The Case Against Animal Testing

An issue that is being discussed is whether people should promote animal testing. Certainly, animal testing can be successful sometimes in saving lives but I believe that it is more important to think about animals dying than people being saved because usually it is unsuccessful which basically results in animals dying for no good reason. In other words, I believe that animal testing should not be allowed because it results in poor test results, is cruel and inhumane, and may mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatments. One reason why I am against animal testing is because it can result in poor test results. For example, in the article from Studyread.com, it says “For example, animals cannot think, show other psychological symptoms as humans.” What this quote is trying to say is that animals can’t tell/show people that they are experiencing side effects making people think that it is a good cure for whatever they're trying to cure. This is just like kids experiencing punishment from their parents because the parents are basically testing to see if the punishment is effective enough
http://animal-testing.procon.org/ explained “Some chemicals that are harmful to animals prove valuable when used by humans. Aspirin, for example, is dangerous for some animal species. What i'm trying to say is that if you're to busy trying to find treatments based on tests, you may not find one because they maybe too focused on it that it may make them ignore potential treatments. They explain that a commonly used medicine name Aspirin may help humans with certain conditions but when it comes to animals that have the same conditions, doctors may think it's the same even though animal and human bodies are so much more different. This may cause doctors to be so focused about one thing when the potential cure is probably already