Preview

Summary Of The True History Of The Conquest Of New Spain

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
912 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The True History Of The Conquest Of New Spain
Conquest of New Spain When trying to recall a historical event, we try to find the most accurate and most reliable source that is available. It is important to make sure that the source is accurate because if it is not, the information that we share could be false. When recalling the events that happened when the Spanish and the Aztecs had an encounter, we look at many different sources such as excerpts, background information, and even the actual translated version of the book that Bernal Díaz del Castillo wrote himself. After reading all of these sources, I found that the book written by Bernal Díaz del Castillo titled “The True History of the Conquest of New Spain” is more reliable because it provides a good amount of information that comes …show more content…
It is a primary source so it is for the most part a reliable source. This source is a translated version of Castillo’s book which means that there is a possibility that some of the information could have been translated wrong, or something could have been left out. If we ignore the fact that there could possibly be some translation errors or some information left out, the book is actually a good source. We have information about what happened during the encounter between the Spanish and the Aztecs from the person who was actually there. In this source, we get a look at the events that took place when the Spanish and the Aztecs had an encounter. Castillo explains the start of the war happened between the Spanish and the Aztecs by saying “Either from anger [at this treatment] or because it had already been agreed on that we were to be attacked, it was not a quarter of an hour later that a soldier arrived in great haste and badly wounded.” In this quote, we get a feel at how Castillo could have been feeling at that moment. Throughout the rest of the book, Castillo records what happened between them and how everything ultimately ended. The source titled “Background Information for The Conquest of New Spain” provides a brief summary of what happened when the Spanish and Aztecs encountered each other without going

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When Castillo witnessed New Spain for the first time, he remembered the god-forsaken words relayed through the enemies of the Aztecs, which was that the Aztecs would obliterate them once they had entered…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Broken Spears is written by Miguel Leon-Portilla, he gives the accounts of which the Aztec Empire falls to the Spanish in the 16th century. The book, Broken Spears, shows the view of the Aztecs more over than the Spanish, Miguel Leon-Portilla describes the many reasons as to why the Spanish were successful in the victory against the Aztec empire. The Spanish had technology advantages over the Aztecs, and they also had the poor leadership of Motecuhzoma. One of the most notable factors that caused the fall of the Aztecs was the plague, this factor was very effective and an advantage that helped the Spaniards succeeded over the Aztec Empire. The Spanish had many advantages over the Aztecs which is why they had such a strong victory, such as, religion, leadership, and technology.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Spaniards allied with the Tlaxcalan indians and marched into Tenochtitlan. Montezuma welcomed in Quetzalcoatl’s men with open arms, but Hernan Cortes seized power of the empire by using Montezuma as a figurehead against his will, while Cortes made all the real decisions. Cortes acted as a secret leader until 1520, when events caused tension to escalate, and Cortes demanded Montezuma command his people obey the Spaniards. The Indians didn’t like this at all, and showered their leader in stones, he then went on to die days later in June of 1520. The spanish originally went to Mexico to search for land and gold, or other plunders because they had no prosperity back home in Spain. When they reached Mexico, they discovered the Aztec people and the native indians of the land, and decided to try to eliminate them and their ways (cannibalism, human sacrifices, etc. didn’t appeal to the Spanish, and they didn’t want people like that inhabiting the same land as…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Portilla starts out by giving a thorough background of the culture and religious beliefs. The reader can draw many theories on how this carried over to the Aztecs way of thinking and fighting. In addition to the religion and culture, Portilla shows the technology advantages the Spanish had over the Aztecs. He also goes on to describe the poor leadership of Motecuhzoma. Motecuhzoma will be portrayed as a coward. Portilla also writes about the strategy that worked rather well for the Spanish as they made alliances with the Tlaxcalatecas and other cities. He finally talks about plague that wiped out much of the Aztecs. This may have been the greatest factor in the fall of the Aztecs Empire. All of these factors combined effectively show how the Spaniards prevailed over this great Aztec Empire of the 15th and early 16th century.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mathew Restall’s Seven Myths of the Spanish Conquest is a well-written book that serves an important purpose. That purpose being: the debunking of generally accepted falsehoods about the Spanish Conquest beginning in the 15th century. Restall’s book is separated into seven chapters that specifically address general myths most historians and students perceive as basic --- universal truths. Restall uses the term “myth” to describe the inaccurate/fictitious depiction of history “commonly taken to be true, partially or absolutely.” These “myths” are the progenitors of unintentionally self-centered perceptions of events historically recorded in subjectivity. The Self-absorption, relating to the…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Broken Spears

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The book The Broken Spears, by Miguel Leon-Portilla, presents an account of the Conquest of Mexico from the point of view of the some of the indigenous people who survived those events. The passages used, written in the native language of the victims, provide us a brief description of the encounters with the Spaniards that were not seen in the documented history of the conquest. Native priests and wise men had documented the welcoming of Cortes and his men as the arrival of their God Quetzalcoatl and other deities, the reaction to the march of these “gods” on several cities within the Aztec state, and the manner in which the Spaniards conquered this once, independent, well-structured, pre-Columbian American civilizations.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Broken Spears

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages

    History of the Spanish defeat of Mexico and the Aztecs has always been told in the words of the Spaniards. It has often been forgotten that with only having one impression of the events that took place during this time period, we can never be certain of the entire story, or what actually took place. For this reason, Miguel León-Portilla took it upon himself to further explore pre-Hispanic history and gain insight from the native perspective. With permission from Dr. Angel Maria Garibay K., director of the Seminary of Nahuatl Culture at the University of Mexico, León-Portilla was able to gain access to Spanish translations of several Nahuatl texts. The aforementioned texts provided “faithful representations of the indigenous originals” for which León-Portilla used to detail the Aztec account of the conquest of Mexico.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    _Myths of the Spanish Conquest_ is broken into seven chapters, each dedicated to a different myth or mis-conception regarding the Spanish conquest. In debunking these myths, Matthew Restall works with three themes regarding the conquest. First, that the European discovery of the Americas was one of the greatest events in human history. Second, that the conquest was the achievement of "a few great men," which he subsequently describes as "a handful of adventurers." These two themes lead to a third theme, or question. "If history's greatest event - the European discovery and conquest of the Americas - was achieved by a mere "handful of adventurers," how did they do it?"…

    • 915 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    farfaf

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The story begins when the soilders near the city of Cholula. They are welcomed by Priest, Chiefs and Tlaxcalan indians but asked to lower the arms while entering the city. Cortes agreed as long as he could give a speech to the Caciques (headmen) and Chief's. Following the speech came a different request to tell Prince Montezumas troops to leave the city of Cholula armed or at least stay in the fields. Captain cortes agreed to this. Two hours later tlaxcalans arrived and fought fiercely with the Cholulan's. After this they began to March on mexico when they ran into four mexican chiefs sent by montezuma. The chiefs offered gold and supplies as tribute to their brave journey. As they continued their march they were amazed by the beautiful architecture of Tenochtitla. Prince Moctezuma later got down from his litter and greeted the Soilders. He welcomed them with politeness and respect. Cortez was so impressed with such a good prince that he offered him his right hand. Moctezuma did not take it but gave his right hand to Cortes.As the solders begin to become accustomed to the city they later find out that the price was advised by his Huitzilopochtli to allow them into the city…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tenochtitlan Essay

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This event took place on August 13, 1521 and was a three-month long battle. Even before the Spaniards arrived on November 8, 1519 the Aztecs were struck by unusual, natural disasters that caused them to believe the disasters were warnings of the fall of their empire. These disasters occurred between 1517 and 1519, the city of Tenochtitlan had an earthquake and Lake Texcoco flooded Tenochtitlan. However, when Spaniards conquered Tenochtitlan there was resistance from the other natives under the Triple Alliance; the Mexica/Aztec, Acolhua, Tlacopan,, and Tepaneca, that continued for 60 more years until the Spaniards sieged the Aztec Empire and built what is known as Mexico city today on top of Tenochtitlan’s ruins.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aztecs Victory

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On August 13, 1521, the Aztecs surrendered. Cuauhtemoc was held hostage and later killed. Spanish forces continued violence, killing thousands, even after they surrender. “As this practice was generally not done in European warfare, it suggests that Cortés' Indian allies had more power over him than he suggested.” (New World Encyclopedia, 2013). During the 80-day battle, an estimated 240,000 Aztecs died. The majority of survivors were young children. The Spanish government praised Cortés’ victory as he secured over 7,000 tons of riches for the country. The Battle of Tenochtitlán provided Spain a position in Central America, an area that continues to speak Spanish to this day, and they became a dominant world power until the loss of the Spanish Armada in 1558 (New World Encyclopedia, 2013).…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burying the White Gods

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I agree with the points of the article. The Aztecs were entangled in a mass of coincidences that…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cortez

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first factor for Cortez conquering the Aztecs was the weapons and horses. He sailed with 553 soldiers and 16 horses. With his 553 soldiers, they only had a total of 13 handguns and 32 crossbows. With facing an empire of 5 million, guns and horses had a major effect because the Aztecs didn’t have any firepower. Cortez’s second factor for conquering the Aztecs was siding with the Indians. Before fighting the Aztecs, Cortez encountered the Tlaxcalans, an Indian tribe. Cortez won the battle and the Indians decided to join his army against the Aztecs. Aztecs were prepared to attack first but, Cortez got information from the Indians. If it wasn’t for Cortez persuading the Indians to join his army against the Aztecs, the Aztecs could have attacked first and won the battle. If the Aztecs attacked first, some of Cortez army would of died and they would had only couple hundred of people left. The last factor for conquering the Aztecs was the belief that Cortez was a god. Cortez was aided by an Aztec legend named Quetzalcoatl. He instructed Indians in agriculture, metallurgy, and government. To the Aztec leader, Montezuma, Cortez could be the god because…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    avatar and aztecs

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although the Aztecs and Spaniards were getting along peacefully, that peace was about to come to a stop. Over time the Aztecs realized the the…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the Aztecs were cunning, swift, and agile, the Spanish had the advantage to the skill and armour. If compared, the Conquistador's weapons would have been more useful and powerful to use. Not only because of the fact that the Spanish weapons were more light and could be dealt with one hand, but also that some of them could be effective from far away. In addition, the Aztecs, fighting on foot, could not compete with the Spanish, who were riding horses. As the Aztecs, had never seen horses in their lives, misunderstandings could arise from their power, speed, and size, as well as being kicked if gotten too close to the rear. Another reason why Cortes is responsible for the fall of the Aztec Empire, was disease. The Aztecs had never encountered a disease, vulnerable to their bodies for a long period of time. Smallpox, brought by the Spanish, had a lasting outcome for many years. Finding no cure, being too sick to gulp the nourishments to their bodies, and being too weak and frail to help their fellows, it was no surprise that many Aztecs had died. It can be told by an Aztec survivor and witness, in Contact and Change Pg 227, “The sick were so utterly helpless that they could only lie on their beds like corpses, unable to move their limbs or even their heads. They could not lie face down or roll from one side to the other. If they did move their bodies they screamed in pain. A great many died from this plague, and many others died of hunger. They could not get up to search for food, and everyone else was too sick to care for them, so they starved to death in their…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays