Preview

Summary Of What Isn T For Sale

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
972 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of What Isn T For Sale
The article “ What Isn’t For Sale” by Michael Sandel is an article excerpt from the book “What Money Cant Buy”. Michael J. Sandel a Harvard political philosopher states some facts that back up his theory on his article and states “There and some things money cant buy – But these days, not many. Almost everything is up for sale.” Some of the examples he gives is: paying $90 a night extra for a prison cell upgrade in California, Concierge doctors that charge patients access to their personal cell phone numbers, and the sale of your forehead as an advertising space. What Micheal J. Sandel is questioning is the fact whether markets have crossed the line when he says, “everything is up for sale” meaning that buying and selling doesn’t apply to material goods anymore. Greed plays an important role on the financial crisis but …show more content…
Todays society lacks morality towards each other and was in a way going down the right path until now. An example that is given to us in the article “What Isn’t For Sale” is slavery. Slavery is about the worst thing that has happened to humanity. Putting up people for sale as a good is just simply inhumane. There is nothing moral about that just like selling your forehead as an advertisement. Yes we may have the right to decide what we can do with our own bodies but abusing the fact that people do certain things just for money isn’t right. If moral goods were to remain in the marketplace our society would just crumble and lack respect. Civic Goods also don’t belong in the marketplace due to them being public responsibility. Voting is an action that is constitutionally given and protected. If this right was put up in the market corruption in the political world would occur. Michael J. Sandel “To outsource them is to demean them, to value them in the wrong way. “ The only way we can have these goods is by debating for them. One at a time in order to value the meaning of these

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Each and every person has their own body that belongs to them and only them… so isn’t it our right to decide what we do with our…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In relation to the ongoing debate of whether organ sales should be legalized it must be recognized that benevolence best distributes by the respect and recognition given to civil liberty, and yet the deprivation of both presents itself in the case of organ sales with awfully adverse resulting…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merchants DBQ Essay

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On behalf of Reginald, a monk of Durham (Document 3) it was stated that people ought to spread wealth and goods, one shall not maintain high riches, for they should instead, furnish for charity-give rather than receive. Reginald, lettering on behalf of his colleague St. Godric, says that in order to serve the Lord and Jesus Christ, one ought to give up all possessions, lead a more simple life and give to those less-fortunate. Thomas Aquinas, a leading Scholastic theologian (Document 4) states that people shall not “sell what is not his, and though he may charge for the loss of his suffers.” He states that people of the earth and of God shunt sell things for more than they are worth, which is exactly the activity merchants practice, for they need to make profit by raising the price on what they paid for merchandise. A similar phenomenon was occurring in the Islamic religion during this era. Ibn Khaldun, a leading Muslim scholar in the fourteenth century, announced that men shouldn’t pay more for what an item is worth and that they shunt raise prices of goods for people, just so merchants can bathe in higher riches (Document 5).…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everything for Sale

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In his book, Robert Kuttner (1999) tries to shake the dominant orthodoxy of laissez-faire economics, which he sees as the “natural form of capitalism,” by attempting to “reclaim a defensible middle ground” between when the market is “best left alone” and when it “needs help” (p. 5). Kuttner’s chief premise is that a mixed economy is necessary for a society that is civil and decent, a society where the economy is in optimum health. For Kuttner, unfettered laissez-faire economy is in conflict with mixed economy, and that their opposition is essentially a struggle between the moderate but rational dissent — the call for a mixed economy — and the prevailing orthodoxy, or the desire to retain the economic status quo. He further maintains that a mixed economy is realistic precisely because there is virtually no escape from politics, especially in the economic landscape where the government can influence its course by adopting certain national economic policies.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The text shows the human condition through the necessity of money. For example, right here shows us the realities of money when it says “what things cost and what our parents make and how much goes for rent and how money ain’t divided right in this country”.(37) The children compare the 1000 dollar boat to how the 1ooo dollars could feed them all together for a year. Ms. Monroe encourages them to think about the value of money when she says, “Imagine for a minute what kind of society it is in which some people can spend on a toy what it would cost to feed a family of six or seven” (178). I agree with the children that the price for toys is unbelievable and outrageous. The value of money depends on if you’re poor or rich. What the poor use money for is stuff like food and rent and 1 dollar boats you make yourself; Unlike the rich who gets to use money for luxuries like 1000 boats and fur coats. For the children it’s all about social standing and “where we are is who we are” (162). Money is a necessity whether you’re rich or poor.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In all aspects, the financial crisis of 2008 – 2009 has and is affecting millions of Americans. One key factor to the financial crisis in the American economy has been greed by not only the government, but businesses and individuals. Our federal government from the President, Congress, the Secretary of the Treasury, and last but not least, the Federal Reserve, has each had a contributing factor in allowing the economic crisis to happen.…

    • 1932 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Markets and Morals" is an essay written by Michael Sandel. In this essay, Michael Sandel questions a belief that many people are curious about in today’s society. He questions whether or not if there is anything in this century that money cannot buy or be sold. He starts out the essay by stating that “There are some things money can’t buy, but these days not many.” (Sandel, 40) Growing up in this generation, I can agree that most things can be bought today. I believe that most items can be bought today because there are different ways for people to make money, sales and the major changes that were made after the market triumphalism.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our country’s values and morals have changed drastically since the origination of our civilized, settled way of life. The United States has transformed from living off the land to an industrialized nation with basically anything we desire at our finger tips. Conservatism has led to liberalism and the slow degradation of our morals and beliefs. Some try to blame new capitalism and the economic growth of America for this downfall in morality. The decline in morality was not brought about by new capitalism, rather the undertaking of new, unethical moral standards.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Chivalry is dead, then so is truth, justice, and the American way. America was based on profound leaders that set up a moral Constitution that make the men of this country question morality. Chivalry, being the Knights code of conduct, is a distinct set of rules that portrays the morals of a Knight. Not only is Chivalry not dead, but it will never die as long as there are men and women with integrity.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    New technology is constantly being released and of course everyone is all over it. These things are definitely not cheap, but people feel the need to be in possession of them in order to be accepted. "As often as not, it isn't the money itself that means anything; it is the use of money as the currency of the soul." This sentence is very real. It isn't the actual dollar bill that is important. What's important is what you can actually do with the money. If one won the lottery, one wouldn't say "oh, I got a lot of bills, I'm going to keep them forever and not spend them." No. One will most likely say, "I'm going to buy a new mansion and 3 cars, and part of the city." So in reality it isn't the money that people want, it is in fact what the money can do that appeals to…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to being immoral, opponents also tend to include that it is against their religion. This is a matter of state and religious views that are separate, making this argument is void. With it being immoral, that is hard to understand because currently it is legal to sell ones sperm, blood plasma, and other body parts/functions. It is also legal to use a surrogate mother. If someone wants to sell their own organs, then they should be able to sell their own organs to save a life. Opponents think that there will be businesses that will pursue organs for donation. It will then escalate so bad that people will turn to violence to get organs from people so they can sell them. These opponents think that the government will allow a market without regulations. Of course the government will regulate this. They will have set prices, restrictions which will probably include that the organ seller must also be the organ donor so stealing someone else’s organ would be completely pointless. Another argument made against the market is the fact that the procedure is dangerous. When a donor is making the decision, they’re usually made aware of the dangers and have to sign a waiver. Same will go for those who sell. Opponents also tend to argue that transplants don’t extend a person’s life for that much longer. According to government statistics, the majority of people are still living five years after the operation. Specifically these statistics include 69.3% of kidney operations, 74.9% of the heart, 73.8% of the liver, and 54.4% of the lung. From this, one can conclude that these transplants do help significantly in prolonging one’s life. (Analyses* what does this mean?) This argument the opposition makes can be easily dismissed. (Why can these be…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is necessary to introduce morals back into the market to control what can and cannot be sold. Without control in our markets, it seems everything and anything is up for sale. It is all fun and games until we realize that some are getting exploited at others expense. We were all born with the same natural rights, yet a rich man can afford to buy his own security while others whose income is not as big have to wait for the police to arrive for at least ten minutes. Money and class has become very prominent today, if you are not rich or highly educated you are not seen. The middle and lower class want to erase that difference by purchasing the same products that the rich can afford and are…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Relativism and Morality

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Goodman, Lenn E. (2010). Some Moral Minima The Good Society, 19(1), 87-94. doi: 10.1353/gso.0.0097…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Sandel’s book “What Money Can’t Buy” (WMCB) taps into a rich seam of discontent about the discipline of the free market and economics. Sandel’s mission in WMCB is to question whether the use of markets to allocate some goods is justifiable. The main arguments in WMCB are intended to provoke a suspicion that allowing transactions between consenting adults in a market place is not universally desirable. It focuses predominantly on market exchange, where one side of the transaction is financial. The book uses a range of provocative examples to challenge the intuitions of the reader about whether allowing a market to operate in a particular context is problematic. Sandel’s opinions on these issues in his book are essentially about what is right and wrong. One of the more interesting topics within the book is multiple discussions and ways that children are and can be sold. We will look at Sandel’s opinions that focus on the thought of selling children. Using Sandel’s arguments, we will discuss about the morality of selling children and whether it’s efficient to sell them in the market.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J. Richard explains the theory of the market culture. As his definition states, it is “a culture in which laws of the markets economy take place of the principles on which previous cultures had been established” (Richard, 22). Richard compares the market culture with a human based culture to establish a different perspective in how the United States has decided to make its citizen revolve around the thought of money. As he explains, “Violence in many forms come from the market world and is presented as the normal result of progress” (Richard, 34). This market culture has highly influenced immigrants to seek the American Dream because the United States projects prosperity for those who seek to be involved. The market culture is highly compared to a more human based culture because we should consider the morality of the situation, and try to do things for the common…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays