Texas Constitution What Is The Difference Between Pros And Cons

The constitution is the fundamental principles of law that the state’s law system is base on. Regardless of where it was created, New Hampshire or Texas, the constitution always went through different processes of drafting, revising, and amending several times over the courses of history to result in the modern constitution as people look at it today. At a glance, there is Texas, a state that is known for its notorious cowboy culture and rebellious history, to be compare to New Hampshire, a quiet little state that locate in the northeast corner of the US. In comparison and contradiction, the two states’ constitution share many similarities in their bills of rights but maintain many differences in their legislature, especially in the meeting cycles. Whether or not Texas should change its constitution in order to ensure the effectiveness of
To be more specific, the second sentence of religious freedom on the New Hampshire constitution does mention that the right to worship can be achieved only if “…he doth not disturb the public peace or disturb others in their religious worship.” (New Hampshire Constitution. Part I. Art. 5). This statement means to say that one individual cannot use their freedom of worship to disturb other individual’s life or his or her freedom of worship. Texas constitution did not state specifically the same idea but it took into account another important element- the equality of religions: “It shall be the duty of the Legislature to pass such laws as may be necessary to protect equally every religious denomination in the peaceable enjoyment of its own mode of public worship.” (Texas Constitution. Art. I, sec. 6). This is one very important element that the New Hampshire constitution does not mention. Texas, in the other hand, put down in text that the government is responsible to protect every religion the same as others by passing such law to ensure that