In era of globalization now, all the building must be sustain and adapt with suitable condition at particular place, community and time. The adaptive reuse of pre-war building should have minimal impact on the heritage significant of the pre-war building and it setting. Developers should gain an understanding of why the building has heritage status and then pursue development that is sympathetic to the building to give it a new purpose. Adaptive reuse is self-defeating if it fails to protect the building" heritage value. To prolong the period of long lasting from damage for a building by retaining all or most of the structure system and as much as possible of other elements, such as cladding, glass and interior partitions.
Adaptive reuse means by use back for latest communities to reach the environmental sustainability. To decrease, reuse and recycle waste as aiming and from bottles and boxes to clothes, vehicles and buildings we find new life. The more exactly means by adaptive reused is changes process from ineffective and not applied anymore into a new things that can be used by user by different purpose and aim.
Nowadays, the majority of the pre-war building has been reused and adoption into new functions. As example churches, government buildings and agriculture building as industrial type building has been translate to be used by nowadays need but the architectural of the building still preserved from destroyed (Cantacuzino, 1989).
When the adaptive reused process of the pre-war building, the effect of the heritage value on the building must be minimized. The developer must understand why the building has a title as historic and heritage and they also should know why the buildings significant must be maintained and not be changing at all. It’s very self-defeating if the building’s heritage value cannot be protected and the adaptive reused fails. They also must
References: Retrieved on November 18, 2012 from: http://www.environment.gov.au/heritage/publications/protecting/pubs/adaptive reuse.pdf 2 4. Henehan, D. & Woodson, R. D. (2004). Building change-of-use: renovating, adapting, and altering commercial, institutional, and industrial properties. New York: McGraw-Hill. 5. Hilde T. Remøy, Sara J. Wilkinson, (2012),"Office building conversion and sustainable adaptation: acomparative study", Property Management, 6 7. Kincaid, D. (2002). Adapting buildings for changing uses. Guidelines for change of use refurbishment. London: Spon Press 8 9. Langston, C., Wong, F. K. W., Hui, E. C. M., & Shen, L. (2008). “Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong.” Building and Environment. 10. Ligibel, T (2011) Introduction To Historic Preservation, Fall 2011 11 12. Majlis Bandaraya Melaka Bersejarah, Jabatan Kawalan Bangunan. Retrieved on Disember 26, 2012 from http://www.mbmb.gov.my/jbtkawalanbangunan 13 14. Malvika, B. (2000). “Adaptive Reuse of Historic Architecture: The Case of Institutional Buildings” 15 16. Masran, S. (1983). "Pemeliharaan , pengekalan , pemulihan dan pengawetan bangunan-bangunan bersejarah di Kuala Lumpur" Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying. 17. Peter A. Bullen, Peter E.D. Love, (2011) "Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings", Structural Survey 18 19. Ramli, S.F. (2011). Adaptive Reuse of Historical Buildings. Retrieved November 18, 2012 from Heritage Malaysia website: http://heritagemalaysia.blogspot.com/2012/05/adaptive-reuse-of-historical-buildings.html " 20 21. Richard L. Austin, David G. Woodcock, W. Cecil Steward, R. Alan Forrester.(1988). “Adaptive Reuse: Issues and Case Studies in Building Preservation” 22