Sweatshop Debate Essay
Globalization: Homework 5
November 20, 2015
Sydnee Lyman
Sweatshop Debate
Sweatshops are a very controversial discussion everywhere around the world. Whether the sweatshop is domestic or international, it is a major issue as to if it is an ethical way for production or not. By definition, the word sweatshop means, “a shop employing workers at low wages, for long hours, and under poor conditions” (Dictionary). The definition is portraying the term sweatshop as bad and inhumane. Some believe sweatshops are what provide better job opportunities in third world countries and improve lives. Also believing that sweatshops improve the standard of living and provide better pay than any other job provided by their country. While others believe that …show more content…
If controversy and debate comes up about these issues, large businesses may argue that they do not force employment in sweatshops. Employment is voluntary for all employees. These companies do not own the sweatshops although they are being provided the source of production. They do not technically “own” them so there is no blame that can be forced upon them. Another significant topic is the fact that they are being provided with jobs. People living in these developing countries don’t necessarily have a choice because they would rather get paid to work in a sweatshop than starve and not be able to provide for their families. Many also argue that sweatshops contribute vastly towards the development of developing economies. Although employees are not paid much, the economy benefits from low-wage …show more content…
For every pro on sweatshops there is a con and vise versa. Like many other debates are the same way, these points on the pro and con side are very supporting of each other and are very controversial, which makes it hard for economists to decide whether or not sweatshops are a good thing. Although sweatshops have been proven to create economic prosperity in developing countries, there must be a better way to higher wages and create better working conditions for these employees. It is inhumane and unjust to have any citizen of any country working under these conditions. They receive very little benefit other than not going starving themselves. Large companies need to implement rules and regulations regarding the conditions the employees are working under and what a fair payment should be for the lengthy amount of time they work for. This fair payment should not be the countries minimum wage, that in itself is
November 20, 2015
Sydnee Lyman
Sweatshop Debate
Sweatshops are a very controversial discussion everywhere around the world. Whether the sweatshop is domestic or international, it is a major issue as to if it is an ethical way for production or not. By definition, the word sweatshop means, “a shop employing workers at low wages, for long hours, and under poor conditions” (Dictionary). The definition is portraying the term sweatshop as bad and inhumane. Some believe sweatshops are what provide better job opportunities in third world countries and improve lives. Also believing that sweatshops improve the standard of living and provide better pay than any other job provided by their country. While others believe that …show more content…
If controversy and debate comes up about these issues, large businesses may argue that they do not force employment in sweatshops. Employment is voluntary for all employees. These companies do not own the sweatshops although they are being provided the source of production. They do not technically “own” them so there is no blame that can be forced upon them. Another significant topic is the fact that they are being provided with jobs. People living in these developing countries don’t necessarily have a choice because they would rather get paid to work in a sweatshop than starve and not be able to provide for their families. Many also argue that sweatshops contribute vastly towards the development of developing economies. Although employees are not paid much, the economy benefits from low-wage …show more content…
For every pro on sweatshops there is a con and vise versa. Like many other debates are the same way, these points on the pro and con side are very supporting of each other and are very controversial, which makes it hard for economists to decide whether or not sweatshops are a good thing. Although sweatshops have been proven to create economic prosperity in developing countries, there must be a better way to higher wages and create better working conditions for these employees. It is inhumane and unjust to have any citizen of any country working under these conditions. They receive very little benefit other than not going starving themselves. Large companies need to implement rules and regulations regarding the conditions the employees are working under and what a fair payment should be for the lengthy amount of time they work for. This fair payment should not be the countries minimum wage, that in itself is