Summary: The Importance Of Prisoners In Prisons

Should prisoners serving life sentences for first degree murder be eligible for a parole hearing after 15 years? They shouldn’t. Criminals who hold life sentences for murder, rape, and kidnapping should stay in a jail cell. Without even the slightest chance of getting out. To many factors fall into play and the subject can only run deeper and deeper. These convicts were brutal in the outside world, and after taking their first step in a penitentiary it only gets worse. Their mental state crumbles, eventually leaving them hard wired to live in a dangerous environment. Being prosecuted for such terrible crimes, doesn’t happen just once for these people, and American citizens do not want these fist degree murderers set free in their communities.
Does the government really want to give prisoners a second shot at murder? Government officials would hold that negative responsibility like a burden. We can keep these things under wraps by simply prohibiting parole hearings after 15 years, or even shorter than that time span. Because after 5 years people in prison are usually there for good. It’s too much trauma to handle and it leads to psychotic breakdowns. What happens to the peoples trust if a deranged man or woman is released into the community? Fear will definitely spread and even if a criminal had a sudden change of heart the citizens will drive him crazy enough to do something again. There is no direction of win, when it comes to giving a second chance to a murderer or rapist. Doing so would be rolling the dice on people’s lives. The negatives clearly cancel out. If the crime is not directly committed by the prisoner released, the people are rarely likely to push until that comes. You cannot mix animal with society. No matter the situation. In 2008 Dominic Cinelli went to The Massachusetts Parole Board pleading he was a changed man. Four months later the board voted to free Cinelli, even after being charged 3 consecutive life