Preview

Taxation Law Case Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1429 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Taxation Law Case Analysis
CLAW3201 Case Analysis

Introduction
In Crown Insurance Services Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Crown), the issues raised are pertinent to the residence and source of the company under s6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936. As cases are determined on the basis of all relevant facts and circumstances of each case, this analysis will focus on how the court’s decision process determined whether Crown had carried on business in the years 2004-2007 inclusive and the existence of central management and control (CM&C) in Australia. The purpose of this is to assess the valuation of Crown’s taxable income, which ultimately resulted in the objective decision to be set aside in favour of the applicant. Evaluation will be made in regards to how the case compares with previous cases and tax rulings and the likely impacts of the case on future commercial practices. Further, what the case infers about the current state of law in this area will also be discussed, as well as the potential degree of changes in modern judgements of residence and source issues within businesses not incorporated in Australia.

Past judgements and tax rulings
The facts of the case are similar to that of Malayan Shipping Co Ltd v FCT (1946), where the court held that “the mere trading in Australia by a company not incorporated in Australia will not of itself be sufficient to cause the company to become a resident”. This is true and consistent with the statutory definition of resident of Australia, and with the decision made in Crown. This is highlighted in paragraphs 57-58 as it indicates that the case does not result in new law. Moreover, in Tariff Reinsurances Ltd v Commissioner of Taxes (Vic) (1938), the contract was formed in London and the company’s profits were not “earned in or derived in or from Victoria” under s42 of the Victorian Income Tax Act 1928. This judgement is exemplified in the decision of Crown, where payments of claims to member companies were not made in Australia,



Bibliography: Malayan Shipping Co Ltd v FCT (1946) 71 CLR 156; 3 AITR 258 Tariff Reinsurances Ltd v Commissioner of Taxes (Vic) [1938] HCA 21 Dirkis, M. ‘Still a Problem Child: Central Management and Control after RITA’ (2005) Revenue Law Journal, Vol. 15(1), pp. 126-139 Other sources Coleman et al., Australian Tax Analysis – Cases, Commentary, Commercial Applications and Questions, 8th ed, Thomas Reuters, Lawbook Co. 2011

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Cadia Case Analysis

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: Cadia Holdings Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (2010) 242 CLR 195…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Tax Dilemma Assignment

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rita just finished completing her educational requirements to become a dental hygienist. She has been offered jobs in two different cities and is trying to determine which one she should accept. Both employers offer similar benefits and working conditions, but the jobs are in two different states. Rita will move to the state in which she accepts a position.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the case, “FC of T v The Myer Emporium Ltd 87 ATC 4363”, the taxpayer “The Myer Emporium”, worked out a financial arrangement during 6-9 March 1981. Under the arrangement, it lent $80 million to its subsidiary, Myer Finance Ltd, at an interest rate of 12.5% pa. It also assigned its right to the interest (not to the principal) to Citicorp Canberra Pty Ltd for a lump sum in the order of $45 million. The commissioner treated the lump sum of $45 million received as an income receipt, assessable under s 25(1) of ITAA 1936 (Cth). The commissioner also contended that the amount received constituted a profit assessable under the second limb of s 26(a) as a profit arising from a profit-making scheme.1 Both the Victorian Supreme Court and the Full Federal Court decided in favor to Myer despite the fact the taxpayer had argued contrary to the Tax Office!s argument that the lump sum was merely realizing a capital asset because it was a gain from an isolated transaction outside the ordinary course of its retail and property development business. However, the High Court conferred its decision that the $45 million received by the Myer was assessable under s 25(1) as an income receipt and also under the second limb of s 26(a) as a profit from a profit-making under-taking or scheme2. On the facts in Myer, the High Court held that: “It is the fact that Myer!s business at all times was that of retailing and property developer. The income made by…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dispute occurred in Victoria between a registered company, Tallerman & Co Pty Ltd ("the plaintiff") and an incorporated company, Nathan's Merchandise Pty Ltd. ("the defendant), where both parties operated their business. Two previous binding contracts (orders No. 58 and No. M57) were made in communications on 14th May 1951 and 2nd August 1951 respectively, each for the sale by the plaintiff to the defendant of 1,000,000 Hungarian .22 bullets. A consignment of 1,800,000 bullets for the above orders was dispatched from Sydney to the defendant by rail on the 12th February 1952 and was received by a carrier employed by the defendant in Melbourne who stored the bullets in the defendant's warehouse, where they resided for three days. Claiming that under the contractual terms, those bullets should only be delivered when requested, the defendant refused to take the delivery, and thus reconsigned the bullets back to Sydney by rail. On 3rd March 1952 a letter by the plaintiff's solicitor was sent out requiring the defendant to accept the "contractual goods" and that otherwise necessary steps would be taken to enforce the plaintiff's legal rights. On 6th March the defendant's solicitors responded by reasserting the stance that it had been settled from the start that delivery of bullets should be made only when the defendant required them, to fulfill its customers' orders. In addition the defendant's solicitors raised the further point that the location of delivery in Melbourne was inconsistent with the contractual terms.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Federal Commissioner for Taxation v J Walter Thompson Pty Ltd (1944) 69 CLR 227 (at 231)…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taxation Law Assignment 2012

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In this assignment, it is assumed that Emma and Ryma are both tax residents of Australia.…

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bibliography: * Latimer P Australian Business Law, 31st ed, 2012, ¶4-090 Recognised duties of care. P231…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the dissenting judgment made by Callinan J in the landmark New South Wales v Commonwealth (“Workchoices’ Case”), a strong criticism was mounted against constitutional interpretation methods employed in the judicial forum. Explicitly, this conjecture was focused at Isaacs J’s judgement in Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (“Engineers’ Case”), where a textualism approach to constitutional interpretation was adopted. Callinan J expressed the Engineers’ Case as “less than satisfactory”, using “detached language” to discredit its literal methodology of interpreting the constitution. Such a claim is unsubstantiated and will thusly be deconstructed, so that it can clearly be seen that the approach taken in Engineers’ Case was manifestly apt for the purposes of constitutional interpretation.…

    • 4001 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pmsp Unit 1

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Black, D 1998, Federation Issues, Constitution Centre of Western Australia, viewed 15 April 2012, http://www.ccentre.wa.gov.au…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tax Law

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The primary source of US tax law is Congress. Power to initiate tax legislation is vested in the House of Representatives but all tax bills must pass both houses and be signed into law by the President. Many times the details of the legislation are not dictated by Congress, but left to the Treasury Department which adopts regulations (that have the force of law) to spell out the details as well as interpret the statutes and provide guidance on the law. In addition, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issues rulings that address the application of the law to specific fact situations.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Work Choices Case

    • 4012 Words
    • 17 Pages

    McCallum, Ron, ‘The Australian Constitution and the Shaping of Our Federal and State Labour Laws’ (2005) 10 (1) Deakin law Review…

    • 4012 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    This paper examines the development and scope of accessory liability under the second limb of Barnes v Addy as it stands in both England and Australia. As to the law in England, the focus will be on the rearticulation of the principle of accessory liability under the second limb as stated in Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan. In particular, it will consider the extent to which the decision has reconciled inconsistencies in earlier authority and remedied those issues propounded to be inherent in the traditional formulation of the principle. At this stage, this traditional principle remains good law in Australia. However, as suggested in Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd, there is potential for the English approach to be adopted in the Australian context. Such an adoption may be advisable in light of the judicial and extra-judicial commentary suggesting that the orthodox approach is in fact not properly aligned with equitable principles. The discussion of this possibility involves not only an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, but also a determination as to the extent to which the separate application of each approach could result in a divergent outcome.…

    • 3483 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to Advise Allan, Belinda and CareFree Pty Ltd as to the constitutional validity of the Medicinal Cannabis Act 2011 (Cth) (MCA) in terms of whether its provisions apply to them under the trade and commerce power s 51(i) and as to whether the MCEA (Medicinal Cannabis Export Authority) is constitutionally valid in light of the separation of judicial power doctrine. This paper begins by analysing the validity of MCEA. In doing so the paper not only confers to the characterisation of the laws under the trade and commerce powers of s 51(i), but also includes the implied incidental powers and the doctrine of principles of separation of judicial power. There after it advises Allan, Belinda and Carefree Pty Ltd as to the constitutional validity of the MCA. The rational is simply to first understand the constitutional validity of MCEA, as the outcome of the advisory matter inherently depends on it.…

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australian Property Law

    • 63351 Words
    • 254 Pages

    Table of Contents d 5 Torrens Title Lan Introduction 5 Principle of Indefeasibility 5 Key Provisions (RP Act) 5 Deferred v immediate indefeasibility 6 Frazer v Walker 1967 6 Breskvar v Wall (1971) 7 What will attract indefeasibility? 8 Leases: 9 Mercantile Credits Ltd v Shell Co of Australia Ltd (1976) 9 Karacominakis v Big Country Developments (2000) 11 Mortgages: 11 Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Ltd (2007) 11 Volunteers 12 Bogdanovic v Koteff (1988) 12 Rasmussen v Rasmussen [1995] 13 Exceptions to Indefeasibility 14 Fraud Exception: 15 Loke Yew v Port Swettenham Rubber Co Ltd [1913] 15 Assets Co Ltd v Mere Roihi [1905] 16 Schultz v Corwill Properties (1969) 16 Russo v Bendigo Bank Ltd (1993) 17 The In Personam Exception 18 Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) (1988) 18 Mercantile Mutual Life Insurance Co Ltd v Gosper (1991) 20 Vassos v State Bank of South Australia (1993) 20 Special equity cases: 21 Personal equity and breach of trust: 22 Personal Equities and Mistake 23 OTHER EXCEPTIONS; OVERRIDING STATUTES 23 The Register, equitable interests and caveats 26 The Register 26 Bursill Enterprises Pty Ltd v Berger Bros Trading Co Pty Ltd 26 White v Betalli [2007] NSWCA 243 27 Equitable interests and unregistered instruments 27 Barry v Heider (1914) 19…

    • 63351 Words
    • 254 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Melbourne Corporation v Commonwealth (“Melbourne Corporation Case”) (1947) 74 CLR 31 – Cth introduced Banking Act, prohibited private banks conducting business with State unless Cth Treasurer agreed. Cth laws invalid if they ① deny existence or ability of State to govern itself OR ② single out any one State. Implied limitation on the constitution. 2 limbs – discrimination limb (against State govt/entities), guarantee limb (guarantee exists that we are a Federation). Commonwealth cannot legislate so as to curtail the capacity of State government entities.…

    • 10129 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Good Essays