The Syrian Civilian Conflicts
The Syrian conflicts have been occurring since the 15th of March 2011, as a secular revolt against autocracy. It turned out to be more than just a conflict that would be resolved with war. Some claiming it started of with only peaceful demonstrations then it evolved in to a continuous matter of disasters. While others claimed that they were more than just ‘peaceful demonstrations’. Obviously each discourse has their reasons for believing the truth they want to believe. Yet, what really is the truth? How can we know who is truthful and who is not? Was the media exaggerating? All these questions and more are doubts we all have when we see the news. Especially when it comes to news from the Middle East. It is hard for others to know the truth since we only see what the media tends to show us. Who is behind the media? The Syrian conflicts tended to divide its people in to two opposite dominant discourses. According to Michel Foucault, truth, morality and meaning are created through out discourse. Every age has a dominant group of discursive elements that people live in unconsciously. In relation, Syrian citizens cannot see what is right through out these conflicts. Yet, these people have not realized that these conflicts have affected them extremely to a point where it became a group discourse. The negative actions being taken proved the exact opposite of wanting peace. Yet, if their actions are negative, why are they fighting for positive purposes? Is it controverting or contradicting? Triggering the Syrians to fight over what they want in a way that genuinely proves the opposite. Even though the dominant discourses have power with all the harm they have caused, there is still a higher class of power that indirectly controls these discourses which is the government. Nevertheless, peace and love never came from discrimination and non-explication. This is exactly what the government wants; to gain power over its citizens to be able to control their minds and actions.
There are two opposite dominant discourses in Syria, the ones whom support the army that is defending the Syrian government and its president Bashar El Assad and the others whom are supporting the army (FSA) that is defending the Syrians and looking forward to free Syria. While both are busy destroying each other for whom ever wins, Syria descended into madness that is getting worse and worse by the day. Apparently as the conflicts prolong, it lead to Syria being surrounded by numerous rebel groups, FSA (Free Syria Army), ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria), and the Kurdish rebels. The FSA (Free Syria Army) is an armed force that had started since the Syrian conflicts began; they had announced their formation on 29th July 2011 in a video release all over the social media. FSA perpetually dress in uniformed deserters from the Syrian military who had also called upon the Syrian army to deficiency and join them. Declaring that they work with demonstrators to bring down the regime and claimed that all security forces attacking civilians were justified targets. It has also been stated that FSA has no other goal except the removal of Bashar el Assad as president of Syria. In additional, they claimed that the issue is not religious. The FSA is generally seen as the more moderate and secular part of the opposition. Unlike, groups such as Jabhat al Nusra/ Qaeda, this has a gap between the secular forces fighting the Syrian government and the Islamist groups which often results in deaths. ISIS (Islamic state of Iraq and Syria) also known as (Da’ash) is a rebellious group active in Iraq and Syria. They were established in the early years of the Iraq war. Correspondingly pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda in 2004. The group merged into an umbrella organization of Iraqi rebel groups on 2006 under the title of the Islamic State of Iraq. The group was constituted of and supported by a variation of rebel groups, incorporating its predecessor...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document