Preview

Supreme Court of the United States Supap KIRTSAENG, dba Bluechristine99, Petitioner v. JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
544 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court of the United States Supap KIRTSAENG, dba Bluechristine99, Petitioner v. JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.
Supreme Court of the United States
Supap KIRTSAENG, dba Bluechristine99, Petitioner
v.
JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.

No. 11–697.
Argued Oct. 29, 2012.
Decided March 19, 2013.

The facts
Student from Thailand by the name Supap Kirtsaeng who arrived in the United States in 1997 to attend Cornell University discovered that the same textbooks that he was buying inside the US were sold cheaper in his home country. Supap have decided to start a side business by reselling foreign edition text books in the US and use the resulting profit to support his tuition and living expenses. Supap’s family and friends have shipped him books that he sold through ebay and made around $1.2 million in revenue.
In 2008, John Wilet & Sons, Inc, files suit against Supap for copyright infringement and won in two lower courts plus The Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the ban on importation of copyrighted works without the authority of the U.S. copyright owner.
Kirtseeng had appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing the first-sale doctrine. a clause in the United States copyright which enables residents of the United States to resell legally obtained objects without asking for the copyright owner 's permission on the secondary sales. The doctrine permits only a buyer’s distribution right and not the power to reproduce a book or DVD or any other copyright protected property. Essentially this doctrine allows function of the secondary markets like flea markets and online resellers like Craigslist and eBay plus ensures legality of library lending, gift giving and rentals of a wide range of intellectual property.

The legal Issue
The publisher John Wilet & Sons had a clear declaimer on all books printed overseas: "This book is authorized for sale in Europe, Asia, Africa and the Middle East only and may not be exported. Exportation from or importation of this book to another region without the publisher 's authorization is illegal." Attorneys hires by the publisher made an



Links: Search link in law database works by using KIRTSAENG ALL SUPREME CASE LINK http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirtsaeng_v._John_Wiley_%26_Sons,_Inc. CNN http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/26/justice/court-student-copyright/index.html?iref=obnetwork SCOTUS BLOG http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/kirtsaeng-v-john-wiley-sons-inc/ KNOWLEDGE ECOLOGY INTERNATIONAL http://keionline.org/node/1686

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Facts: Darlene Jespersen was a bartender at Harrah’s Casino in Reno in the sports bar. She was frequently praised by her supervisors and customers for being an outstanding employee. When Jespersen first started her job at Harrah’s the female bartenders were not required to wear makeup but were encouraged to. Jespersen tried to wear makeup to work a few times but decided that she did not like it due to the fact it made her feel sick, degraded, exposed and violated. She also believed that it interfered with her ability to deal with unruly customers because it “took away [her] credibility…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FACTS OF THE CASE: The Appellant, Director of Finance at Toyota Marin Lou Suriyan Sisuphan, took almost $30,000 in order to persuade the termination of Sisuphan’s coworker Ian McClelland by suggesting that McClelland should be held responsible for the lost money. The Appellant did not have the intention to take this money permanently, and returned the money before any charges were filed, but not within the 24 hour amnesty period that the dealership offered. The dealership terminated Sisphan’s employment, and charged Sisuphan with a “felony offense of embezzlement by an employee of property valued in excess of $400 (§§ 487, subd. (a), 508, & 514) and alleging a prior assault conviction (§ 245, subd. (a)(2)) as a sentence enhancement.”JUDICIAL HISTORY: The trial court found Sisuphan…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 11, 1996, Appellant Sandra Mitchell was having dinner at Appellee Friday's restaurant. Appellant was eating a fried clam strip when she bit into a hard substance which she believed to be a piece of a clam shell.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comm 393 Case Briefs

    • 12766 Words
    • 52 Pages

    1. CFAO 20-53 was not the reason that Liebmann was not permitted to serve in the Persian Gulf and was not in effect when the decision not to give him the position was made. CFAO 20-53 was not relevant to the action before the court and thus should not be considered.…

    • 12766 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On Monday August 21st, A body of a 5-year-old boy was found dead in A drive way of a home in West Mobile. The next day a daycare worker had been arrested and charged with abuse of a corpse.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: William E. Story had promised his nephew, William E. Story II, $5,000 if his nephew would abstain from drinking alcohol, using tobacco, swearing, and playing cards or billiards for money until the nephew reached 21 years of age. The uncle responded to his nephew in a letter dated February 6, 1875 in which he told his nephew that he would fulfill his promise. The uncle died a couple years later without sending the money to the nephew.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It was determined that the plaintiffs failed to show any part of the statute led to a denied admission to any non public school on racial or religious grounds. So the complaint of violating the 14th amendment was not discussed and dismissed for lack of standing.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tarasoff case is the case that “established a clinician’s duty to warn” (Mottarella, n.d.). Prosenjit Poddar, a student at University of California Berkeley (UCAL) was a patient of Dr. Lawrence Moore, a psychologist a hospital affiliated with UCAL. Poddar was seeking treatment for an emotional breakdown after being romantically rejected by Tatiana Tarasoff. In the course of therapy Poddar related to Dr. Moore his intent to kill Tarasoff that fall. Dr. Moore conferred with his superiors at the facility and the determination, customary at that time, was made to have Poddar involuntarily committed. Dr. Moore notified the campus police and requested that Poddar be picked up, warning that Poddar can appear quite rational at times. Campus…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Identifying Assumptions What does the fact that new nations generally want to be recognized by the United States suggest about their beliefs?…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    USpreme Court Case Study

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United States Supreme Court cases are argued and decided on Constitutional grounds. All arguments and decisions are based on interpretations of the original Constitution and, more often, on Constitutional amendments.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roper V. Simmons (2005)

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The case of Roper v Simmons revolves around the question, should children be sentenced to death for a crime that was committed prior to the age of 18. While the 8th and 14th Amendments guard against cruel and unusual punishment, does the punishment of death, for those whose crimes was committed when they were under the age of 18, automatically fall under the category cruel and unusual punishment? The Missouri Supreme Court, basing its decision partially on the Atkins v Georgia decision by the U.S Supreme Court which concluded that executing the mentally ill was a violation of the 8th and 14th Amendments, ruled that Roper v Simmons fell under the category of cruel and unusual punishment. This decision led the state…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper I’m going to detail the judicial process of a Supreme Court case, which was the first of its kind. The Supreme Court did not have original jurisdiction over this case. It traveled through each juridical system before reaching the Supreme Court. This case was of interest to them, not to question it the defendant was guilty, but were his constitutional rights violated in the process of prosecuting him. This case began with an anonymous tip that the defendant was growing illegal contraband at his home. The DEA assigned Detective Padraja and Detective Bartelt to sit on the home. After making the decision that no one was home the…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Civil Liberties Union was established to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to the people by the Constitution and laws of the United States. (ACLU) The rights that ACLU focuses on specifically include the fifth and first amendments, which give citizens the freedom of speech and the freedom to assembly. Founded in January of 1920, the American Civil Liberties Union was born amidst the Red Scare, where many people were being arrested without proper warrant. (ProCon) This of course led to the need for better understandings of the rights each citizen holds, and through that need the ACLU was born. The ACLU is a non-profit and non-partisan organization with its headquarters in New York. (ACLU)…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justices of the United States Supreme Court are strategic actors who strive to secure policy outcomes as close to their preferred outcome as possible. Accomplishing this sometimes requires justices to not always pursue their true policy preferences and sometimes it requires justices to ignore legal and policy questions. In this essay, I will analyze how justices were strategic in a few landmark supreme court cases.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    That the Supreme Court exercises a policy making role has been an established fact ever since Maybury vs. Madison defined the Court’s role in judicial review of existing law. By choosing which cases to review and by establishing precedents by way interpretation of a law’s meaning and applicability the Court influences the course of action adopted not only by government but by individuals and businesses who consider the implications of the Court’s actions. In adjudicating disagreements of alternative interpretations of a law the Supreme Court establishes policies which have implications extending beyond the specific case in question and into social policy at large. In choosing which cases to review the Court calls attention to certain issues…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays