Preview

The Arrow Pratt Coefficient

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3277 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Arrow Pratt Coefficient
III. The Arrow-Pratt coefficient

Considering Bernoulli’s proposition that utility matters over wealth for risky behavior, and adding the fact that no two economical agents are alike, we can state that risk aversion can vary very widely across individuals. In this section we examine the coefficient determined by the two economists Kenneth arrow and John Pratt. In order to develop models for dealing with risk in business, economists need precise measurements which can be used in sectors such as investments, bank, insurance and many others.

III.1. Arrow-Pratt Absolute Risk Aversion

If we can specify the link between utility and wealth in a same function, this risk aversion coefficient would measure how much utility an agent gains (or losses) as he gains or losses wealth. To determine this, we would instinctively appeal to the first derivative of the utility function U’(w). However, as utility functions are not unique –we will discuss this in details later, derivative functions are not unique either, and thus it is not possible to compare risk aversion between the utility curves of two different individuals.
Thus, Arrow and Pratt looked at the second derivative of the utility function, which measures how the change in utility itself changes as a function of the wealth level, and divide it by the first derivative to obtain a risk-aversion coefficient.
Arrow-Pratt Absolute Risk Aversion Coefficient = -(U''(w))/(U'(w))
This number shall be positive for risk-averse investors and increase with risk aversion. On the contrary, it will be positive for agents with risk-proclivity (convex utility function, and thus positive second derivative). This coefficient enables comparison between individuals with different utility functions. Thus, for instance, an insurance company can set up a pricing strategy according to the risk aversion and the risk premium of its customers.

Though, this coefficient helps to understand the reaction of an individual according to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    certain risk tolerance and may elect to incur some risk; this is known as a risk…

    • 1608 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The rate of return and risk in return represent the dimensions of expectation and uncertainty. The tradeoffs between them are real and faced by individuals and businesses frequently. The decision to invest involves a choice among alternatives having both varying anticipated return and risk. Being averse to risk, individuals and businesses choose the least risky investment for a given level of anticipated return, or require a greater return when investments are riskier. The investor perspective with respect to risk tends to be one of concern with the degree to which returns might depart (or vary) from the expected level.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fin 419

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If she was a risk-averse, the investments that she would select would be X. The required return increases for an increase risk. The managers of risk-averse require a higher expected return to compensate them for taking greater risk.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    degree students (Martin, et al., 2003), and risk taking propensity studies (Masters et al. 1989)…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ✓ Investors’ expected utility is an increasing function of return and a decreasing function of risk (risk-aversion)…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Within any investment there is a certain amount of risk, which must be taken into account by an investor when deciding to invest. Risk is defined as the chance of financial loss or, more formally the variability of returns associated with a given asset. (Gitman, et al., 2011, p. 208) This concept in finance is the idea that all investment carries a risk, the higher the risk, the greater the return, however the adverse is also relevant, when the risk of an investment is lower the return is expected to also be lower. However, with all investment there is never a guarantee of return.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mean Variance Optimization

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1. All investors are risk averse; they prefer less risk to more for the same level of expected return.…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prospect Theory

    • 11281 Words
    • 46 Pages

    This paper presents a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive model of decision making under risk, and develops an alternative model, called prospect theory. Choices among risky prospects exhibit several pervasive effects that are inconsistent with the basic tenets of utility theory. In particular, people underweight outcomes that are merely probable in comparison with outcomes that are obtained with certainty. This tendency, called the certainty effect, contributes to risk aversion in choices involving sure gains and to risk seeking in choices involving sure losses. In addition, people generally discard…

    • 11281 Words
    • 46 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Basics of Economics

    • 2786 Words
    • 12 Pages

    So basically, trying to maximize your utility means spending more risks, so in the end or future, it’s better for us. However, life is always a roller coaster; it has ups and downs, just like the future of your utility. There’s always a trade-off. You either risk it now or gain utilities after, or you use your utility now, and face the consequence later. If you harass your boss out of anger, you may feel relieved for a while but a couple of months later; you may see yourself in jail. If you save up money to buy the latest technology instead of purchasing the golf clubs you wanted,…

    • 2786 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Risks must be weighted, or in other words the risks being taken must be “calculated…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Boom and Bust

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many empirical studies have found evidence of loss aversion (e.g. Kahneman et al. 1990; Tversky and Kahneman 1991; Barberis et al. 2001).…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    6. (HARA) The hyperbolic absolute risk aversion function is given by: U(x) = y 1-)'…

    • 9797 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abstract The state-preference framework for modeling choice under uncertainty, in which objects of choice are allocations of wealth or commodities across states of the world, is a natural one for modeling “smooth” ambiguity-averse preferences. It does not require reference to objective probabilities, personalistic consequences, or counterfactual acts, and it allows for state-dependence of utility and unobservable background risk. The decision maker’s local beliefs are encoded in her risk neutral probabilities (her relative marginal rates of substitution between states) and her local risk preferences are encoded in the matrix of derivatives of the risk neutral probabilities. This matrix plays a central but generally unappreciated role in the modeling of risk attitudes in the state-preference framework. It can be computed by inverting a bordered Slutsky matrix and vice versa, it generalizes the Arrow-Pratt measure for approximating local risk premia, and its structure reveals whether the decision maker’s risk preferences are ambiguity-averse as well as risk averse. Two versions of the smooth-ambiguity model are analyzed—the source-dependent risk aversion model and the second-order uncertainty (KMM) model—and it is shown that in both cases the overall premium for local uncertainty can be decomposed as the sum of a risk premium and an ambiguity premium.…

    • 15332 Words
    • 62 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination.…

    • 14012 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hakansson, N. H. (1969) “Optimal Investment and Consumption Strategies Under Risk, An Uncertain Lifetime, and Insurance”, International Economic Review, Vol. 10; pp 443-466.…

    • 7914 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics