With technology rife in today’s society are the boundaries between spoken and written language becoming ever nearer? It seems that young children, teenagers, adults and even the elderly are all turning to mobile devices as an aid of communication. The frequent use of texting has brought about new features, such as clipping, that are unique to the texting world, this is thought to be putting a strain on our abilities to use correct Standard English. In this essay I will explore the variety of language and text specific features used within text messaging. I will also analyse the various attitudes towards texting and finally give my own opinion.…
Part 4: How does context change the way we text? Do we text different people in different ways? Talk about features of text language – does the use of a feature depend on the audience and purpose of the message? Do you feel that you adapt your way of texting for specific purposes?…
SMS (or text messaging) is very popular. A study by OFCOM (who work in the UK communications industry) have found that in the UK in 2014 around 150 billion text messages were sent that year. Users are from all age groups, however it is most common in the 14-20 year old age category. On the apps you can use emoji’s to make it easier to express emotions and make it more like a face to face conversation. However messaging is causing a huge debate; some people love it but some loathe it. An article written by John Humphrey in the Daily mail called ‘I h8 txt msgs: How texting is wrecking our language’. However Graeme Patton form the Telegraph newspaper took a different view; his article was Text messaging 'improves children's spelling skills'…
Crystal think that popular conceptions about the effect of texting on the English language are wrong because all the abbreviation, using initial letters for whole word is not at all new. It has been in our language over hundreds of years. For example IOU is known from 1618. Crystal stated that the only thing that change was the medium communication; from letter to mobile phone or computer. Crystal feel like texting is a human ability to be creative with language and to adapt language to suit the demand of diverse setting. It is an evolution as he describes it. In his conclusion, Crystal says, “In texting what we are seeing, in a small way, is language in evolution” meaning that how we are using texting is an progress of language because in order to use abbreviation and so forth we must first understand how the word sound and use.…
First, Cullington notes common arguments of the negative impact of texting. For instance, the one about students the usage of too many abbreviations.Sometimes those abbreviations are discovered in students' formal writing. Consisting of “cuz”, an abbreviation normally used for because. Another…
In chapter fifteen ''2b or Not 2b?'' of ''They Say / I Say'', David Crystal provides arguments in favour of text messaging. Crystal tries to prove his point that text messaging is not destroying the English language with great research, a lot of examples and a clear organization. As the author himself puts it, ''Texting has added a new dimension to language use, but it's long-term impact is negligible. It's not a disaster. ''. Although some people believe text messaging is pillaging our punctuation, savaging our sentences and raping our vocabulary, Crystal insist that. In sum, then, his view is that the abbreviations were used as a natural, intuitive response to a technological problem, but that they are also more than just time and energy saving act. He considers some texts also as linguistically quite complex.…
Text messaging is the central structure of communication for teennagers. While teens may think shortcuts are helpful they may not understand the damage they are doing to their writing. While older generations consider it to be degrading to the English Language, over half of teens have come to the conclusion that texting has made their writing inapplicable. Although to some teens, shortcuts and proper English can still be effective. Researchers show that text messaging has been proven to have a negative effect on society, and to the English Language.…
What are the some of the effects that texting is having on the teen literacy? Text messaging has increased in popularity ever since the very first text message that was sent in the year of 1933 by a student who was working for the Nokia Corporation (Druoin and Davis 49). Centre of Science Education at Sheffield University discovered that more than ninety percent of the youth have cell phones and ninety-six percent of them use them to text. (Plester, Wood, Bell 137). The establishment of cell phones and texting has made a huge encounter on the way people communicate. Most people use their cell phones to text more than they do to make phone calls. Teenagers have observed that an average teenager sends a hundred textsin a day and 3,033 in s month. (Cingel and Sundar 310). Teens have the highest numbers of sent texts and the number is rapidly going up. Studies have shown that this form of communication is destroying the way people read,…
In the article “Texting, the Next Epidemic” by William B. Bradford, he addresses the issue of texting in our society. He states that texting is starting to tear apart the social fabric of our country. In the article, Bradford states that the United States has fallen behind in educational standards due to the lack of reading and writing involved with texting. He portrays to his readers that texting is making our social events not so social. He says that people go to restaurants and parties for social interaction just end up on their phones not talking to each other. Furthermore, he talks about how texting is creating a generation that is socially awkward and cannot read or write important papers or documents. Proving his point on whether the next generation will be able to govern our country without being able to think, speak, or write clearly.…
In this essay I will be writing about texting and exploring the view that texting can be a very creative form of language use. Firstly the first text was sent by Neil Papworth saying ‘’Merry Christmas’’.This then introduced texting to the world as over 18.5 billion texts are sent each month. So this shows how popular this has become. Also over 68.7 million texts are used globally.62% of people use text to communicate with friends, so this shows that conversations concluded emotion as it’s a very non formal as your talking with your friends.Once again this backs up the way texting can be creative also the text limit is 160 characters so you can say a lot when texting.…
In this weeks video John McWhorter talks about texting. John studies how language has evolved -- and will evolve -- with social, historical and technological developments, in addition to studying and writing about race in America. He argues that we always hear texting is a negative decline or fall in serious literature or writing ability. That texting ruins someone’s ability to write or speak in a grammatically correct way. When In it really doesn’t, language is speech. Speech is much looser, its much more telegropahic. Very different from writing, we tend to see language being written often. That we think that’s what language is.…
In John McWhoter’s article, “Is Texting Killing the English Language?” he examines how texting has incorporated into some people’s vocabulary today in America. Texting has affected not only word choice, but as well as how the words are perceived. For example, McWhoter uses the famous texting acronym “LOL”. “He…
"It's kind of funny because 'LOL' now means 'laugh out loud.' But when I was a kid, we would write 'LOL' on notes and stuff to our friends and it would mean 'Lot's of Love.' Whenever I read that, I still find myself thinking 'Lot's of Love' and then I'm like 'No, Laugh out Loud!' It's kind of funny," said Lane laughing (Lane 2010).…
Today in day’s people doesn’t communicate like we used to before texting were invented. As technology keeps advancing our language do too, most of the people don’t talk no more, people text instead. Back in the days we need it to wait months for letters sent over seas. Some people are happy that we don’t have to do that no more, now just using a Network can be send letters or important messages in 3 seconds. Some people are concerned that our new form of communication is destroying our language. Numerous authors had shared their points of view on the new trend of texting, some accept it, and others criticize it. As a reference John Humphrys, David Crystal and Louis Menand are some of the writers to judge the recent technology. I believe texting is a faster way to communicate, but without abbreviations, not if we’re trying to save the English language…
Text language has evolved rapidly over recent years with trillions of text messages sent each year. Until recently, text messages were relatively expensive to send and so users have developed various techniques to reduce the number of characters per text to ensure they are paying as little as possible. This report will investigate the effects of these devices with text messages as well as trying establish whether there is a link between the way people text and they way they speak. Finally, I will also explore some of the public attitudes to texting.…