Preview

Supreme Court Case Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1209 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Case Analysis
American Court
Running head: ARTICLE CRITIQUE PAPER ABOUT THE AMERICAN COURT SYSTEM

Article Critique Paper about the American Court System

Lonnie Norris

Subject:

Task:

Date:

Introduction

The article ‘Competency to stand trial and to waive the Sixth Amendment Right to Self-Representation’ explores the mechanisms through defendants in the American court can claim self representation. Ordinarily, in the American Court system any criminal suspect has the right to counsel, which is provided for under the Sixth Amendment Right. In order to prove this, the article use the Edward v. State case (866 N.E. 2d 252/Ind.2007) decided by the Indiana Supreme Court (Benitez & Chamberlain, 2008). The case fundamentally sparks interest on the validity of an accused to appeal for self representation based on the prevailing circumstances.

Analysis

The Edward v. State case leads to the development of a legal tussle to justify self representation as part of the accused’s constitutional rights. After undergoing evaluation by two psychiatrists, Ahmad Edwards got diagnosed with schizophrenia and as a result a declaration was taken
…show more content…
The outcome of the Edward v. State case recognizes the risks involved in giving sufficient freedom to the defendant due to the probability that this may be applied to their advantage during trial. Hence, by citing mental instability through a series of tests, and the follow up decision to deny Edward self representation the state falls within its legal mandate to exercise such discretion. Moreover, the state plays an overarching role in protecting the national interests given the jurisdiction Court judges have been given with regard to the prosecution of criminal cases similar to Edward v.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Milton Dusky Case Study

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    The roots of competency restoration began with the landmark legal case Dusky v United States (1960). Milton Dusky, a 33-year old white male, diagnosed with schizophrenia, was arrested for accessory to kidnapping, and rape of a juvenile female. Although he was suffering from symptoms of his schizophrenia at the time of the arrest and trial, and a testimony from a psychiatrist stated that he was “unable to properly understand the proceedings against him and unable to adequately assist counsel in his defense”, he was still found guilty, and convicted. His lawyers filed an appeal, saying that Dusky was not competent at the time of his conviction, and subsequently that the conviction be reversed. After reviewing the evidence, the court ruled…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1963 Clarence Earl Gideon presented himself in front of the Supreme Court. Gideon had been indicted for breaking and entering; after defending himself in his preliminary trial he was sentenced to five years in prison. During his time in jail, Gideon did some research on law and wrote an appeal to the Supreme Court. Gideon’s request of representation was on behalf of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court decided to put the case on trial; it related back to the Betts v. Brady case of 1942. Unlike Betts v. Brady’s 6-3 ruling in which Betts had lost, Gideon won the case with an astounding 9-0 majority. The main issue of the case centers on proper representation of the defendant. In order for the reader to fully understand the scope of the case, he or she needs to consider Betts v. Brady.…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antonin Scalia was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court from September 1986, until February 2016, when he unfortunately passed away. Scalia was born in New Jersey but later moved to Queens in New York (Reilly, 2016). Scalia’s parents were both teachers, which may have been why he was valedictorian when graduating from St. Francis Xavier high school. After high school, he went to Georgetown University, where he also graduated at the top of his class, achieving the honor of valedictorian yet again (Reilly, 2016). Scalia got his bachelor’s degree in history, but wanted to further his education, so he went on to Harvard Law School, where he graduated again as valedictorian of his class in 1960 (Reilly, 2016). After graduating from Harvard Law, Scalia worked in a private practice for just a couple of years, only to discover he would rather be teaching as a law professor at a University, which is what he ended up doing.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a reason the U.S. Supreme Court Justices tend to quote Dickens frequently in their opinions: he usually some good points about the law. When it comes to legal fees, Dickens often pontificated as to whether it was ever possible to have a fair trial when money determined the quality of representation. Two hundred years later and on the opposite side of the Atlantic, this issue is still ripe for debate because regardless of all the services available; social equality in the law does not exist - particularly when it comes to the mentally ill or disabled. This paper will discuss the ethical issues surrounding legal fees, examine the options for representation available, and touch upon how this affects the mentally ill or disabled - a group…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    McLellan, F. (12/02/2006). Mental Health and justice: the case of Andrea Yates. Lancet, 368(9551), 1951-1954. doi:10.1016/S014-6736(06)69789-4…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Aurora Shooting

    • 2481 Words
    • 10 Pages

    [ 17 ]. Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984, Pub. L. No 98-473, 98 Stat. 2067 (1999)…

    • 2481 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justices of the United States Supreme Court are strategic actors who strive to secure policy outcomes as close to their preferred outcome as possible. Accomplishing this sometimes requires justices to not always pursue their true policy preferences and sometimes it requires justices to ignore legal and policy questions. In this essay, I will analyze how justices were strategic in a few landmark supreme court cases.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Proposal

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As the defense attorney in the case of State v. Stu Dents it is hard to argue against the insurmountable evidence that the authorities collected at the home of Stu Dents following the murder of his girlfriend Uma Opee. Among the items was a journal which the defendant started to write in six months prior to the incident. With this evidence the prosecutor speculates that Mr. Dent planned and calculated this vicious act. While the journal shows substantial incriminating evidence against Mr. Dents it also illustrates the mind of a very disturbed and confused person. Entries in the journal discuss purchasing certain items that were allegedly used during the murder, however in his confused state of mind he also made references of aliens, God, and the end of the world. The court should consider this not to be an act of a premeditated murderer, but an individual who is suffering from severe mental illness. Confirmation of his…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gideon asked the Court to uphold his right to appointed counsel during a trial. The Court had made a prior decision on this very question in the case of Betts v. Brady twenty years earlier. The Court determined that refusal to appoint counsel to a destitute defendant on a felony charge in state court did not inevitably violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. In Clarence Gideon’s original Panama City, Florida trial Judge McCrary, Jr. denied Gideon’s request for representation using Betts as…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Life and the End

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This case is an appeal by Andrew Mugnano, who is incarcerated in a State Penitentiary for first degree murder and for malicious wounding, from a decision of the Circuit Court of Greenbrier County denying him habeas corpus relief. The appellant was indicted for murdering his wife, Theresa Mugnano, and for maliciously wounding her companion. In denying Mugnano habeas corpus relief, the circuit court did not appoint counsel as requested, concluded that Mugnano failed to show adequate grounds for relief. In the present proceeding, Mugnano claims that the circuit court erred in failing to appoint counsel to assist him in the preparation and presentation of his habeas corpus claims and that the court erred in denying him a meaningful hearing on the question of whether the plea agreement was breached and whether his trial attorney 's performance was deficient. In his pro se habeas corpus petition, Mugnano claimed that the State of West Virginia had breached the plea agreement which had resulted in his conviction and that his counsel at that time had failed to afford him effective assistance of counsel by failing to object to the State 's failure to comply with the agreement. Mugnano also requested that the court appoint counsel to assist in the presentation of his case.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Insanity as a Defense Views

    • 2905 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Each year the number of murders increases. Do you ever wonder if these murders would stop if the “criminals” were not given the verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI)? In order to be eligible for this an individual must not be in a correct state of mind when the murder took place. Oftentimes, people feel that lawyers misrepresent clients as insane; when in actuality the client is competent to decipher right from wrong. In the following text, we will analyze our research of what effects Texas A&M students’ views on using insanity defense in murder trials, focusing on political views, number of sociology or psychology classes taken, and hometown population size.…

    • 2905 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right to Counsel Paper

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To analyze and understand the aspects of the right to counsel one must understand the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States which states that; any person that is a U.S. citizen accused of a crime will have the right to counsel during a Criminal Procedure that helps aid the defendants or person accused defense. In this paper I am going to analyze the aspects of the right to counsel and the developments of the right to counsel in depth. Criminal Procedures included in the right to counsel and when self-representation came about will also be discussed. Also the role of an attorney and how it applies to our right to counsel.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Not Guilty, By reason of Insanity!" These words have stung the ears of many courtroom observers, especially the families and friends of victims whose lives were snuffed out by a so-called 'insane' assailant. While there are indeed many insane people running around the streets today, I feel that many persons who use the temporary insanity defense are more conniving than insane. Also, being an inexact science, the psychiatric community often offers up differing opinions as to any particular individual's sanity. Furthermore, money or lack thereof can play a major role in the success or failure of an insanity defense. The temporary insanity defense should therefore be abolished, especially for felony offenses such as murder.…

    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sentencing Persons with a Mental Condition. (2013, July 12). Retrieved May 4, 2013 from http://njca.anu.edu.au/Projects/Cth%20Sen%20DB/Principles%20and%20Practice%20component/mental_illness_sentencing_factors.htm…

    • 3560 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays