Preview

Summary Of The Objective Basis Of Morality

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
295 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Objective Basis Of Morality
In Thomas Nagel’s essay titled “The Objective Basis of Morality”, Nagel claims that “[t]he basis of morality is a belief that good and harm to particular people (or animals) is good or bad not just from their point of view, but from a more general point of view, which every thinking person can understand” (Nagel 124). When applying this theory to the immorality of the price of higher education, it can be argued that making college so expensive is immoral because any thinking person can see it is bad. Peter Singer’s segment in the film examined life can also be used as a proof because as he points out, the money that we spend on expensive shoes can go to UNICEF and feed a kid or even more. Now let’s imagine how many kids students could feed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Most students today either have their tuition paid for by their parents or receive grant funding or a loan. What makes her second point successful is that other students can find inspiration in learning that she paid her own way through college. What makes her third claim successful is that many students often take their education for granted because it is not their money being wasted if they fail a class. The weakness in Neal-Richardson’s claim is that she should not hold everyone up to her standard and consider everyone who chooses to accept their parents’ financial assistance as…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A moral compass is akin to that of an opinion, in that everyone has their own, and there is an extremely high probability that they are not all the same. In his famous article, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Peter Singer examines this concept in relation to what society believes that they are morally obligated to do, versus what may be morally-correct, but not necessarily mandatory. Singer places a particular focus on the affluent population and what he believes to be their duty to donate as much as possible to charities and relief organizations. Although his intentions are admirable, I believe that Singer’s views may sound good on paper, but are not plausible in the real world for three key reasons, including the extenuating factors…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Differences that are considered right and wrong. At this age he or she should know…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He explains how witnessing students wearing a shirt that said “College Is for Suckers.” (Hrabowski, 2013, 259) was extremely common because of their lack of knowledge on the true benefits of college. The typical arguments of not…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clugston, R. W. (1983). Identification of moral reasoning levels in freshmen choosing a Christian University, as measured by responses to an admissions advertising instrument. Ann Arbor, Mich: University Microfilms International.…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    For instance, if students make the decision to attend a prestigious, expensive college, Hacker and Dreifus have prepared alternate studies that will ultimately be a better investment for the student, such as: Philosophy, Literature, or physical sciences. They mention that, “the undergraduate years are an interlude that will never come again, a time to liberate the imagination and stretch one’s intellect without worrying about a possible payoff’ (Pg. 188, Hacker/Dreifus). Taking advantage of impractical studies will not benefit the students. Furthermore, they discuss how colleges are in need of more money in the down economy. With that said, they have provided the thought of spreading donations around. They say, “too many benefactors donate to institutions that are already well provided for. Even in economic downturns, gifts to the wealthiest colleges keep coming in”(Pg. 187, Hacker/Dreifus). Colleges that lack the funds necessary to provide a substantial learning environment are suffering. This is why the government needs to fund the more needy Colleges. When it comes to salary for all professors Hacker and Dreifus have provided an alternate route. By allowing for, “adjuncts to receive the same per-course compensation as an assistant professor, including health insurance and other benefits”(Pg. 185, Hacker). They mention that, “it is immoral and unseemly to have a person…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we speak of “Morality” we think of the difference between right and wrong, the difference between the good and the evil. We use morality to justify our actions and decisions. More often than not, people impose their morality on others and expect them to act in the way they find fit. They believe that the idea of right and wrong is universal. In her essay “On Morality”, Didion contradicts this theory and believes that everyone can have different ideas of morality based on their own perception.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer Is Wrong

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Got a minute? Good! Because that may be all it takes to log in to OXFAM.org and virtually save someone’s life. But hold on a second, what about your life? Your own interests? All of the other beneficial things you could do with that money? According to Peter Singer, you don’t really have any choice because you’re “morally obligated” to donate far more resources to famine relief and similar causes than what you currently think is enough, but without sacrificing anything of equivalent moral importance. In this paper I will analyze this argument and try to show that Singer’s conclusions are correct, yet they are not quite as correct as he believes they are. To do so, I will try to show that Singer is wrong to think that we have a “moral obligation”…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics, Morality, and Integrity all have some of the same elements that defines a person character. Being trustworthy leads to other elements of integrity. Such as, helping to better the community and respecting authority as a Parole Officer shows honesty. Being fair is another element which shows integrity. How can you be a Parole Officer, but doesn`t treat everyone equally? Third, being able to take responsibility for your own actions and personal growth as a Parole Officer shows integrity, as well. If you basically blame all of your failures and lack of progress on others around you then that shows your character and you cannot exhibit integrity with others and your career if you cannot be honest to yourself. Ethics as a Parole Officer could…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Even though living in pain can be a physical and emotional toll on a person’s life, no one can judge or comment on it without knowing how it feels, but choosing to end your life for this cause is ethically wrong. A person should not be able to choose between life and death like it is something normal that we do every day. Dying is not the answer to a person’s problems, pains, or sufferings. Now a day technology and medicine are highly advanced and can cure or reduce the pain of a person with a disease. Choosing to end your life is basically committing suicide and suicide is wrong.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The choice to attend college is a personal one. Earning a college degree involves a great deal of personal commitment. Ultimately, while the individual attainment of a college degree may benefit the greater society, the overwhelming benefit is to the individual. In contrast, a public road or sidewalk benefits the many. Road and sidewalks are integral to many peoples’ daily lives. Government should seek to benefit the many; however, the Denver City Council seeks to benefit individuals through the imposition of a sales tax for scholarships. In an era of limited incomes and higher taxes, the question becomes, “Which is more more beneficial-- taxing Peter to benefit Paul only or taxing Peter to benefit all?” This question was addressed in…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality In Religion

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The definition of religion as taught to me in class is bind or to come together. There are many religions that are practiced worldwide. They have different histories, adherents, Gods, meanings of life, afterlife beliefs, practices, and books containing text that guides them through their spiritual journey. From Christianity, Hinduism, and Buddhism, to Islamism, Judaism, and Rastafarianism, etc., religion offers diverse teachings. But they all have one thing in common, keeping the tradition.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Moral arguments have been some of the most popular as well as some of the most disputed arguments for God’s existence. Such arguments are meant to appeal to basic intuitions that people share with regard to the nature of morality. A number of philosophers have provided unique formulations of the moral argument, but George Mavrodes’ version in his article “Religion and the Queerness of Morality” is, perhaps, the most compelling.…

    • 3155 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When considering the theory of morality. There are many different views about the guidelines humans should follow in order to be a good human and live in a functional environment. Monism, pluralism, and particularism are three different ideas about how one should make decisions. Pluralism seems to be the most plausible in our society.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Niccolo’ Machiavelli had their own perspectives on what was moral and immoral. King and Machiavelli view what was morality right and how they would use this judgment in government and how it affected people in everyday life. King fought a moral fight against what was described as immoral laws to oppress blacks during an era of segregation in the United States. He believes that sometime it is moral to take action against immoral laws to get the results he and others that fought alongside him desired. Machiavelli as a Ruler, during a time when his country was unstable and constant political in-fighting, believed it was better to be feared than loved, and he took the immoral action of oppression to gain respect morally from his followers as a result. Machiavelli was a believer of the art of war to gain power, while King believed power was achieved in non-violence.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays