Taking Risks For Science Is Wrong

Have you ever thought about science outside school or work? If so, you might be interested in reading this article. Some people think that taking risks for scientific discoveries are right, while others think it is wrong. I think that it is perfectly fine for people to take risks for scientific discoveries for a lot of reasons. We can help more people, people are willing to take those risks, and everybody takes risks but some take it a little to a greater extent than others. One important reason taking risks for science is not wrong is because the people who do it are willing to do it, and want to. The article titled "Beings Not Made for Space¨ states ¨Regarding radiation, NASA operates under a restriction that astronauts should not have their lifetime cancer risk raised by more than three percentage points, but that is an arbitrary limit.Mark Kelly, for one, said he would be willing to
"War Zone Doctor" says "This past year we treated 2,500 people. And that's a huge number of patients." Jill Seaman, the doctor, has been treating infected in a dangerous country, but thinks she is not a risk taker. I think she is. She is traveling out to dangerous places to help other people. She wants to do it and she is making a huge difference. One last reason is everybody takes risks, some more extreme than others. Some people take more extreme risks for science, and that is perfectly fine. Jill Seaman, from the passage "War Zone Doctor" thinks that she is not taking risks. She states "Everybody's taking risks. Life is a risk. Everybody who lives there, they know that life could be gone in an hour. And yet they live. And they are happy." If everybody is taking risks, then why would you not take risks that are a bit extreme? I know that if people choose to do something good, they should not be denied the privilege to do