Preview

The Blame Of The Boston Massacre In American History

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
578 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Blame Of The Boston Massacre In American History
The Boston Massacre was a very significant event in American history. Although a single group cannot be blamed for the event in its entirety, the British soldiers should receive most of the blame. It should be noted, however, that the colonists did play a role in causing the incident. The actions that the British took the night of the Massacre were unnecessary. According to William Tant’s unbiased account in Primary Source #2 of what happened that night while the Bostonians were simply throwing “some more snow balls”, “instantly the soldiers fired one after another. In his recollection of the Boston Massacre, Captain Preston also included “snowballs being thrown” and how “instantly three or four soldiers fired one after another”. As a British captain, Preston would bend the facts as much to the soldiers’ favor as possible allowing one to infer that his testimony of what happened during the event would have left out certain other wrong doings of the British soldiers, making the actions of the soldiers potentially worse than what Preston admitted to. Considering that the British soldiers were firing guns and taking away lives, the throwing of snowballs by the Bostonians is minute. Taking away lives is extreme and uncomparable to getting hit by a cold ball of frozen water. As demonstrated through Primary Source #5 which is Paul …show more content…
He states that, “Judgement of Death against those Soldiers would have been as foul a Stain upon this Country as the Executions of the Quakers or Witches.” He then continues to say, “This however, is no Reason why the Town should not call the Action of that Night a Massacre”. In other words, Adams recognizes that the soldiers could not have been entirely blamed for the event since the Bostonians provoked them to do so, but also that they took matters too far by murdering the Bostonians who were simply throwing snowballs at

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Boston Massacre was started by a series of events that included citizens of the colonies tangling up with British soldiers leading up to the March 5th event with soldiers trying to maintain order against the angry, violent protesters. While it is still controversial as to which party is to take the blame for this incident, the violent but non-fatal crowd or the threatened soldiers. Either way, there is no question this event had a major impact on the new nation and as John Adams put it:…

    • 3432 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sons of Liberty decided to harass a couple of British Soldiers Stationed at Boston. The Soldiers had no choice but to fire on the crowd killing a few people, this was called the Boston massacre. Later a British Official decided to confront John Hancock for smuggling tea. Later the sons of liberty destroyed an entire shipment of British tea. This Caused Great Britain to bring in even harsher laws. These included the following, British…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriots Vs Loyalists

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Patriots felt they needed justice against the Loyalists because since there was no intention to fire, they shouldn't have. If the Loyalists heard “FIRE” that doesn't mean they needed to fire especially if they weren't doing anything wrong. However, Candidus, a Loyalist, did not think they should get justice because they thought they were just doing their duty, they argued that, they heard “fire” so they fired and did what they were supposed to do. When they heard fire they knew it was important but in the text it says “It was clear that the soldiers need to protect themselves from the aggressive mob and the shots were fired in self defense with no actual order to fire.” Another difference between the Patriot and Loyalists’ viewpoints was that, The patriots were throwing snowballs at the loyalists that seemed to them to be ice balls. The loyalists took it as a threat. The patriots wanted justice against the loyalists. In the passage it says “According to Captain Preston, under an officer’s code of honesty, there was never an intention to actually fire.”, but the Loyalists point of view was, the patriots were throwing snowballs at the Loyalists, they seemed to be ice balls to the loyalists. They took that as a threat. The loyalists heard “FIRE” so they followed commands and did what they were supposed to do, it doesn't matter who yelled it, it just matters that they heard it so they fired. In the passage it says “The soldiers fired in self defense into a angry mob led by a few men trying to inspire a rebellion in the colonies… soldiers, at their duty posts, minding their own business and acting non- confrontational, were verbally assaulted by Bostonian men with epitaphs of “bloody back”, “lousy rascal”,...scoundrel” and “lobster”. Clearly, the two sides had different views on this topic, and ultimately, these differences led to arguments between…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Boston Massacre Patrick carr and Samuel Maverick two of the wounded people that died were buried march 17th 1770. The Boston Massacre was the first spark for american independence. The British authorities were removed after Massacre. The Patriots were exaggerating this event they had many campaigns. Many people believe that it was the first battle of the american revolutionary war. The colonist disliked the British after the Massacre and did not want to trade or have anything to do with them.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Boston Massacre Alyssa Ladd Although many historians believe that the Boston Massacre was an act of murder, it is clear that the incident was an act of self-defense. First reason why it was self-defense, is that the colonist Crispus Attucks was holding a cordwood stick and swung it at James Bailey. James Bailey then shot Crispus Attucks. James Bailey shot Crispus Attucks in act of self-defense. This led on to more shootings, but more colonists were getting angry and more violent. Another reason why it was self-defense, is that the captain of the British soldiers Preston, never did say fire and he never ordered his troops to fire. The colonists were taunting the soldiers by saying, "Fire, fire," which lead to more confusion. Also, Captain…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    March fifth, 1770 was a gruesome culmination of high tensions between the British forces and colonists inhabiting Boston. There is no doubt that this was one of the most appalling displays of bloodshed in history; but who is to blame for the instigation of this deplorable event? I believe that it was the British soldiers of the 29th regiment who initiated the Boston Massacre. Although the soldiers were somewhat provoked by the crowd on king street and by the ropewalk workers, the soldiers had a responsibility, and were duty-bound to keep peace, not to kill innocent civilians. The British also had an irresponsible, hot headed motive behind their fighting and firing: revenge. If the British hadn't sought out revenge on the Bostonians for the ropewalk fights, the bloody events that followed may never have happened.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Boston Massacre, five Americans without guns were shot and killed by British soldiers (Doc 1). The redcoats were violent, and they murdered several defenseless colonists. Unlike Loyalists, Patriots felt a sense of loyalty to those who died because of the soldiers. “...these colonies now feel the disasters of fire, sword, and famine.” (Doc 3). Under British rule, families and children were suffering. “...against all violence we have endured, we have taken up arms.” When the British attacked the colonies repeatedly, the Patriots rose up to defend their…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Analytical Essay The Boston Massacre is one of the most controversial events in American history that occurred in Boston before the American Revolution. Certainly, it has a fundamental role in the development of America as a nation, which led it to have a huge motivation for revolution. A heavy British military presence and having very high taxes in the country were some of the main reasons that made Boston citizens very irritated. Thus, there were already many disagreements and tensions between inhabitants and the British that could have led to the Massacre. In this essay, I will carefully analyze three primary sources, and compare these to the interpretation given by HBO’s John Adams. In my view, these sources can be divided into two groups in which the article of Boston Gazette and the picture of Paul Revere, “The Bloody Massacre” can stand together against the other two sources, the letter of Captain Thomas Preston and John Adams HBO miniseries. However, the most valuable and credible sources for me were the HBO miniseries John Adams (2008) and the letter of Captain Thomas Preston, which in my opinion, are very logical and describe the natural outcome of all the disagreements and tensions between Boston citizens and British soldiers.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the war and The soldiers fired at the the crowd. Then the colonists were up and arms about the Boston Massacre so the King and Parliament were forced to have the soldiers tried in court at the colonies and The King had John Adams be the lawyer for the soldiers and John Adams accepted because he thought everyone deserves the right to a lawyer. “Quickly becoming known as the Boston Massacre, the episode further propelled the colonies toward war with the British. Flames were fanned even more when the eight soldiers involved in the incident and their captain Thomas Preston were acquitted on the grounds of…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boston Massacre Dbq

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Document 3, Account of the Boston Massacre, “A townsman with a cudgel struck him over the hands with such force…” This writing means that the colonists had clubs to fight back against the British and protect themselves. Although the British had much more powerful weapons, such as guns, the colonist were able to bring much harm to them as well. In Benjamin Edes’, Account of the Boston Massacre, a colonist “aimed a blow at the Captain’s head which grazed his hat and fell pretty heavy upon his arm”. A massacre is defined as an event where a large amount of people are killed and the victims cannot defend themselves. The fact that the colonists had clubs to defend themselves, proves the point that this event was not a massacre. As mentioned…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Bunker Hill was a large violent approach by the British. It brutally murdered colonists during a fierce battle, the colonists had barely that much of an advantage because of their choice of weapons and the farmers who never had experience vs the army of GB aka the world’s superpower. The Boston Massacre 1770 was a large example of the physical abuse brought on by the British army. British troops killed colonists through a riot furthering the colonist’s anger towards Britain. The Battles of Lexington and Concord was the same, because it was mainly physical abuse/violent attacks. The Boston Tea Party was an example of the colonist’s revolt against Britain. Protesters to the tea act dumped East India’s tea into the Boston…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there were many important topics covered throughout Chapter 7, I thought the most important was the Boston Massacre, and it has left a long lasting impression on history in America. On March 5, 1770, the redcoats began to be tormented by about sixty towns-people. Outnumbering a group of redcoats six to one, they threw snowballs, sticks, and stones at them, angry that an eleven-year-old boy had been shot during a protest ten days later. As a result to the towns-people's protest, the troops had to open fire, hurting or killing eleven people. The Boston Massacre caused many more fights and protests to break out around Boston, and the urge to be free from British rule.…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Colonist View

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are two popular views of the Boston Massacre, the pro-colonist view and the pro-British view. Neither of the views are entirely accurate, the true events of that night are found in the ‘middle ground’ of the accounts. No matter how truthful one account is believed to be, it is impossible for it to be entirely accurate because they couldn't know the intent of the opposing side.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Boston massacre supports Paine’s ideas in a huge way. It shows just what he talks about in his writings, how the British are too controlling over the colonists, to the point that they are killing their men.…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The reason why the Kent State Massacre is the only true massacre between these two happenings is because by definition a massacre is the unnecessary killing of a large number of human beings and because the colonist in the Boston Massacre provoked the British troops by verbally…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays