Taxation Without Representation Essay
After the French and Indian war, a huge debt weighed heavily upon Great Britain. In attempt to repay these debts, Britain imposed several Acts that greatly affected the American colonies. Many issues arose from both taxing the colonist and how the colonies were represented in the Parliament. This in turn caused difference of opinion between both the British government and the American colonies. On one hand, the Parliament wanted ultimate control over issues and decisions made. While on the other hand, the Colonist wanted someone speaking up for them on these issues because to them this was inadequately justifiable.
Taxation without representation is what the colonist have considered being done wrong by the British Government. The Colonist believed …show more content…
According to the British, all the members of the Parliament represents all of England’s empire, so the American colonies were represented by what is called “virtual representation.” As we all know, “virtual” means something that is there but not physically present. So the colonies had no one to represent them and this did not work out toward the benefit of the colonist because the members of the Parliament made decisions based on what they felt was justifiable. So the Colonist wanted was “actual representation,” which would require someone from each of the colonies speaking out on the colonist behalf. The one problem with traveling across the Atlantic to meet with the Parliament. Instead, there were Colonial Assemblies held, which were kind of like the Parliament of the colonies, and considered the commonwealths own legislative body. However, this legislative body was still tied to the King and therefore the Colonist wanted their sovereignty. They wanted this because they believed some of the problems in the colonies could be managed and dealt with best by the Colonial Assembly, without the involvement of the Parliament. And this was not like well by the Parliament. The Parliament wanted complete control by having only one authority, which was them and the
Taxation without representation is what the colonist have considered being done wrong by the British Government. The Colonist believed …show more content…
According to the British, all the members of the Parliament represents all of England’s empire, so the American colonies were represented by what is called “virtual representation.” As we all know, “virtual” means something that is there but not physically present. So the colonies had no one to represent them and this did not work out toward the benefit of the colonist because the members of the Parliament made decisions based on what they felt was justifiable. So the Colonist wanted was “actual representation,” which would require someone from each of the colonies speaking out on the colonist behalf. The one problem with traveling across the Atlantic to meet with the Parliament. Instead, there were Colonial Assemblies held, which were kind of like the Parliament of the colonies, and considered the commonwealths own legislative body. However, this legislative body was still tied to the King and therefore the Colonist wanted their sovereignty. They wanted this because they believed some of the problems in the colonies could be managed and dealt with best by the Colonial Assembly, without the involvement of the Parliament. And this was not like well by the Parliament. The Parliament wanted complete control by having only one authority, which was them and the