Preview

The British Election System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1032 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The British Election System
Why the UKs election system is better suited at representing the people.

The United States of America and Great Britain are bot considered to be great Democracies. A democracy is a form of government in which people choose leaders by voting, and a fundamental principle of democracy is citizen participation. Citizens have the right to vote, but they must also accept the results of the election, whether they agree with the outcome or not. In a democratic society, they also try to prevent the government from abusing power. In fewer words, Democracy is power to the people in choosing their leader. Both Great Britain and America fulfill many of the fundamental principles of democracy when it comes to their electoral systems. Both election systems
…show more content…
In this way, he represents the people who made him Prime Minister. The President of the United States can find it difficult to get his proposals enacted into laws because of the views of the Congress or the Supreme Court. (Watts 60) One of the principles of democracy is for the people to be able to prevent the elected government from abusing their power. If the politicians do not keep their promises to the people, they are held accountable, have to answer for their actions and are reminded that they work for the people. In Britain, what the politicians promised during their campaign, is set in stone, and they have to answer for it if they are unable to fulfill those promises, while, in America, the politicians can change their agenda after winning. The British way ensures that the politicians work for the people who voted for them. The people want accurate information, a greater focus on the issues that concern them (Oakland …show more content…
The American system loses credibility because the candidates have to be able to afford the campaign if they want to get elected. Thus, only a few Americans can participate in the election, and people can only vote for those few who can afford it. In Britain, there are more candidates to choose from, but also less time. The candidates only have a few weeks to convince the people to vote for them. Both countries do include many principles of democracy in their systems, but there is still work to be done. In conclusion, it can be claimed that the British election system is best suited to represent its people because its government is held directly accountable to the people, the candidates come from a more varied background, and money is not a crucial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In recent times many commentators have pointed out that the UK’s Prime Ministers are increasingly acting like Presidents- of course the UK Prime Minister cannot actually become a President as the system would not allow it. Below I shall be analysing and explaining the factors that highlight the growth of presidentialism in the UK, as well as the points which suggest that the UK’s Prime Minister is still a Prime Minister.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second way in which the UK democracy participation can be strengthened is making voting compulsory. Compulsory voting is very self-explanatory and basically means that the government will enforce voting upon those eligible and will only accept the vote if the turnout is 90%+. The main advantage of making voting compulsory is that there would obviously be greater participation and interest in politics. The more people that vote the better because then everyone would have had their say in what way the country should be ran and it will create a fairer result. Also an interest in politics would develop as people would want to know what they were voting for.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that Prime ministers are almost omnipotent in the political system in the UK, this is due to the shear variety of powers in-which the prime minister holds, and the prerogatives that are taken advantage by the prime minister. However, checks on powers in the UK means that the prime minister is not as power as they appear, moreover, they are not separable from the UK political system, henceforth, they are controlled and limited within the system they are part of, thus, more often than not, prime ministers are less powerful then sometimes claimed.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Eric Foner in his book Give Me Liberty!, politics in the eighteenth-century America had a more democratic quality than in Great Britain. In Britain the requirement of voting laws was property qualification. The main purpose of this was to guarantee that men who had an economic stake in society and the independence of judgment would be the ones to determine the policies of the government.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The big problems of the electoral system were particularly evident in the 2000 elections: There may have been significant discrepancies between the voter decision and the electoral vote; a candidate who obtains the most vote’s nationwide, does not necessarily have to combine the most electors. Al Gore won in 2000, the absolute majority of votes, but received fewer votes in the Electoral College as his opponent George W. Bush. Another disadvantage is the focus of the candidates on states where pollsters cannot predict a clear decision (in particular, the traditional Swing States). The other states get little attention during the election campaign, often sequentially resulting in below average turnouts. The same is shared in the coastal states…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a democracy, people choose their leaders by voting, and everyone is treated equally. Democracy revolves around rule by the majority. In my opinion, colonial America was on its way to democracy, but far from being a true democratic society. Only a small portion of the people were able to make the decisions, so government did not revolve around the majority.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Only 57.5 percent of americans vote for the president. That is just over half of our population that votes for the person that is running our country for 4 years. There are many flaws with the american elections process, and there are many other forms of government such as parliament and what those major differences between our system of government which is representative democracy and parliament.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those that argue that Britain is not a liberal democracy often argue that it cannot be because it does not have a written constitution. This means that there are no fundamental laws to safeguard against attempts by government to take more power than they should. They often argue that there is clear evidence from recent terrorist and security threats that the UK culture is no longer tolerant but is becoming overly intolerant of cultures and religions that it perceives to be a threat. They would also argue that under the umbrella or indeed excuse of national security, information is increasingly kept from the public and this in turn causes damage to the public interest. They would also argue that the UK ‘first past the post’ election system is inherently unfair, as it is very rare that a…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A democracy is, by definition, “a political regime in which the power base is constitutionally given to the people” (pg. 698). A system of popular voting would directly give the power to the people - the voters - to elect their national representative - the president. In the system of the Electoral College, a candidate without the majority support by the people has the possibility to win the election. One example of this is that “in the election of 2000, George W. Bush won the presidency with 271 votes in the Electoral College even though he had fewer popular votes than his opponent Al Gore ” (pg. 192). This possibility causes the Electoral College to be undemocratic. A popular voting system is more democratic because the president would be the choice of the majority of the…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence for the statement is that usually a strong effective government chosen by the voters is produced. This helps Britain move forward and progress with new laws and policies. In 1997 one of the strongest governments was formed. Tony Blair leading the Labour party was elected to power with a huge 63% of the seats. This helped Blair do things like taking troops to war five times, more than any other PM in history. Without the hugely strong government it is less likely he could have done this.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American democracy is one of the very calm kinds of government in the world while it is a long way from ideal. The American democracy in which we exist has several strengths and weaknesses. Neither strengths or weaknesses out weigh one another, however it is important to have both due to the changing definitions. A democracy is a government that is run by the people. The politicians that we elect to run…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Linkage institutions can be defined as institutions that connect citizens with the government. Examples of linkage institutions include elections, political parties, interest groups, and the media. Elections specifically are supposed to encourage public participation in the selection of governmental officials. Unfortunately, low voter turnout has proved that elections are an imperfect linkage institution. Elections depend on voters to be successful, and some factors that relate to the likelihood of voting include age, education, and race. Although some people underestimate the power of the vote, voter turnout is important to the future stability of the country. Without elections, the United States would not be the same powerful world power that it is today.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Society grants every citizen of legal age the right to vote in elections. The Electoral College provides electoral votes to candidates based popular votes. The Electoral College is unfair to popular vote as it is an indirect system of voting where citizens are not directly voting for the President. This system grants 538 electors to become the voice of 319 million.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Voting In America

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Americans pride themselves over living in a representative democracy, a republic in which citizens have an influence on the government. A democracy entails ...Citizens are able to influence the government by electing representatives they believe would best embody their beliefs. Voting in the United States has not always been a right granted to all citizens. Historically, white men of elite status were the only ones allowed ability to vote. however, with the ratification with amendments such as: the Fifteenth Amendments which provided African-Americans the right to vote, the Nineteenth Amendment which granted women’s suffrage, and the Twenty-Sixth lowered the voting to eighteen years old to previously twenty on years of age. Through these…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Voting in America

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One huge problem with the current voting system is voter turnout. In a study done by the US Census Bureau, in the November 2008 elections, only 63.6% of the 71.0% registered population voted (Table 02-1). That is 45.2% of the citizen population. It is impossible for a true democracy to be functioning if less than the majority of the people are making the decisions, and our leaders are chosen by the majority of the minority of the people.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays