Preview

Supreme Court Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
804 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Case
1. This story is about the Supreme Court’s decision. What process did this case have to go through to get to the Supreme Court?
Before cases reach the state of transitioning into a lawsuit, a dispute most likely has transpired between parties that had some sort of business or contractual relationship. In this case, Betty Dukes was an employee of Wal-Mart, Inc. who complained about the disparities she encountered as a female employee opposed to the male co-workers. Usually, lawsuits can be avoided in the pre-litigation stage if all parties agree to some sort of settlement whether it is a monetary remedy or in the form of an injunction. Otherwise, litigation proceedings may take place if the complainant is adamant about pursuing a remedy
…show more content…
Wal-Mart’s petition met some of the standards to be heard in the United States Supreme court since their case presented substantial questions that had not been previously addressed by their court; the federal class action and due process laws were in violation of the prior case precedents; and there was an immediate need for a resolution due to the conflicting decisions made in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Kubasek, Brennan, & Browne, 2015)..
2. In the story, two justices wrote differing opinions about the issue. Discuss the differences between a majority opinion, a concurring opinion, and a dissenting opinion. What effect does each type of opinion have on the state of the law in
…show more content…
Majority opinions are decided by more than half the justices and are used to set case precedent. Dissenting opinions disagree with the majority of decisions made by the court and do not set case precedent. However, this type of opinion may be cited in an attempt to overturn laws. Concurring opinions happen when one or more judges agree with the majority of the other judges for varying reasons. These types of decisions cannot be cited; nor do they establish case precedent. The Supreme Court’s decision in this case has set case precedent on how employee discrimination lawsuits are initiated and further outlined the requirements of having substantial evidence instead of circumstantial statistical evidence for employment

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Is it clear to you why a court would be able to include in its remedies those who were not directly discriminated against by any employer?…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In recent years our judicial system has been faced with a challenge of deciphering the blurred line in determining whether in specific cases a partner can qualify to be labeled as an employee, thus protected under the Tittle VII and other federal anti-discrimination statutes. A case that had clear influence and has resulted in an undeniable ripple effect is the Simpson v. Ernst & Young case, a case that was heard in the District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. This case clearly demonstrates the presents of multiple legal concepts and is viable in illustrating the challenges our courts face in clarifying a workable guidelines for the definition of an employee. The case will touch base with the multiple methods of defining an employee, the influence case law has on the issue, and high light the long standing risk of miss defining an individual as an employee or employer.…

    • 3036 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The majority opinion announces the Court's decision and explains the reasoning on which it is based. The concurring opinion is written by a justice who agrees with the majority opinion. It either adds a point not made in the majority opinion or emphasizes an existing point. The dissenting opinion is written by justices who do not agree with the majority opinion.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court Decision ruled on a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with a vote of 8 to 1 ruling bona fide occupational…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brennan states that one of the proposed majority decisions is changed into a dissent before the final ruling is announced, then the Justices will figure out the final form of the opinion. In “Separate but Equal”, a dissent never existed, the Supreme Court just skips it and goes right to writing the final form. This article shows how the Supreme Courts decisions can cause major issues and controversies among the country. “Separate but Equal” proved to be a great example of all the controversies and problems that can result from decisions made by the Supreme Court by dealing with the issue of Segregation in public…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The appellant, Salim abdul Aziz Rahman, the founder of the group called the Global Islamic Jihad, was convicted under the USA Patriot Act of 2003 for "furthering the aims of known terrorism organizations by advocating the violence of the United States government that is called for by those organizations." He was tried and convicted by the Federal District Court, and has challenged the constitutionality of this Act on the grounds that it violates his First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech as protected by the United States Constitution.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One relevant United States Supreme Court case is Roe v. Wade. In 1854 Texas law prohibited abortion except “for the purpose of saving the life of the mother.” “Jane Roe” (Norma McCorvey) was denied an elective abortion under that law, and therefore, filed a lawsuit claiming that this Texas law denied her part of her constitutional rights. The Supreme Court ruled in her favor, declaring that the Texas law violated her constitutional right to have an abortion. The Court, however, acknowledged that the Constitution does not explicitly mention a right to abortion but said such a right was part of the “right to privacy.” The decision of the Court was that abortion must be permitted for any reason a woman chooses until the child becomes viable.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An opinion that a Supreme Court Justice may write regarding a court case’s verdict that the particular justice doesn’t agree with due to how they feel the constitution should be interpreted. Other opinions that are given are Majority opinions- which are what the majority of the justices agree should be the verdict, and Concurring opinions- which are given by justices that agree with the majority opinion but have other reasons why they think their opinion is correct due to the different ways the justices interpret the constitution. Other concepts brought up in the article were the ideas of judicial activism- when a justice makes a decision based on what they personally feel rather than judicial restraint- when a justice makes a decision based strictly on current laws.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. What court case established the process of judicial review with its ruling by the Supreme Court? Explain why this was significant.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antonin Scalia was a supreme court justice who was appointed during the Reagan Administration in 1986 (Biography of Former Associate Justice Antonin Scalia). This paper will touch on Scalia’s legacy and how he would make his decisions as a Supreme Court Justice. It will also establish what the outcomes would be in specific Supreme Court cases if every supreme court justice had the same thought process as Scalia. The cases that will be covered are Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade. Scalia’s belief in textualism will be thoroughly analyzed as to how it would affect his decision making and how it would affect these monumental court cases if all Supreme Court Justices believed in this as much as Scalia did. Different ideologies will…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court decisions had a great positive impact on the rights of suspected criminals throughout the 1900s. Cases such as Mapp v. Ohio, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Miranda v. Arizona helped clarify the rights of suspected criminals, as well as holding the police accountable for their actions so as to reinforce the rights of all people . All three of the aforementioned cases occurred during the Warren Court era, from 1953 to 1969 (Boundless). In terms of activism, the Warren Court was the most influential court of the 1900s, creating precedent in many areas, from segregation in public schools in Brown v. Board of Education to equal representation in court districts in Reynolds v Sims (Oyez). Supreme Court decisions in the 20th century, specifically…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Decisions

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I chose Drug testing programs for welfare applicants. The reason I chose this is because I happen to agree with doing so. I disagree with the junction that the judge put in saying that it is “likely unconstitutional”. I feel this because I am a strong supporter in helping those who are in need, not those that are abusing the help. As a mother of two, and have been on state assistance for help, I often would see those that are known offenders of the system, and find it very disheartened over the fact that we are helping those that are not willing to help themselves.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Decisions

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Decisions of the United States Supreme Court have had a significant impact on the nation. Multiple cases that have been brought upon the Supreme Court have huge impacts on the nation. A lot of these cases have had such an impact on American society that they’ve left a permanent mark. Marbury v. Madison, a Supreme Court case in 1803 that is considered one of the first major cases is very important to the way our government is structured. Also Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 played an important role in history.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution is often loosely interpreted to meet the issues of the present. In the words of former Justice Charles Evans Hughes, "We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is”. (Hughes) Judicial activism and judicial restraint are the philosophy and the reason behind the majority of judicial decisions. Most people are often confused over the true meaning and their proper applications. The theory of judgment that takes into account the spirit of laws and the changing times is referred to as judicial activism, and judicial restraint looks at strict interpretation of the law and the importance of legal precedent. To figure out whether a judge or court is considered to be an activist or restrained, you must look back at the history of judgments made by either the judge or the court.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In both the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal, dissenting opinions came from the conference between judges before the decision had been taken. In the debate, the different opinions fought with specific legal arguments. Unanimity is rare, nuances are welcome and oppositions are allowed. The advantage of dissenting opinions is that they gave force to rationality by showing the quality of the legal debates on the basis of transparency during the process of decision-making. From this…

    • 2331 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays