Preview

Summary Of Sulla's Enlargement Of The Senate By Santangelo

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
473 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Sulla's Enlargement Of The Senate By Santangelo
Sulla’s enlargement of the Senate has been a point of contention for a long time, with historians such as Syme arguing that the senate was increased to around 600 members, double its capacity. This is a very popular argument as Appian himself says how the senate was increased by 300 members, and with the usual membership at a normal time being 300, that would bring the total up to 600. It is theorised that Sulla also incorporated young men who did not have the political experience necessary and did not meet the minimum age of 30 years. Santangelo’s argument is that this was not a normal time in Roman history, and the senators may have only numbered 150 due to casualties sustained during the Civil War and proscriptions.

Santangelo’s theory, as I stated, is that the Roman senate did not total 600 members during Sulla’s dictatorship. He acknowledges Appian’s statement that the senate was increased personally by Sulla, however he does not state what the figure of the senate was at the time was of the additions, so we do not know what the final figure was after the 300 newcomers. In his argument Santangelo focuses on 3 main components, firstly the number of senators added and the number of senators already holding seats, secondly where these new senators came from in the social hierarchy, and lastly the role of censors after Sulla stepped in.
…show more content…
He uses these sources all in his favour to back up his argument that the senate did not increase to 600 members, however something he does not consider is the personal bias, possible exaggeration and the erosion of truth that occurs when this history is spread orally over time, this applies to the secondary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    According to Table 12.1, what are the differences between the House and the Senate? 437-8…

    • 5850 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    o “The Senate was regarded as the central institution of the Roman state” (Beard and Crawford).…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the classical age, Rome transitioned from a republic to an empire. During this time Rome’s senate was weakened becoming nothing more than a meaningless place for debates. This was because Rome became an empire in which the emperor had absolute power. While the senate was weakened Rome still controlled trade throughout the Mediterranean. This was due to Rome’s victory over Carthage in the Punic Wars. As Rome changed from a republic to an empire one change was that the senate lost power…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of their term, they were held accountable to the popular assembly for any decisions made. "Position open only to patricians, plebeians became eligible in 367 BCE and by 342 BCE legislation dictated that one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian"(Roman Government). The Senate had limited legislative jurisdiction; it's initially available only to the patricians, indirect exclusive power. It had no proper authority, and significant influence was continued, working for an advisory body to the representatives. Individuals of the conservative organization were voluntary and labored for life except finding guilty of…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro

    • 119088 Words
    • 477 Pages

    as the head of the Office of Public Debt he had influence. His grandson, Lorenzo the…

    • 119088 Words
    • 477 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sulla's Reforms

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By increasing the numbers of the Senate to 300 as well as allowing the inclusion of individuals from the Equestrian class, Sulla hoped to supply an adequate amount of jurors to the courts as the courts were in control of the senate. He also tried to prevent political interference from the Senate by recruiting ex-quaestors, thus overcoming the power of the censors and placing himself in a more politically stable position.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the new princeps, Caligula showed real signs of promise when he treated the senate with deference. What Grant calls a ‘cooperative and courteous’ approach, was an essential change that removed the senate from the state of servility that characterised their relationship with Tiberius. Supposedly at the advice of his grandmother Antonia, Gaius attempted to conciliate with the senatorial nobility, through the abolition of the delatores (informers) and maiestas trials that tainted the memory of Tiberius’ reign, as well as recalling senators whom had been exiled. Caligula also became increasingly popular with the Roman populace during the first months of his reign, holding games in honour of family members and to celebrate his accession. He held gladiatorial fights, boxing, plays, chariot races, and beast baiting, even adding an extra day to the Saturnalia (Festival of Saturn), ‘Juvenalis’. Caligula also paid a donativum of 500 Denarii to the Praetorian Guard who were fundamental to his accession, as well as giving generous bonus’ to many other groups and officials around Rome. Cassius Dio comments on Caligula’s…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gaius Marius and Lucius Cornelius Sulla are portrayed as being culpable for a generation of turmoil in Roman society, through the period of the second and first century. After the fall of the Gracchi, the aristocracy was refurbished, and the plague of corruption yet again swallowed the senate. The attempts of two patriotic men had been violently relieved and the incompetence of the senatorial oligarchy to put the welfare of its people first, again created an unbalance of the elite. Furthermore with a clear opportunity to weaken the hold of the aristocracy, it must be considered how Gaius Marius came to front as a Popularis and ultimately true successor of the Gracchi; and how he was overthrown by Lucius Sulla in 86BC as the leader of the aristocratic…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Documents E and F highlight the main differences in the administration systems. The Athenian Assembly met forty times a year and during these meetings, any of the forty thousand Athenian citizens were eligible to attend. This can easily lead to arguments between the huge crowds breaking out. The large number of attendees could also make it very difficult to properly count votes. The Council of Five Hundred was a group of officials that oversaw the Assembly. While this may sound like a great way to keep order, the officials were chosen by lottery from the general citizenry. This could lead to an unfair representation of the general public in the…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apart from who they allowed to be citizens, their ways of election were also different. In Athens, they had election by lottery meaning that every person had an equal chance. This was fairer than Rome's inheritance of their position in the Senate, but it was completely random, and the most ineligible person could be chosen. In order to make important decisions like laws or ostracisms, there needed to be a minimum of six thousand. Rome only needed three hundred to form the senate.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 133 BC, Rome faced the problem of depopulation and decreasing military service. This problem arose when most of the undistributed land fell into the hands of the rich who continued to use unlawful methods to take possession of lands near their own or lands that belonged to the poor so that they could have bigger farms. A large number of slaves were employed to work on the lands and for this, the rich continued to gain wealth and power (Appian. R. Hist. Ex. 7). Even though the Romans were worried about the large number of slaves and diminishing number of armies, reformation was not considered as it was not easy or fair to them (Appian R. Hist. Ex. 8). This was until a noble man named Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus became…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the Second Punic War, the Senate became the supreme power and as a result, many changes occurred throughout Rome. The ruling Oligarchy abused their power, caring more for their own material interests than the welfare of the republic. As a result major problems occurred throughout Rome. Serious economic social problems occurred, both rural and urban, causing grave distress among many Roman citizens. There was a military crisis, with lack of eligible recruits for the legions, aggravated by the Spanish and Sicilian wars. There was tension in the oligarchy between leading factions as they struggled for political superiority. And amongst all these problems was the failure of the ruling nobility within the senate to deal with these problems.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sallust talked about his view on Roman Republic declination in “The War with Catiline”. According to Sallust, Roman people had good morals at begging and they practiced boldness in warfare and justice at home which brought loyalty and friendly atmosphere to all citizens but after Sulla gained control over the army, Roman Republic started declining from good begging to Bad end and people started rob and pillage and they become cruel selfish and greedy for power and money. Sallust was bias to Sulla and he did not gave credit to Sulla for his good work like, restoring senatorial government and reformed to prevent misfortune in the past. Sallust criticized Sulla for his work but on other side he was supporting Caesar who was dictatorial.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Republic Civil War

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Social War would see the rise of Lucius Sulla to both military and political power as he led the southern Legions to victory during the rebellion. Marius had returned from retirement to lead the northern Legions. Once the Social War was ended, this created a power duel between the two commanders. The Republic soon fell into full-scale civil war, requiring Sulla to direct his Legions against Marius’ supporters holding Rome. Sulla became the first general to lead Roman legions against the city of Rome itself. The war would rage on for one and a half years before Sulla prevailed. He then carried out a series of purges to remove his enemies, a political tool that was becoming more and more common in the Republic. With much of his opposition removed and an air of terror instilled, Sulla was appointed dictator, whereby he then doubled the size of the Senate and gave it veto power over the Plebeian Assembly, in effect changing the balance of power in the government. At the same time, this gave him overwhelming support from the Senate. He also stripped the tribunes of much of their power, while limiting the powers of provincial governors. Sulla would resign his dictatorship for a consulship…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Short Essay On Bloodline

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Even though the Empire has fallen the Senate has been split up into two groups the Populists and the Centrists where the Centrists believe in a more firm government and a more dominant military. In the novel the two parties argue over many topics which displays the senate is becoming corrupt. A major…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays