Preview

The American Revolution Or War For Independence?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1513 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The American Revolution Or War For Independence?
American Revolution or War for Independence? The United states gaining Independence against Britain is one of the most important events in American history. What many people call a revolution, others just call a war on independence. This an argument many have today when comparing the American war to other revolutions for example; The French Revolution and the Haitian Revolution. When analyzing whether it is a revolution it is important to form a definition of what exactly makes a war a revolution and what makes it just a war of independence. A revolution is when there is an uprising of citizens for a radical change in government and in social class structure. A war for independence is just a separation from a mother country to create a new …show more content…
There was no real central government formed and the laws for Democracy had not been set. One of the main concerns for the new nation was paying back debt. Soon states began to print their own money to start paying debt back, this in turn was bad for the upper class. This was bad for them because soon lower classes were accumulating more and more money, giving the elites less power. This crisis for the elites led to the constitutional convention. The first convention the Constitution was written and sent to all states for approval. The states rejected because it took away too much of democracy. So, for a compromise the Bill of rights was added to protect individual liberties, except for slaves. The rest of the Constitution protected the rights of the rich and elite from protection of property and several other reforms. Already from the Constitution America is starting to fall back to the monarchy ways, by allowing the rich to write law and protect their rights over the lower class. States were no longer allowed to print their own money and had to stick to the contracts created by the central government. This takes away from states total democracy and gives them less freedom which in turn gives the people less freedoms and rights. Soon after another conflict emerged about the United States future which was the Jeffersonian Vision versus the Hamiltonian vision. Also known as the anti-federalist vies and the …show more content…
Before the war with Britain the monarchy was at the top of the social classes and slaves were still at the bottom. After the war only one thing changed in the social classes and that was the monarchy was taken out and America became an independent country. There is no radical change or mix up of the social classes and they remain very rigid. There was no change in slavery social class although there was a start to new ideologies for the slaves for the fight of freedom very little was done for them in the war. Berlin quotes Tom Paine in "'How can Americans complain so loudly of attempts to enslave them, while they hold many hundreds in slavery?"" (Berlin 100). This is important to quote too point out because it shows that America was not looking to change their social classes in their fight for independence and instead looked to keep social class just separate. This is not a radical enough change in the social class to be considered a revolution. When comparing the American war with the French Revolution. In the French Revolution the lowest class revolts against the rich elites to bring a new form of government and social class. This is a complete radical change in the French society. The American fight for independence sparked ideas for slaves all over Berlin even states "No place was touched more deeply

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the year of 1787, delegates met in Philadelphia to write the Constitution. Tyranny, a type of government with an absolute ruler was a fear. They were currently under the ARticles of COnfederation. There was a problem with this though. In the background essay, it states that “there was no chief executive, there was no court system, there was not even a way for a central government to force a state to pay taxes.”. They were in much need of a new Constitution if they were going to be an independent nation. The hard part was making the new government tyranny free. Eventually in 1787 the new Constitution is created.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When fifty-five delegates from eleven of the thirteen states met in Philadelphia in May of 1787 (four years after the Revolutionary War) for a Constitutional Convention, one of their biggest concerns was to establish a government that did not create any kind of tyranny. Tyranny is the abuse of power by one supreme ruler, like a dictator or king. Tyranny can also happen if a few people (such as several generals or religious leaders) seize control of something or if the majority denies a minority’s rights. The abuse of power can lead to the destruction of a whole country. For this reason, the Framers of the Constitution decided to create a new constitution to replace the existing Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles, there was no court system, no chief executive, and not even a way for the government to force a state to pay taxes, which made the government weak. The new constitution needed to be strong so that it could hold our nation together, and yet limit the authority of individual groups to prevent tyranny from happening. The framers decided to use the Constitution to guard against tyranny with four methods. These methods were giving states a more equal representation in Congress, Federalism, separation of powers, and checks and balances.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rebecca Kvamso Total views: 10 (Your views: 3) Sunday, March 3, 2013 8:16:22 PM CST Edited Date Sunday, March 3, 2013 8:16:22 PM CST The Articles of the Confederation was the first written constitution it was drafted by congress in 1777 and ratified four years later. There was just one house of congress. Each state was given one vote regardless of size, population, or wealth. Declaring war, foreign affairs and making treaties with other governments was the only specified powers of the affairs and making treaties with other governments was the only specified powers of the new government. The Articles was not so much a guideline for government but more like a peace treaty and unity pact among the states. The states wanted to be seen and respected as a nation but able to conduct themselves within that nation as independent, separate entities. There were no tax laws or regulations on import/ export taxes. No formula to pay national debt. States were supposed to just contribute as they seen fit. This seems to be a recipe for chaos. To amend the Articles took unanimous consent. entities. There were no tax laws or regulations on import/ export taxes. No formula to pay national debt. States were supposed to just contribute as they seen fit. This seems to be a recipe for chaos. To amend the Articles took unanimous consent Without regulation or a way to enforce it, the economy was going downhill fast. Many believed anarchy would soon result without a stronger unified government. Andrew Hamilton insisted a genuine liberty required “a proper degree of authority to make and Hamilton insisted a genuine liberty required “a proper degree of authority to make and exercise the laws.” In 1787 the decision was made to not to amend the Articles of Confederation, but instead to draft a new constitution Only 4000 words The Constitution of the United States outlines two basic principles division of powers and a system of checks and balances. The constitution is the outline for a three…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ ratify

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787 yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Some members of congress believed that the Articles of confederation needed to be changed meanwhile others disagreed. After the revolutionary war the people needed a sense of power which they received when the new government was centered on the state. The new United States needed a strong central government but many feared of a central government with too much power. This called for a new constitution which caused great conflict between the Federalists and Anti-Federalist.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us Constitution Dbq Essay

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States Constitution, the first constitution of its kind, was ratified on September 17, 1787, at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. The Constitution gave Congress the power to tax and raise an army. The American federal government was established, and certain citizens’ rights were guaranteed, but implications within the document itself garnered hefty resistance. People claimed the Constitution would frame a successful government that the Articles of Confederation failed to do, but others said that the centralization of a federal government would provide an opportunity for it to use its powers immorally. Without a government, the nation might retreat to anarchy, but with a government, the rights of the people might be…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who desired change in government were called Federalists. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and Ben Franklin were all a part of the Federalists. The Federalists believed that the economy was in turmoil because of the Articles (Doc 1). Under the Articles each state had its own currency which created a problem for interstate trade. Another issue that the Federalists had was that the rich were not making money. On August 1, 1786, George Washington wrote a letter addressed to John Jay stating that they “have errors to correct”. In saying this Washington agrees in the fact that the Articles needed to be revised. The Federalists believed that the government trusted the people with too many rights. The states were allowed to refuse the Federal government whenever they chose. The new country that was trying to establish themselves, weren’t united, but instead “thirteen sovereign, independent, disunited States” (Doc 3). The central government didn’t have enough power under the Articles. The Federalists believed that even though they didn’t want to be ruled again like they were under England’s rule, that it was necessary to have a strong central government.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Constitutional Convention, James Madison and his fellow delegates were trying to write a new document known as the Constitution, which would change the way the government would run for the future years of the nation. There were fifty-five white male individuals that joined the call for a Constitutional Convention in the town of Philadelphia in May of 1787. While gathered, the members found multiple problems with their current constitution, known as the Articles of Confederation. These problems included not having a chief executive, a court system, and the central government was very weak and limited. The members agreed to create a new constitution, to make the central government stronger, but try not to create a tyranny, like the harsh power of King George III.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America have a federal constitution, where the President of the United States, Congress, and the judiciary share powers, and the federal government shares sovereignty with the state governments. This is the stark opposite to the unitary system in the UK where sovereignty lies in parliament and some powers are given to local assemblies. There are many types of federalism; all have been a dominant influence in the American political system at some point due to the style of leadership brought in by each new presidential candidate. Throughout U.S. history, the division of power between the federal government and state governments has been the subject of continuous political interest. After suffering from the British government's tyrannical ideologies that led to the American Revolution (1775), many Americans were conditioned to distrust centralized governmental powers. As a result, when Congress drew up the Articles of Confederation in 1781, the new central government was assigned very few powers. The central government had little authority over taxation, court systems and commerce. The states were essentially politically independent governments, each free to regulate commerce in whatever ever way they wanted, make money, and have their state courts hold judgment over national laws mostly entrenched in the US constitution. In 1787 a Constitutional Convention was called to restructure the government and create a national economy. This convention was called as many Americans realized after the American Revolution, that such an unorganized governmental structure entirely based on state powers would hold back political and economic growth of America as a country. Debates were rife between federalists, those supporting a strong central government as proposed in a Virginia plan, and anti-federalists supporting continued strong state…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The American Revolution had a very big impact on the lives of millions at the time and history. It was a separation of the original 13 colonies from the British Empire. After years of the colonies trying to gain representatives in Parliament, they had enough. However the Revolution was not started because of one single thing that bothered the colonists. It was more like dominos which made one thing lead to another. The Colonists were able to defeat the British despite many disadvantages, due to the assistance from the French, better knowledge of the land and their determination of the soldiers.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the new Constitution was drafted, the ratification, the official approval by the people of the United States, sparked a national debate. People were shocked by the radical changes it proposed; they expected the convention to merely amend the Articles of Confederation. They were afraid of regressing back into a state under tyranny, a form of rule where a single or small group reigns with vast or absolute power. Americans had just fought for their freedom from the tyrannical rule of the king of England. All their efforts and revolutionary ideas would have gone to waste.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bill of Rights was ratified on December 25 of 1791. Federalism wanted some kind of centralized government and the anti-federalists were willing of a centralized government only if a bill of rights were to be adopted which secured their rights and gave limits on government power. Alexander did not agree with the BOR because he believed that people were going to take advantage of those rights not included in the BOR. James Madison proposed 12 amendments but 2 were dismissed and 10 were ratified. After the Declarations of Independence was ratified congress decided to build a Constitution a factor that influenced that decision was shays rebellion which were the farmers who didn't want to pay there debt making and made riots. Congress believed they needed to strengthen the government therefore the Constitution was created as well as the Bill of Rights which was enacted to protect against giving the central gov too much power and limiting the power of the federal government of the U.S and protected the rights of all citizens. The final form of the constitution was…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following the success of the colonists in the American Revolution and gaining their independence from Great Britain, the colonists achieved what they most certainly sought after—to separate from Britain and never again experience the horrific tyrannical ways of King George III. This is because the colonists feared tyranny and believed that having the power vested in one ruler is not such a good form of government. Thus, the Framers formed their first ever constitution—the Articles of Confederation. However, the Articles proved to be very weak because it did not have a strong central government. It did not have a tax base, a judiciary, and executive branch. In order to fix the problems under the Articles, specifically the dilemma regarding representation, taxation, and slavery issue within the states, the Constitutional Convention took place. These disputes did not only create a problem but they also caused a division between the states. The colonists did not know how great and substantial the issue with representation, taxation, and slavery would affect them, but as they came together and attempted to resolve the problem, they brought forth compromises that would have a lasting influence in the United States.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Constitution did not protect the basic human rights that were the goal of the Revolution. It was necessary that the Constitution protected the people from tyranny. The document also provided a system of government that was too closely related to that of Great Britain. The President held too much power just like the King of England. America was becoming their own nightmare. No one man should have enough power to take away an individuals God given rights, and control everything and everyone. The Constitution was on a path of creating a tyrannical monarchy in America, just like in England. The government had all the tendencies to centralize just like a monarchy, which is exactly what the convention was trying to end. The Constitution lacked the security of rights, had the makings of an overly centralized government that could lead to tyranny and it had a major resemblance of aristocracy. Without rights, people are subject to become nothing more then a piece in a monarch’s game. Under the Constitution, the president could have suppressed people’s rights, as they were not…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As a new generation take into place, new outcomes need to be face and the world need to be prepare with new rules, but this change depends upon you, the society, to become possible. The Constitutional Convention was created to fix the problems that was facing the Articles of Confederation were the thirteen states became a confederation with a weak central government that gave some of their powers to the national government. Delegates, people who represented what the society wants, decided to not only helped with the Articles of Confederation, but also propose a new American government. During the Constitutional Convention, delegates also discussed how much power should be giving to the people, national versus state government, big states versus…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, there was a need for strong state centered governments, rather than a strong central government based on their experience as a colony. However, an investigation of the historical record reveals that the Articles of Confederation were not meeting the needs of Americans, and the need for a new Constitution was desired. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays