We, the United States, are the target of terrorism because of the “super power” that as a nation we have worldwide. The United States is considered one of the most powerful nations in the world based on its technological, economical, and industrial developments. The reasons of terrorism range from poverty, repression, and humiliation from other nations to "they hate our values”. We have such a strong and prominent position in the “war on terror” that it has gone to the point that if a terrorist can create fear in America, he can do it anywhere else. However, people such as Phillip Gordon, Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy, believe that there’s only one solution to win the war on terror; he noted- “Victory will come only when Washington succeeds in discrediting the terrorists' ideology and undermining their support.” (1-1). Apparently accepting and dealing with the situation are the main solutions of this “political” issue. Shaul Bakhash writer of "The Riddle of Terrorism" believes that terrorism is a state of mind, a way of thinking based on religious beliefs that create some sort of hate and thirst of revenge against those who have freer minds and different perspectives. While the existence of terrorism is not a new phenomenon, it is still quite complicated for many people to understand and comprehend why so much hate and terror worldwide, primarily against the United States and humankind. Walter Laqueur, author of “The Age of Terrorism”, provides lots of information on the historical and more recent manifestations of terrorism. He affirms how small groups and movements are created based on different religious, political, and economical stands that may not agree with the mentality of others. These different perceptions of “freedom” become a repression against other countries that have a more democratic mentality. The majority of these groups become terrorists as a result of a “political” approach that never succeeds. The following passage summarizes Laqueur’s view and clearly demonstrates his way of thinking regarding this relevant issue: “Terrorism…has been waged by national and religious groups, by the left and by the right, by nationalist as well as internationalist movements, and it has been state-sponsored…. Terrorist movements have frequently consisted of members of the educated middle classes, but there has also been agrarian terrorism, terror by the uprooted and the rejected, and trade union and working-class terror…. Terror has been directed against autocratic regimes as well as democracies; sometimes there has been an obvious link with social dislocation and economic crisis, at other times there has been no such connection. Movements of national liberation and social revolution (or reaction) have turned to terrorism after political action has failed. But elsewhere, and at other times, terrorism has not been the consequence of political failure, but has been chosen by militant groups even before other options were tried.” (45-54) Researches and investigators are constantly looking for the real meaning behind the behavior of these movements, the constant repressions and acts of cruelty where death is the ultimate goal. A lot of these researches have become to the conclusion that terrorists view everything that surrounds them through the lens of their convictions and beliefs, therefore, in their opinions; their actions are absolutely right and natural. Their mentalities and/or way of thinking goes beyond reality and acceptance, it is more an act of loyalty to their religion and a plan of life that they must follow from step one to the last. Based on history and previous attacks not only against the United States but also other nations, the behavior of terrorist shows us and makes us understand that terrorists tend not to identify themselves as killers or enemies. They often call themselves “the fighters for the freedom” or “liberators” to exculpate themselves in front of the outside world. They don’t really...
Cited: December, 2007. 1-1 Web. 12 Sep. 2012 <http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/63009/philiph-gordon/can-the-war-on-terror-be-won>.
Walsh, Kenneth. "The ‘War on Terror’ Is Critical to President George W. Bush’s Legacy”
Please join StudyMode to read the full document