offering high salaries, perks etc. It has advertised for the position of an Electronics Engineer recently. Nearly 150 candidates working in various electronics firms applied for the job. Mr. Sashidhar, an Electronics…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays