Preview

T & J's Negligence Was Caused By T.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
605 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
T & J's Negligence Was Caused By T.
One very important issue in this case and many civil lawsuits is negligence. Negligence is when there is a failure to use reasonable care which results in injury or damage to another. It also asks who is responsible for one’s injury. In this case, Mrs. McKoy claims her injuries were caused by T & J’s negligent behavior. In order to prove negligence, T & J must be guilty of five elements: duty of due care, breach, factual cause, proximate cause, and damages. Duty of due care means that the defendant has a duty to the plaintiff if he or she could have foreseen injury to a particular person. A person at work has an increased duty of care and must act as a reasonable person in his or her profession. In this case, T & J had a duty of due care as they were on the job and could prevent a foreseeable injury, an …show more content…
A breach of duty is when a defendant failed to meet his or her legal obligations, if there is in fact a legal duty of care. Since there is a legal duty of care, the plaintiff did in fact have a breach of duty by not having clean and sterilized nail instruments. They also did not ask about previous diseases or illnesses or gave warning that injury is possible, which is also a part of their duty. Businesses must maintain safe store conditions and provide clean environments that protect their customers from harm. From the plaintiff’s testimony, T & J did not use clean nail instruments, although I could have missed later proof that showed they did in fact use clean nail tools. Factual cause is when the defendant’s conduct actually caused the injury. From what I witnessed, there was no proof of causation that the manicure was the reason for the infection, since nearly three weeks had passed in between the manicure and the hospitalization. There could have been later evidence creating causation, but from my day in court, it appeared that the defendant’s breach of duty did not cause the plaintiff’s harm. Proximate cause is when the type of harm is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Law 531 Case 5.1

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rules: The case was adjudicated on the basis of negligence law. Negligence is “the omission to do something which a reasonable man would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.” Among others, negligence law takes into consideration: duty of care, breach of duty of care, injuries caused by defendant’s negligent act(s), and the likes. (Cheeseman, 2013). A particular negligence law considered during this case was negligence per se.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Duty of Care

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Duty of Care” means providing care and support for individuals within the law and also within the policies, procedures and agreed ways of working of your employer. It is about avoiding abuse and injury to individuals, their friends and family and their property.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Duty of Care” means providing care and support for individuals within the law and also within the policies, procedures and agreed ways of working of . It is about avoiding abuse and injury to individuals, their friends and family and their property.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To determine whether a duty of care has been breached, a judge asks how he or she would have acted in the same circumstances.…

    • 4685 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hsa 515 Law and Health

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first element that a plaintiff must prove is that the defendant owed him or her legal duty of care. Generally, this duty of care is a legal notion that states that people owe anyone around them or anyone who could be around them a duty to not place them in situations of undue risk of harm. Proving this element will largely depend on the facts of the situation. After the plaintiff has proved that a legal duty of care existed, he or she must then prove that this duty was breached. Generally, courts will use the standard of a ‘reasonable person’ when it comes to this question. Specifically, this means that the judge or jury must view the facts of the situation and decide what a reasonable person would have done in a similar situation. If this reasonable person would have acted differently than the defendant, it’s likely that it will be found that the duty was breached. Causation is the most complicated element of negligence. It means that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either directly or indirectly caused the injuries and damages suffered by the plaintiff because of the breach of the duty of care. This element has confused even the most respected legal minds over time, and its proof should not be taken lightly. Last, a plaintiff in a negligence case must prove a legally recognized harm, usually in the form of physical injury to a person or to property. It is not enough that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The failure to exercise reasonable care must result in actual damages to a person to whom the defendant owed a duty of care (FindLaw 2012). These damages can be actual costs such as medical expenses and lost income or intangible costs such as pain and suffering or loss of companionship.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scenario: As pedestrians exited at the close of an arts and crafts show, Jason Davis, an employee of the show’s producer, stood near the exit. Suddenly and without warning, Davis turned around and collided with Yvonne Esposito, an 80-year-old woman. Esposito was knocked to the ground, fracturing her hip. After hip replacement surgery, she was left with a permanent physical impairment. Esposito filed suit in a federal district court against Davis and others, alleging negligence.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ct235 Duty of Care

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1.1 “Duty of Care” means providing care and support for individuals within the law and also within the policies, procedures and agreed ways of working of your employer. It is about avoiding abuse and injury to individuals, their friends and family and their property.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Duty of care is the obligation to exercise a level of care towards an individual, as is reasonable in all the circumstances, to avoid injury to that individual or his property.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CYPW Unit 54

    • 465 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Duty of care means exercising a reasonable degree of attention and caution to avoid negligence which would lead to harm to other people.…

    • 465 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Care Policy

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The second element, breach of duty, is the failure to conform to or the departure from a required duty of care owed to a person. Once a duty of care has been created, the plaintiff must exhibit that the defendant breached that duty by failing to comply with the required accepted standard of care. Evidence of a breach of duty typically can be offered through expert testimony or res ipsa loquitur (“the thing speaks for itself”).…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Case Study

    • 2752 Words
    • 12 Pages

    As, for the first time, demonstrated in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson , negligence may exist despite there being no direct relationship between two parties. After the Shaddock’s Case , the duty of care was extended to include the giving of information. In general, defendant will owe the plaintiff a duty of care if, at the time of making the statement, the defendant knows that:…

    • 2752 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence and Points

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. According to the case, why was this not a case of negligent infliction of emotional distress, and what tort did the court approve? (5 points)…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A duty of care is a legal obligation imposed on an individual requiring that they adhere to a standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could foreseeable harm others. A definition from Wikipedia…

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Factual Causation: having been proven in court of causing harm and discomfort to a person or property…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be guilty of negligence, a defendant in a lawsuit must breach that duty of care, and the breach of duty must be the cause of harm to the plaintiff.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays