Preview

Summary Of The Treatise Of Human Nature By David Hume

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1178 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Treatise Of Human Nature By David Hume
In Hume part 3 of the Treatise of Human Nature, it starts with going to explain the direct passions that arise from pleasure or pain.

Hume explains that motives bring us to action. He then talks about direct passions and perfunctory definition of the will as an impression we feel then he looks at the problem of free will and determinism. In the first section, he makes an argument for the idea of necessity. The problem is whether human action is determined by necessity with physical necessity or if necessity governs physical objects. Hume believes he has the answer to these problems like uniformity found in human action is the same as in the natural world and that inferences on mortality is the same as the inferences in the natural
…show more content…
Hume believes that reason is unable to oppose the passions and that the passions is not the opposite of reason in equality. He believes that reason alone cannot motivate us but perform simple reasoning. Only abstract truth can influence us our simple reasoning for example doing school work to get a good grade and simple reasoning influences us only giving us motivates. Since reason cannot motivation the passions therefore it can’t control it but rather passion control the reasons. Passions cannot disagree with reason, since the passions only represent itself for example when we think the passions are being unreasonable but later find out it our judgment that is wrong understanding the passion. He believes that fight between reason and passions is actually a fight between two different kinds of passions, one being the calm passion and the other violent passion. Both the calm passion and reason act with the same calmness therefore we mistake them for the same thing.

In section 4-8, Humes talks about what gives passions their motivational force. Both violence passions and claim passions can be strong, but overall the violent passions can influence the will more. He looks at events that could increase the violence of passions in us like swallow with violence. Having love with strength can make for a violent passion if it has anger. Hume then talks about repeated activity starting
…show more content…
Some direct passions comes from pleasure or pain due to the instinct that brings us towards pleasure or away from pain. Hume looks at joy and grief from a pleasure or pain point of view. He also looks at hope and fear in the same way. Added also is Desire and aversion from pleasure or pain with the will seeing if pleasure or pain is within our power to get. Hume talks about direct passions come from instinct, which is unable to be explain like anger and lust. The instinctual passions makes good and evil rather than the other direct passions, which comes from pleasure and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hume and Berkeley both separated in the middle of reason and sensation. Hume, be that as it may, went encourage, trying to demonstrate that reason and sane judgments are only constant relationship of unmistakable sensations or encounters. ‘’Hume believed that morality was based on feelings of sympathy with other people, and that benevolence towards others tends to promote the interests of our species, and bestow happiness on human society.”(humanism) Hume's contributes to monetary hypothesis, which affected the Scottish scholar and business analyst Adam Smith and later financial specialists, incorporated his conviction that riches depends not on cash but rather on products and his acknowledgment of the impact of social conditions on financial matters. In his moral considering, Hume held that the idea of good and bad is not levelheaded but rather emerges from a respect for one's own particular…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been a number of challenges questioning Hume’s sympathy. Some questioned the subjectivity of sympathy, since there should be an objective basis for moral evaluation, and sentiments, being the product of sympathy which is subjective to some extent, is not entirely an objective basis for moral evaluation. Some others challenged Hume with the “virtue in rags” argument, which suggests that sometimes good motives do not bring about pleasure in anyone, but we still approve of such motives, which is inexplicable by Hume’s sympathy. Another challenge is called the weak sympathy problem, which challenges Hume’s sympathy by pointing out that Hume only allows us to sympathize with others at a particular instant, and the object of sympathy is…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s arguments were actually responding to the argument as outlined by thinkers such as Plato, Cicero and Aquinas. Hume analyses four of the main premises laid out in a standard Teleological argument and deconstructs them in order to find fault within the logic. The first one that I shall present is Hume’s argument to disparage the claim that one can find only order and good design within the universe. Hume throws the omnipotence and benevolence of God into question when he highlights the fact that there is much suffering and pain and evidence of bad design in the world around us. It is easy to suggest that the world is not harmonious within the workings and regulations of itself and this is shown by the vast amount of suffering, disease,…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in Hume’s time, there were mainly three schools of thought regarding the nature of morality. This debate was initiated by Thomas Hobbes’ view that moral obligations and duties came from self-regarding motives. In response to Thomas Hobbes’ argument, there are two schools of thought, namely rationalism and sentimentalism. Rationalists such as Samuel Clarke argued that morality could be explained by pure reason , and acting morally is just the same as acting rationally. Hume is on the side of the sentimentalists, as he rejects reason as the basis of morality . Hume argues, rather, that it is our moral sentiments that serve as the basis of moral approvals and disapprovals . In Hume’s picture, each action produces certain feelings in the recipients, be it pain or pleasure, and it is through sympathizing with the recipients which we have an impression of the resulting pain or pleasure in the recipients, and thus approve of or disapprove of the active person’s character trait which led to the action.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The interaction of emotional and arousal to motivation was gathered in 1884 and 1885 from William James and Carl Lange. James and Lange believed a person’s emotions occur because of Psychological events that they suffer from. For instance, if a person is the victim of a tragic event, this can cause post-traumatic stress syndrome. This cause’s fear from that movement on and at times causes the person to withdraw from the event or anything pertaining to it due to fear.…

    • 326 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believed that what we see is based on our experiences and ideas, and we do not act with reason. Imagination creates complex ideas. Hume opposed the idea of an eternal soul, and questioned the laws of nature and existence of God.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume is an Empiricist, this means that he believes that the source of a humans knowledge derives from or mostly from their sensory experiences. In short, people gain knowledge from their experiences. For example, children learn languages through constantly hearing someone (a parent or guardian) speaking to them in a certain language. Another example is that one can come to know what different colors are due to actually seeing the colors. Simply knowing the name of a color does not entail that someone knows what the color actually looks like. One can never fully come to know what a color is by simply being given the definition because in order to know what a color is, one must have a visual of the color to connect with the name. Thus according to Hume, a person learns and obtains knowledge through sensory…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In reading the Enquiry, we have to consider on how Hume’s position is on human understanding and how knowledge is obtained will provide a distinct relationship. We know that he believes that humans gain this knowledge through our senses. Hume has provided two phrases on knowledge and how they are provided. He had stated that the experience that we gain is known as “Matters of Fact” and “Relations of Ideas”. Hume is telling us that the “matters of fact” is how we interact with the external world and “Relations of ideas” is from the internal world or the pure thought. Hume has set out a distinction of all references for the study of humans and…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume argued, that although sometimes a good motive does not bring about pleasurable outcomes, we are able to appreciate it . This is made possible by our imagination and our belief of cause and effect, with which we are able to visualize thus appreciate the supposed good outcomes of such a good motive under normal circumstances, and thereby approve of the motive, even if the imagined good outcomes are not realized in the reality . A good motive with good resulting effects realized certainly strikes us more strongly, but when the good effects are not resulted, we tend to correct our sentiment because luck carries no moral value .…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s main point in his article is his claim that a person consists of a collection of thoughts, memories, experience, and knowledge. He states that there is no existence of an individual self area of our being and we are instead just a “bundle” of psychological items. Hume is a type of skeptic as he believes that since we cannot internally or externally prove the existence of a soul or distinct self that it in fact does not exist.…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On his journey to doing this he examines the idea of being a thinking thing, the concept of clear and distinct ideas, cause and effect, and the fact that he is imperfect to conclude that God exists. Hume mentions in…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He says that when we think about a wound, we automatically think about the pain it can cause. This is the idea of cause and affect. Hume thinks that impressions or beliefs are more firm, lively, forcible and steady. Belief and fiction are the same concept in his mind.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although I disagree with his opinion, Hume exhibits a very sensible argument. David Hume explains four essential circumstances. First of which, Hume believes that God should dispose of all pain. Because both pain and pleasure stimulate humans equally, why should we be able to experience pain? For example, as regular humans we experience feelings such as thirst and hunger, instead of being able to feel the pain of it, we should just be feeling a lack of pleasure. Why is it necessary to feel pain when I simply want to eat or drink something? Secondly, God should eliminate all general laws of nature. For example, if a car crash is about to happen, God should interfere and insure that no person will come to death or extreme injury/pain. Next, God should not dispense talents and abilities unevenly between each of his creations. “God” created animals that obtain optimal strength, ability to fly, and run incredible speeds, while humans are left with minimal physical strengths. God also created people that are talented in sports, making life easier to stay in shape and a possible career by pursuing these particular talents, while there are others who have no special talent and are forced to take extra measures in order to gain fitness and a future career. God should have given equality to all of his creations. Finally, Nature seems to have defects that allow us to see that sometimes…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Emotions can also be products of prejudice, selfishness or cultural conditioning, for example the treatment of different races as inferior and slavery were the result of people’s feelings telling them it was God’s plan.…

    • 2613 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    These traits are the building blocks of our identity and should be fed in order to better understand who we are. These two men seem to agree that our passions needs special attention in order to have an enduring and comfortable life. Despite being different, they share similar ideas, one being that humans can be similar to animals therefore cannot separate reason from passion. Philosophers like Rene Descartes believe reason triumphs passion, and we are distinct from animals because of God and superior intellect. Without God involved, I believe that in an isolated state away from any outside influence that we are naturally selfish and greedy; in the sense that we feed off our desires similar to animals. We have the will power to do good, but giving into our wants and needs is easier to us. Because of this quality, we are taught to control our emotions, passions, desires and feelings to make sense of our surroundings, but at the same times. Hume and Southworth are both related by opinion and may even support each…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays