Preview

Supervised Injection Sites Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
786 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supervised Injection Sites Essay
Toronto is talking drugs again, but this time it’s not about Rob Fords recreational habits. Injection sites in Toronto have been a hot topic of conversation lately. The city’s medical officer of health, Dr. David McKeown, is calling for the development of a safe injection site for illegal drug users. The Toronto Board of Health will discuss the recommendation on July 10 and if approved, the measure will move forward for consideration by city council.

What is an injection site? You may ask… Supervised injection sites are legally approved and medically supervised facilities designed to reduce nuisance from public drug use and provide a hygienic and stress-free environment for drug users when consuming drugs, mostly injected drugs. The sites
…show more content…
Governments, they argue, should not be facilitating illegal, dangerous activities. “The state has no constitutional obligation to facilitate drug use at a specific location by hardcore addicts, the mildly addicted, frequent users or occasional users,” federal prosecutors Robert Frater and W. Paul Riley said in written submissions to the court.
There have been arguments that money spent on Insite would be better spent on services such as treatment and that government’s support of supervised injection sites sends a mixed message to young people who might be considering illicit drug use.

Some also believe that; Supervised injection sites do nothing to deter drug use or help drug addicts:
Part of the federal government’s argument is that drug laws are not an unreasonable restriction on individuals’ liberty. “Unsafe injection or, for that matter, consumption by injection at all, is a choice made by the consumer,” the federal prosecutors say in their brief to the Supreme Court.
There are also arguments that supervised injection sites are a magnet for drug dealers and predators, and that public safety demands that illegal drugs be tightly controlled.



Are you pro injection sites or anti injection

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When it comes to importance of public liberty and privacy it must be easily said that they are right that using drugs have relations our desires and human…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apart from providing safe spaces to inject, and clean equipment to utilize their drug, there has been a shift in public health accessibility of NSP’s, this is to state that the institutional attitude towards people who are injecting drug users or IDU’s, is changing, for example in Lexington-Fayette County Kentucky, people who utilize the established program can remain anonymous, and in exchange for using clean needles, the user faces no criminal penalties. (Needle Exchange Program , 2016) According to North American Syringe Exchange Network, as of May of 2015, “there are currently 228 of these programs in 35 states, The District of Columbia, The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Indian nations.” (Directory-Facts, 2015) To date, there is still no direct federal funding, according to research done by Society for the Study of Addiction, it found some major problems with existing NEP’s, which they call, operational issues, “The most common problem was ‘lack of funding/lack of resources’, reported by 56% of the programs. Staff shortages (47%)… Despite these problems, the two guiding principles of utilizing secondary exchange to increase the diffusion of sterile syringes in the IDU population and utilizing the programs to provide multiple other health and social services have provided an excellent basis for the development of SEPs in the country.” (Des Jarlais, 2009) So who is most likely to…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Druj Injecting Room

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Public money on medically supervised injecting room, in all good conscience, doesn’t benefit greater community. We have more important needs for critical services and should be directing taxpayer funds to meet those basic services first. Every year government spends 2.5 million on this centre for minimization of harm among drug users. I oppose it because of my concerns that the State's harm minimisation policy pays too little attention to advocating no drug use and rescuing people from their terrible addiction but pays too much attention to managing the addiction The injecting room statistically saved less than 0.5 lives per year or 4 lives in 9 years, at a cost of more than $23 million - an extremely poor cost/benefit ratio. So, this is not the best possible use of public money. There is clear evidence from KPMG report that so many referrals made to drug user is ineffectual because rehabilitation services are unavailable due lack of funding. Rehabilitation centers which are rescuing people from drug addiction are missing out from funding while the government spends 2.5million on services which doesn’t represent the best possible use of public fund. Are these MSICs are such a good idea? There is only one centre in Sydney, how can one centre in King’s Cross service the whole of Sydney? How many centers would serve the population adequately? How much would they cost and how would a service like this feed into the rest of the services required providing a comprehensive addiction service, rather than just an injecting room? Drug rehabilitation programmes are widespread and would benefit more, so money that being allocated for drug injecting room would be far better utilize for rehab programme.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robinson Vs California

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A State might impose criminal sanctions, for example, against the unauthorized manufacture, prescription, sale, purchase, or possession of narcotics within its borders. In the interest of discouraging the violation Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 of such laws, or in the interest of the general health or welfare of its inhabitants, a State might establish a program of compulsory treatment for those addicted to narcotics. Such a program of treatment might require periods of involuntary confinement. And penal sanctions might be imposed for failure to comply with established compulsory treatment procedures. Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197,U.S.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The disadvantages of the needle exchange program are more significant then having the program. The program would allow tax dollars to fund such a program. The tax dollars can be used for other programs. The program would increase drug paraphernalia in areas in which it is already high. The location of the needle exchange sites will hurt our communities and there will be more drug addicts in these areas. This will show the wrong message to our children.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs, he takes a different approach to regarding the War on Drugs. While he feels that current drug policies have failed, his book focuses on the injustice of punitive drug laws and believes we should stop punishing people for using illicit drugs. “A law whose purpose is deterrence must always be backed by a demonstration that the law is just.” (ix) His book is presented in three chapters. Chapter one describes our present drug policies and laws and raises questions to answer whether these are just or unjust and offers his position of decriminalization as a more ethical approach to drug use. Chapter two reviews the most frequent arguments used in favor of punishing drug users and Husak believes that none of these are convincing enough to warrant enacting laws on a person’s behavior. Chapter three declares that punishing drug users is counterproductive and damaging to us…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Needle exchange program

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (2010), there is discussion about other services that are available to injection drug users (IDU’s) who come to, and participate in the NEP. Counseling and testing is available for commonly transmitted diseases such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C (HCV). These are diseases transmitted through sharing and reusing needles. By providing screening and counseling, individuals are educated and made aware of how and why these diseases are increasingly being transmitted. Screening for tuberculosis and sexually transmitted…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Walters brings up arguments from both a favoring side and an opposing side. Favoring sides would not want to give someone government benefits if they are using the benefits to support a drug habit and could save the government money by denying applicants. The opposing side feels that drug testing would come to a great expense to the government and rather than drug testing an individual who needs help because of their drug addiction other programs such as rehab would save money to local, state and federal governments. The author feels that both are good arguments.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Butts

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In "Against the legalization of Drugs", We've seen how James Q. Wilson says that Heroin and Cocaine should be kept illegal. Perhaps the strongest argument Wilson gives to support this claim, is that a government may rightly restrict an individual's liberty to prevent harm to others. Although this is in violation with an individual's freedom of thought and speech. In this paper, I will present two arguments from Kantian ethics and Douglas Husak that refute this idea, and further show that heroin and cocaine should not be kept illegal.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    World Health Organization (WHO) conducted an in-depth study in 2004 whereby it was found that there was substantial evidence to believe that the needles exchange program has reduced the risk of HIV among drug administers. Similar findings had previously been observed by the American Medical Association in 2000 whereby they found out that the needles exchange program produced better results when combined with addiction counselling. Therefore, the American Medical Association adopted a position supporting the needles exchange program. (Stancliff, et al. 2003; Jarlais, et al.…

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opioid overdoses have recently become a notably broad issue over the past few years, taking the lives of over 250,000 Americans. With this problem raging out of control, safe injection sites are not a valid response to the opioid epidemic for four main reasons: there are other beneficial ways we can respond, government spendings will become an issue, the atmosphere of the injection site will be alarming, and lastly, providing drugs will not help the patient become drug-free.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From all of the policies we looked at in class, the topic of needle exchange programs influence my thinking the most. According to the CDC, one quarter of America's estimated 2 million IV drug users have HIV/AIDS (PBS, 2006). By establishing needle exchange programs, it can reduce this number greatly. The drug user is the the only affected by HIV/AIDS, as their children could be affected due to their mothers using used needles. Needle exchange programs has been seen to be effective in reducing the number of HIV/AIDS victims. The World Health Organization compiled over 200 results around the world, and they all agreed with needle exchange programs are effective (PBS, 2006).…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Supervised Consumption Sites (SCS) has always been a controversial topic that has divide society into two. The people who support SCSs often argue that it has the potential to reduce disease transmission, prevent people from overdosing, and give them more access to health and social programs (Article). The people who are against however argue that it is promoting illegal drug use and sends a negative message to society. The issue here is that for SCS to truly be effective, they must have the full cooperation of society and more importantly the police force. If the police force does not support SCSs, the clients of the SCSs may feel harassed and thus impede their road to recovery (Article). Knowing the importance of this, it…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Portugal Drug Policy

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People found in possession of small amounts of drugs are sent to a panel consisting of a psychologist, a social worker, and a legal adviser for appropriate treatment, which the individual can then refuse with no fear of legal repercussions. The cost of incarceration is higher than the cost of treatment so not only are they reducing the amount they spend on prisoners in jail, they are offering these individuals legitimate help to overcome his or her problem. This policy seems to have many more pros than cons. Between 2000 and 2008, some pros include: people treated for drug addiction rose 20 percent, adolescents, problem users, and prisoners decreased, drug-related court cases dropped 66 percent and HIV cases dropped nearly 75 percent. In 2002, 49 percent of individuals with HIV were drug addicts. This number dropped to 28 percent in 2008. The only real con to Portugal's drug policy was that there was a very small increase in adult drug users at the same time there was a decrease in the adolescents, problem users, and prisoners. However, over the last 14 years there have been far more pros that easily outweigh that single…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our country has gone to extremes to try and win the war on drugs. There is no evidence to show that they have made any real impact in ending or even lowering the use of drugs in this country. In1986 the federal government enacted mandatory minimum drug sentences. These laws force judges to comply with a minimum prison sentence based on the nature of the drug crime. By doing this, the federal government has tied the hands of our judges to use their judgment depending on the case. Their argument for this is it will deter people from committing drug crimes in the future. My argument is that we are treating an addiction which needs both medical and psychological help to resolve, not longer prison sentences.…

    • 3198 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays