The Argument Against Henrietta Lacks

Unlike something ever seen before, Henrietta’s cells were placed into a petri dish to see if they would grow, and they did. As a matter of fact they have yet to stop growing. Some would call it a medical miracle, and those that discovered it “Heroes of Modern Medicine”. Many would argue that scientists had the right to take Henrietta’s samples, after all Henrietta signed “a form”. Many would justify the doctor's actions and overlook misconduct or abuse of power as they neglected to inform Henrietta of their intentions in the name of medicine advancement. Yet, some would disagree. Henrietta was being treated for cancer, the form she signed was consent for treatment not for the removal and testing of her cells. The document clearly outlined its purpose, giving John Hopkins Hospital and staff permission to…”Perform any operative procedure, under anaesthetic either local or general that they may deem necessary in the proper surgical care and treatment of: Henrietta Lacks” (31).
Times were different then. Segregation existed, there was no equality in treatment of patients. Henrietta was not treated well. As a cause and effect of things done then, ethical policies and protocols have been set into place. All people are to be treated as equals. Service could not be denied to anyone regardless of gender, ethnicity or religion. Full informed consent and confidentiality paperwork is needed when treating a patient and participating in any research study. Confidentially forms are to protect the patient and the exposure of any outcome of research, only if the patient is willing to disclose will it be allowed. Doctors are to completely explain the procedures and any possible side effects and repercussions from the treatment. Hospital are to put the comfort and needs of the patient first and they have a right to appoint an advocate if needed. Medicine and research have come a long way in 66