The Aerospace & Defense Industry
The Boeing Company
Table of Contents
1. PRESENTATION OF THE BOEING COMPANY
1.1 Industry Analysis
1.2 Business of The Boeing Company
1.3 Origin and History’s Timelines of The Boeing Company
8 1.4 Management and Organizational Structure of The Boeing Company
11 1.5 The Corporate Strategy of The Boeing Company
2. THE SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE BOEING COMPANY
3. THE MARKET POSITION OF THE BOEING COMPANY
3.1 The potential threat of new sellers entering the market
21 3.2 The threat of substitute products becoming available in the market
21 3.3 The impact of the suppliers on the sellers
3.4 The power exerted by the customers in the market
3.5 The competitive intensity: the rivalry between existing sellers in the market
22 4. THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE OF THE BOEING COMPANY
5. THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE BOEING COMPANY
5.1 Liquidity Ratios
5.2 Profitability Ratios
5.3 Asset Turnover Ratios
6. STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
6.1 Linear Regression Analysis and Calculation of Beta
6.2 The Boeing Company’s Stock Price Performance
6.3 EADS Stock Price Performance
6.4 Comparative Analysis
6.5 Market Value Measures
7. RISK FACTORS OF THE BOEING COMPANY
7.2 External Events
7.4 Financial Risks
8. OVERALL APPRAISAL AND OUTLOOK
This corporate analysis provides a financial evaluation of The Boeing Company, in the period from 2006 to 2009. This analysis has been conducted based on a continuous and relevant comparison against its main competitor EADS over the considered period.
The analytical procedures used in this report include financial ratios (long-term solvency ratios, liquidity ratios, profitability ratios, asset turnover ratios and market value measures) and a linear regression analysis. The focus and the purpose of those computations were to enable us to assess the trend in The Boeing Company’s financial performance over time.
The results of our analysis demonstrate that The Boeing Company can be regarded as a better investment than its main competitor, EADS. Our study illustrates that The Boeing Company has a more robust financial performance than EADS, due to a more efficient use of its short-term assets, a higher average gross profit margin and a higher profit generated from total assets. Furthermore, our results show that The Boeing Company also sells its products faster, collects its credit sales at a higher pace and uses its assets more effectively to generate sales. This analysis also proves that the stock of The Boeing Company is slightly riskier than EADS and the average stock within the Aerospace and Defense Industry. Nevertheless, due to an Earnings Per Share higher than EADS over the considered period and a Price-Earnings Ratio above the industry, we have concluded with some degree of certainty that the market has greater expectations (e.g. higher growth opportunities) to The Boeing Company.
This report demonstrates the future prospects of The Boeing Company to be brighter than those of its competitors in both the commercial and the defense segments, due to strong forecasted orders for commercial aircrafts within the next two decades, and an increase in homeland security investments and military expenditures in rapidly growing markets. Nonetheless, our analysis also reviles that the company is still facing significant and probable risks. One of the most significant risks in this regard is the company’s overall management style that has caused labor and supply chain issues for a few years. Those issues have impacted the production and the delivery of the company’s products negatively, and as a result the organization’s financial performance. Other...
Bibliography: Boeing. (2010, Oct. 09). The Boeing Company. Retrieved from http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/aboutus/
Business & Company resource center
Chicago business. (n.d.). Retrieved 11 27, 2010, from http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20101117/NEWS05/101119889/boeing-787-delivery-could-be-delayed-another-year-analyst
Chicago Business. (n.d.). Chicago Business. Retrieved 11 26, 2010, from http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20101110/NEWS05/101119992/boeing-stops-dreamliner-test-flights-after-emergency-landing-in-texas
Datamonitor. (2009 ). Global Aerospace & Defense. Datamonitor .
Deloitte, Touche Tohmatsu. (2010). Compass 2010, Global Aearospace & Defense sector outlook. Deloitte.
Examiner. (n.d.). Examiner.com . Retrieved 11 26, 2010, from http://www.examiner.com/general-aviation-in-national/eu-voting-on-stricter-european-pilot-certification-regulations?render=print
Financial Times. (2010, 0ctober 21). Aircraft demand on the up, says Boeing. Chicago, USA: Financial Times.
Payte, J. M. (2008, January). Regression Analysis and Excel.
Porter, M. (1996). What is Strategy. Harvard Business Review , 77-78.
PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2010). A&D Insigths, Accelerating global growth. PWC.
Ross, S. W. (2007). Modern Financial Management. McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 8 edition.
The Boeing Company. (2010, Nov 06). Boeing.com . Retrieved Nov 06, 2010, from http://investor.shareholder.com/ba/stock.cfm?pageshow=financials
The Boeing Company
The Street Ratings. (2010). Stock valuation-Boeign CO. Thestreet.com .
Thomson Reuters. (2010). Thomson Reuters. Retrieved Nov. 2010, from http://www.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE6A514K20101106?type=companyNews
World Economic Forum. (2009). The Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010. World Economic Forum.
Yahoo Inc. (2010, Nov 07). Yahoo Finance. Retrieved Nov 07, 2010, from http://biz.yahoo.com/ic/610.html
Please join StudyMode to read the full document