Preview

The Benefits Of Groupthink

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
523 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Benefits Of Groupthink
Putting together a team to cohesively work on a project or a goal in theory should be effective. But after a while without the benefit of outside independent thinkers or questioning the thoughts/actions of others within the group the process can become tainted. Eventually “ concurrence-seeking becomes so dominant in a cohesive ingroup that it tends to override realistic appraisal of alternative courses of action”1. The group's original purpose of creation becomes more and more ineffective as long as groupthink festers without treatment.

What is groupthink exactly? According to psychologists is “deterioration in mental efficiency, reality testing and moral judgments as a result of group pressures”1. In simpler terms it is the fear of ruining group cohesion and uniformity by going with the current instead of branching out with ideas that oppose it. Instead of achieving consensus they instead suppress critical thinking in order to achieve concurrence. But that’s not to say that every group whether large or small suffers from groupthink. Groupthink is not predetermined on each and every group that comes together to
…show more content…
The infamous bay of pigs invasion was planned by the Eisenhower administration and eventually carried out by the Kennedy administration after he took over. “The administration ignored questions and accepted stereotypes about the Cubans without questioning whether the Central Intelligence Agency information made sense”2. Or the bombing of Pearl Harbor when the leaders of Pearl Harbor ignored signs of the invasion but citing the fact that Japan would be wasting their efforts if they chose their course of action due to the relative power difference between the two countries. Or the United States invasion of Iraq when given false information the information was never challenged but instead intensified due to the September 11th

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The definition of a group is “two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular objectives” (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p. 277). As a group, you can either work together well, or poorly. Groups can appoint individual members to certain parts of assignments, or individual tasks and then collaborate later together in a group discussion. This can cause functional or dysfunctional conflict. Functional conflict can be worked through even when individuals have different points of view (conflict). Dysfunctional conflict however, can ruin the integrity of the group and cause extreme conflicts. “One researcher says that the problems of brainstorming demonstrate the problems of groups. If you leave groups to their own devices, he says, they’re going to do a very miserable job” (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p. 278).…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary threat to sound decision making and problem solving with a group that experiences extreme cohesiveness is a phenomenon called groupthink.…

    • 961 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4) Groupthink is when individuals held back their stating views in a meeting and agreed to someone else's position or can go along with the boss suggestion when in fact the individual disagreed with suggestions. These caused a highly cohesive teams to lose their critical evaluative capabilities. There are several symptoms of groupthink such as illusions of invulnerability, Belief in inherent group morality, self-censorship by members, illusions of unanimity, mind guarding, rationalizing unpleasant and disconfirming data. Illusions of invulnerability are one symptom of groupthink because the members who form part of the team assume that the team is well capable of criticism or is beyond attack. The belief in inherent group morality…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to study.com website (2015), a groupthink can simply be defined as an occurrence that gives a group of people a fault verdict or a conclusion a that a group has made that is an ineffective decision whereby it was reached just to appease the spirit of harmony among group members than allowing individuals to act independently and creatively. As alluded on, groupthink blocks individual creativity by ignoring alternatives allowing irrational actions to tale precedence. It happens most when individuals have similar background and the group is refusing external opinions. The result are that the decisions are flawed and they often come at a cost.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Walter Lippmann, an American writer, reporter, and political commentator, once said, “Where all think alike, no one thinks very much”. Groupthink is the process of thinking as a group in a way that discourages creativity or individual responsibility. Arthur Miller, an American playwright, essayist, and prominent figure in the twentieth century, wrote The Crucible to warn the American people of groupthink and the abuse of its power. Groupthink has its benefits which allows groups to come to a conclusion and socialize. However, its power can be abused to harm a community. Groupthink is an important part of our history because it has had an extremely negative effect on people and their societies even with its benefits.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group Think Scenario

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The group basically has a mutual understanding. There is an underlying silent code that is never questioned by anyone. The members all have their own views but choose to accept the views of the group leader in order to keep with the group conscience. All of the committee members know each other, they are all from the same social background, and have the commonality of sharing the same kind of ideology. This group homogeneity is an example of groupthink. No one in the group…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group decision making can be very helpful in getting different thoughts and opinions out of discussion, but also can be dangerous because of groupthink. Groupthink occurs when people avoid individually testing, analyzing, and evaluating facts in order to avoid upsetting the consensus of a group. In effect a conflict occurs whereby some topics are okay to discuss while others are closed often without the group being consciously aware of it. Those who violate the unspoken rules often find themselves being ostracized, alienated and ultimately expelled from the group.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Groupthink Bad?

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Groupthink is a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment that results from in-group pressure (Verderber, Verderber, & Sellnow, 2011). Groups affected by groupthink ignore alternatives and tend to take irrational actions that dehumanize other groups (Miller, 2010). A group is especially vulnerable to groupthink when its members are similar in background, when the group is insulated from outside opinions, and when there are no clear rules for decision making (Miller, 2010).…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social psychologist Irving Janis (1972) coined the term groupthink (Allyn & Bacon, 1998). Several factors must be involved to consider a decision as a groupthink behavior. For example, individuals will not examine other avenues of behavior; also, they will not criticize the groups’ behavior. There is usually a negative consequence of this type of behavior. Lack of self-esteem can contribute to an individual’s ability to remain autonomous. This type of individual will succumb to the groups’ behavior. A hypothetical scenario where groupthink might take place would be in a social network like high school. In high school, where we need to fit in, peer pressure and the like, it is very easy to believe that one group could influence an individual to go along with an activity, even if it is not on their moral compass. Of course, if this groupthink allows an individual to continue with destructive behavior, then a therapeutic intervention may be necessary. An obvious destructive group behavior that encompasses peer pressure is drug abuse. It is hard to separate groupthink from peer pressure, even though peer pressure can involve one individual influencing another; it still follows the same line of thinking.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Group Minds

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dismissing your own individual opinions to reach group consensus, now that’s negative peer pressure! Peer pressure will always be a problem and can affect anyone. I say that because no matter where you’re from or who you are, peer pressure is lurking about. Anytime you’re pressured to do something and your conscience is telling you not to do it, and you follow through with the task anyway, that is dismissing your opinion just to please other group members. Not wanting to be ostracized by others is the basis of conformity. Peer pressure doesn’t discriminate against race, nationality, or social class. It’s like a plague waiting to spread like wildfire throughout your school, your workplace, even your home-life. Some may think that’s too dramatic, but I envision it as the horrid truth. The article “Group Minds,” written by Doris Lessing, comes from her series of the 1985 Massey Lectures. Lessing declares “When we 're in a group, we tend to think as that group does: we may even have joined the group to find "like-minded" people. But we also find our thinking changing because we belong to a group.” I believe that no one realizes that their opinions are at risk of becoming dismissed just because they want to fit. The new-comers insist on becoming accepted, and as a result of that, we tend to forget about our own opinions, whether we agree or not.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink is when the majority of people in a group have the same idea and someone one with a different opinion feels like they must be wrong rather than the whole group. They then follow the group unquestioningly. (Sociology and Social Psych Concepts) In Germany at this time, there was a large quantity of people who agreed with what Hitler said, which made the people who didn’t feel outcast. They would then join the group because they “must be wrong” if they are the only one. Although some people felt like they should help the Jews, the thought of being different from the majority scared them ,so they remained silent.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Groupthink is defined by American psychologists as a phenomenon that occurs when a group makes detrimental decisions based on pressure from the group. Throughout William Golding’s book, The Lord of the Flies, groupthink occurs a number of times.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Groupthink is when a group of people makes irrational decisions with the desire of peace and harmony.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In American psychologist Irving Janis’ work Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascos, Janis defines groupthink as the “psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses disagreement and prevents the appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups” (Janis 9). Janis successfully links the groupthink theory to events such as the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Bay of Pigs invasion, the Iran-Contra affair, the escalation of the Vietnam War in the 1960’s, and domestic scandals, such as the cover up of Watergate (Hart; Janis). To support the likeliness of the Bush administration suffering from groupthink, Janis terms three casual antecedent conditions and lists the eight symptoms of groupthink. The three antecedent conditions are: 1) group cohesiveness; 2) structural faults; 3) provocative situational context. The first antecedent condition, group cohesiveness is ambiguous, but the second (structural faults) and third (provocative context) conditions are certain. The eight symptoms of groupthink, defined by Janis, are: 1) Illusion of invulnerability; 2) Collective rationalization; 3) Belief in inherent morality; 4) Stereotyped view of out-groups; 5) Direct pressure on dissenters; 6)…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority of people tend to view themselves as independent human beings. It is their belief that the responses they provide are based on their personal knowledge of the subject. However, in Doris Lessing’s article “Group Minds,” Lessing discusses the lack of individualistic thinking that is present when people are involved in a group setting. In the article, Lessing describes how the pressures of the majority group almost always seem to overrule the minority’s decision even when the minority is correct. The statements proclaimed in Lessing’s article are similar to those stated in Solomon E. Asch’s article, “Opinions and Social Pressure” and Saul McLeod’s titled “The Milgram Experiment,” in that they are both in agreement on fact that the majority will nearly always overtake the minority.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays