Preview

The Anti-Democratic Faces Of Socrates Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
996 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Anti-Democratic Faces Of Socrates Analysis
The Anti-Democratic Faces of Socrates
Socrates is among an elite class of extraordinary human beings. Whether it is religion, politics or socioeconomic issues, Socrates' philosophy had a profound impact on Athenian civilization. His thoughts and ideas have sparked many debates and examinations of the way we live our lives even today. In the three dialogues Defence of Socrates, Euthyphro, and Crito, written by the philosopher Plato, one can find evidence that Socrates was not an enthusiast for democracy. The following will consider this evidence as a means for showing the anti-democratic faces of Socrates.
In Euthyphro, Socrates questions Euthyphro's prosecution of his father for murder. Their dialogue is a result of Socrates attempt to understand what is good and righteous. Socrates does not put much value in the ability of the people to judge the character of a person because his perception is that the people are easily swayed. "Athenians don't much care, it seems to me, if they think someone clever, so long as he's not imparting his wisdom to others; but once they think
…show more content…
"The fact is that there is no person on earth whose life will be spared by you or by any other majority, if he is genuinely opposed to many injustices and unlawful acts, and tries to prevent their occurrence in our city. Rather, anyone who truly fights for what is just, if he is going to survive for even a short time, must act in a private capacity rather than a public one." His statement indicates that in a democratic society the majority vote can be unjust. This statement is further supported in his testimony to the occasion when the commission wanted a collective trial for ten generals who failed to do their job in a battle. Socrates was opposed to the illegality of the circumstances; however, he was out

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pericles, being the man of approved “wisdom and eminent reputation,” was chosen by the state to administer an appropriate eulogy. He begins his Oration by commending all those who contributed their lives to defending the Athenian Empire. Quickly after his appraisal, Pericles transitions into glorifying the democratic institutions in which Athens was founded upon. “And if our more remote ancestors deserve praise, much more do our own fathers, who added to their inheritance the empire which we now possess, and spared no to be able to leave their acquisitions to us of the present generation.” (2.36, PG. 112) Pericles continues by describing how democracy not only exhibits freedom in government, but also in ordinary life, which in turn allowed the public to pursue means of…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Democracy provides the most just and efficient form of political rule” Asses whether Plato has shown his claim to be false.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the ancient Athenian society, the idea of a democracy was very alive and pulsating throughout every corner of the city-state. There were many who agreed with and valued the ideas of a democratic government and thought that it helped Athens thrive however, there were many individuals who disagreed with the ideas of democracy. Throughout Aristophanes’ Lysistrata and Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” and the Crito, many different ideas of free speech surfaced and soon these different texts became very important artifacts relating to free speech. Although Aristophanes and Plato both value free speech within a democratic society, they both propose different arguments in support of its exercise both having different things to say.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Euthyphro Essay

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the selection Euthyphro by Plato, Socrates and Euthyphro are having an argument about what the real meaning of being pious and impious is. While standing on the porch of the King Archon, Euthyphro questions Socrates on his reason for being at the court being that he was sure that Socrates wouldn’t be prosecuting anyone and that it was more than likely the other way around. Socrates informs him that a guy by the name of Meletus was charging him with the crime of corrupting the minds of the youth with his poetry and second guessing of the gods. Socrates then questions Euthyphro on him being at the court and Euthyphro informs him that he is there to prosecute his father for the murder of their servant. Socrates, as anyone would be was taken back by the thought of someone prosecuting their father. Euthyphro let him know that he was a firm believer in piety even if that meant prosecuting his own flesh and blood because to the gods relation doesn’t matter when it comes down to right and wrong.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phi Euthyphro

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While both men were waiting on the porch of the King Archon for their individual trials, Socrates and Euthyphro discuss the concept of holiness. The trials of these two men hold that of different merit, Socrates is being charged for corrupting the youth of Athens by sharing with them some of this ideals. While Euthyphro is going to trial not because he has done anything wrong but because he is accusing his father of murder for allowing a…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro Vs Plato

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates’s initial intension was to tap from the repertoire of the assumed and over – estimated knowledge of Euthyphro, as part of his defense. The dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro was based on the role of the deities and justice in the man’s actions as Euthyphro presented himself as man of great religious knowledge. Euthyphro, also referred to as learned, soothsayer and diviner, postulated his belief that the relationship between man and the deities was more of a commercial beneficial relationship.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro takes place at the marketplace. Euthyphro is on his way to charge his father for murder, and Socrates is going to his own trial, because he was accused of corrupting the minds of the youth. Before going into his trial, Socrates asks Euthyphro, who claims to be a spiritually enlightened prophet, what exactly makes something of piety or impiety. He asks this, because he wants to be seen as Euthyphro’s student, and so that he can use Euthyphro’s teachings in order to understand the difference between godliness and ungodliness, so that he can represent himself in court. As Euthyphro attempts to define it in clear and general terms, Socrates brings up different flaws and perspectives on his explanations that cause him to delve into it. As they continue to discuss it, Socrates’ questions cause Euthyphro to come full circle back to his first explanation of it, and they never come to a clear conclusion.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was put on trial because he was charged with crimes. The first was “corrupting the youth.” (43) The second was “refusing to acknowledge the gods acknowledged by the city.” (43) The third count was “introducing new divinities.” (43) The reason Socrates was put on trial was because he was going around challenging men about their knowledge and wisdom. He was told by an Oracle that he was the wisest man who lived, but he was skeptical about it, so he went and tested out that theory. He went around questioning men, usually different groups such as politicians or rich men who thought they knew everything about the world. However Socrates always showed them up and they got so angry they decided to take him to trial, for what they call “corrupting…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He must do this regardless of the opinion of the majority or possible consequences for himself; he must act only in accordance to the opinion of the few wise, knowledgeable men who understand what is justice, and the laws of the State. Unfortunately, in all of the dialogues the author of this essay has read5, Socrates never clearly explains what ‘the laws’ really are — they remain a sort of abstraction, a divine essence of justice. However, this does not invalidate our definition of a champion of…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Post-Tyrany Socrates

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As Socrates is being attacked for introducing new ideas and creating a new deity, an underlying problem exists within the structure of the state. According to Socrates the current government has grown too large and is, “a great and noble steed who is tardy in his motions owing to his very size, and requires to be stirred into life.” (Apology, 30e) Following success against the tyrants the state has grown too full of itself. They have closed themselves to the possibility that someone outside of their ranks could have ideas of greater value than their own. The human vice of lazy comfortableness, which Socrates attempts to disturb in the Athenian society, is a direct result of a state government who is satisfied to remain powerful in a worldly sense. Socrates pushes the government to evolve into a better state by getting people to look more introspectively and disregard the importance traditionally put on things like social status, money, and property. During this time in Athenian society when the leaders of the state were more closed to the idea of philosophical thinking and introspection of human nature the society was less stable. The structure with which the society governed itself was weakened by its resistance to the concept of living an examined…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The source of Socrates’ suspicion of democracy stems from the argument that by virtue of the law being established through majority rule the best orators can persuade the majority, over experts, through the use of rhetoric, which is void from knowledge and therefore void from the truth. Socrates stresses that the general public is more likely to be convinced through pandering from the most skilled rhetoricians who pander rather than by expert testimony that is based on reason and logic. Socrates states this assertion in his dialogue with Gorgias (459b) and argues that because the…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Unjust Analysis

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates, one of the greatest minds go Ancient Greece’s was no exception. As a sophist, Socrates was considered a teacher of the noble. Sophist of Greed taught young men ’arete’: excellence or virtue for a price. However, Socrates wasn’t a regular sophist, he never accepted any monetary reward for his ’teachings“ (b316,p813) and he never actually taught anything but rather trained minds to think. Socrates states at the trail that he doesn’t have any true knowledge and he believed that in order to have any true knowledge one must be able to produce a single, clear definition of a subject without any exclusions to the rule, something that he was never able believed that he couldn’t do.Rather than use he own opinions to teach his pupils what to think, Socrates used ”systematic questioning“ (b136p813) to help clear their own minds and reach their own conclusions just by thinking. A skill that they could carry forward, into their lives as Athenian citizens. With this in mind, it is nearly impossible for the Athenians government to find Socrates guilty of…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not want to vote for you. I do not want you to vote for me. Now, it seems, that if a mere thirty votes had been cast differently, I'd been acquitted." The way Socrates claims his innocence is that he adheres to the law of Athens by pointing to himself a reward rather than a punishment. He prophesies to those who condemned him that they will be punished, and they will have a significant number of sensors whom he contains, who will be all the more severe because they are younger. He tells them that by killing people not to blame their bad lives, it is not an honest way to get rid of censors. It is better to strive to be more…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The source of Socrates’ suspicion of the democracy stems from the argument that the general public is ignorant and therefore lacks the knowledge or truth to make the best decision for government. The foundation of democracy is based on majority rule, however because the majority is unaware of what truly is good for them, by virtue of their ignorance, the masses are not capable of electing a leader fit to run the state or government. Socrates contends that due to mass ignorance, the majority will vote in favor of what is more pursuable rather than what is logical (459b). Therefore, the consequence of democracy is inherent corruption in the governing structure due to ignorance.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics