Surprise Award Provokes Mixed Feelings
President Barack Obama won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize on October 9th. The award has brought immense attention to the modest President. This is an immense accomplishment for Barack Obama as well as for anyone who is privilege enough to win such an award. The argument throughout this article is if Obama is truly justified in winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Scott Wilson does an impressive job of creating an argument within his writing. Both sides are expressed with claims, grounds for the claims, warrants that act as an inferential leap, and some backings to give even more support. The Nobel Peace prize is awarded to individuals who exhibit a pursuit for peace in the world, the recipient has the interest of tranquility in mind for all the world, Barack Obama, his actions, and his critics will be analyzed to see if he is worthy of such an award.
President Barack Obama is only the third sitting President to win the Nobel Peace Prize. During his campaign for presidency, Obama claimed to provoke change and be different than the old administration of George W. Bush. “The Norwegian Nobel Committee praised the President’s cooperative approach to global issues.” The warrant for that ground is simply Obama clearly rebukes the Bush administration’s aversion to Harrington2 international organizations and treaties. The past eight years the world could count on the United States to not make a lot of international moves towards issues involving other nations. The United States might have entered the country without the permission of the government, but we would not sit down and talk about solutions to global problems. Barack Obama is about a different philosophy.
The prize comes after Obama has been in office for less than nine months, the claim is that Obama has not been in office long enough to receive such an award. The grounds for this claim...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document